Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: correlation with multi-detector CT features and clinical presentation

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to propose a computed tomography (CT) classification of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) correlated with clinical presentation

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed CT images of 40 patients with SISMAD at our institution from 2006 to 2015 and proposed a new classification: type I, patent false lumen with both entry and re-entry; type II, patent false lumen without re-entry; type III, completely or partially thrombosed false lumen; and type IV, thrombosed false lumen with ulcer-like projection. Additionally, we included a subtype (S) at each type when there was either a long segment of dissection and/or significant true lumen stenosis. CT features were statistically analyzed using Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney test.

Results

The CT findings classified patients as type I (15%), type II (12.5%), type III (35%), and type IV (37.5%). Of the 40 patients, 25 (62.5%) were symptomatic. There was a significantly different proportion of each type between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (p = 0.005). There were 25 patients with subtype (S); no type I or II, 12 type III, and 13 type IV. The symptomatic patients showed longer dissection tendency and more severe true lumen stenosis (78% vs. 53%, p = 0.000) compared with asymptomatic patients.

Conclusion

The proposed multi-detector CT classification of SISMAD correlates with clinical presentation. This new classification could be helpful for treatment planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gouëffic Y, Costargent A, Dupas B, et al. (2002) Superior mesenteric artery dissection: case report. J Vasc Surg 35(5):1003–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cho B, Lee M, Lee M, et al. (2011) Treatment guidelines for isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery based on follow-up CT findings. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41(6):780–785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cho Y, Ko G, Kim H, Moon K, Kwon T (2009) Conservative management of symptomatic spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery. Br J Surg 96(7):720–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Min S-I, Yoon K-C, Min S-K, et al. (2011) Current strategy for the treatment of symptomatic spontaneous isolated dissection of superior mesenteric artery. J Vasc Surg 54(2):461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park YJ, Park KB, Kim D-I, et al. (2011) Natural history of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection derived from follow-up after conservative treatment. J Vasc Surg 54(6):1727–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Subhas G, Gupta A, Nawalany M, Oppat WF (2009) Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: a case report and literature review with management algorithm. Ann Vasc Surg 23(6):788–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yun W, Kim Y, Park K, et al. (2009) Clinical and angiographic follow-up of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37(5):572–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ko SH, Hye R, Frankel DA (2015) Management of spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection. Ann Vasc Surg 29(3):470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lv PH, Zhang XC, Wang LF, Chen ZL, Shi HB (2014) Management of isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection. World J Gastroenterol 20(45):17179–17184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris JT, Guerriero J, Sage JG, Mansour MA (2008) Three isolated superior mesenteric artery dissections: update of previous case reports, diagnostics, and treatment options. J Vasc Surg 47(3):649–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagai T, Torishima R, Uchida A, et al. (2004) Spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery in four cases treated with anticoagulation therapy. Intern Med 43(6):473–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi B, Nakayama Y, Shiroma S, Ido K (2015) Three case report of spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery-with an algorithm proposed for the management. Ann Vasc Dis 8(2):120–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakamoto I, Ogawa Y, Sueyoshi E, et al. (2007) Imaging appearances and management of isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery. Eur J Radiol 64(1):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D-l Li, Y-Y He, Alkalei AM, et al. (2014) Management strategy for spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery based on morphologic classification. J Vasc Surg 59(1):165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luan J, Li X (2013) Computed tomography imaging features and classification of isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 46(2):232–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zerbib P, Perot C, Lambert M, et al. (2010) Management of isolated spontaneous dissection of superior mesenteric artery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 395(4):437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Foord A, Lewis R (1959) Primary dissecting aneurysms of peripheral and pulmonary arteries: dissecting hemorrhage of media. Arch Pathol 68:553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park YJ, Park C-W, Park KB, et al. (2011) Inference from clinical and fluid dynamic studies about underlying cause of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection. J Vasc Surg 53(1):80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghuysen A, Meunier P, Van Damme H, Creemers E, D’orio V (2008) Isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery: a case report. Annales de cardiologie et d’angeiologie 4:238–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kohtake H, et al. (2004) Isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery. Abdom Imaging 29(2):153–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim H-K, Jung HK, Cho J, Lee J-M, Huh S (2014) Clinical and radiologic course of symptomatic spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery treated with conservative management. J Vasc Surg 59(2):465–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roussel A, Pellenc Q, Corcos O, et al. (2015) Spontaneous and isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery: proposal of a management algorithm. Ann Vasc Surg 29(3):475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sueyoshi E, Matsuoka Y, Imada T, et al. (2002) New Development of an ulcerlike projection in aortic intramural hematoma: CT evaluation 1. Radiology 224(2):536–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitai T, Kaji S, Yamamuro A, et al. (2010) Impact of new development of ulcer-like projection on clinical outcomes in patients with type B aortic dissection with closed and thrombosed false lumen. Circulation 122(11 suppl 1):S74–S80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Beum Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoo, J., Lee, J.B., Park, H.J. et al. Classification of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: correlation with multi-detector CT features and clinical presentation. Abdom Radiol 43, 3157–3165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1556-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1556-6

Keywords

Navigation