Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interpreting body MRI cases: classic findings in abdominal MRI

  • Pictorial essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few things in radiology are “pathognomonic” in their appearance or presentation. However, having an awareness of those findings which are specific to a certain entity is important when interpreting imaging studies. These classic findings can be identified with many imaging modalities, but no modality provides as many recognizable observations as an MRI. This results from the large variety of pulse sequences that provide high contrast resolution, prior to and following contrast administration. In this article, the most classically recognized abdominal findings are presented including the following: Liver: Cyst, hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic adenoma, hemosiderosis, hepatocellular carcinoma. Spleen: Cyst, hemangioma, lymphangioma, hemosiderosis, Gandy–Gamna bodies. Biliary system: Biliary stones and choledocholithiasis, pneumobilia, choledochal cyst. Gallbladder: Adenomyomatosis, sludge, surgical clips in the gallbladder fossa. Pancreas: Pancreatic divisum, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, pseudocyst, autoimmune pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, adenocarcinoma. Kidneys: Simple cyst, hemorrhagic cyst, renal sinus cyst, angiomyolipoma, solid mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marrero JA, Ahn J, Reddy KR (2014) ACG clinical guideline: the diagnosis and management of focal liver lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 109(9):1328. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lantinga MA, Geudens A, Gevers TJG, Drenth JPH (2015) Systematic review: the management of hepatic cyst infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 41:253–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Noels JE, Van Aalten SM, Van Der Windt DJ, et al. (2011) Management of hepatocellular adenoma during pregnancy. J Hepatol 54(3):553–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Queriroz-Andrade M, Blasbalg R, Ortega CD, et al. (2009) MR imaging findings of iron overload. RadioGraphics 29:1575–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Radiology (2017) Liver imaging reporting and data system. http://www.acr.org/quality-safety/resources/LIRADS. Published March 2011. Updated July 2017. Accessed September 8, 2017.

  6. Luna A, Ribes R, Caro P, et al. (2006) MRI of focal splenic lesions without and with dynamic gadolinium enhancement. Am J Radiol 186:1533–1547

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Mukundan G, et al. (2005) MR imaging of the spleen: spectrum of abnormalities. RadioGraphics 25:967–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yam BL, Siegelman ES (2014) MR imaging of the biliary system. Radiol Clin 52(4):725–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeh BM, Liu PS, Soto FA, Corvera CA, Hussain HK (2009) MR imaging and CT of the biliary system. RadioGraphics 29:1669–1688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boscak AR, Al-Hawary M, Ramsburgh SR (2006) Best cases from the AFIP: adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. RadioGraphics 26:941–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu J, Turner MA, Fulcher AS, Halvorsen RA (2006) Congenital anomalies and normal variants of the pancreaticobiliary tract and the pancreas in adults: part 2, pancreatic duct and pancreas. Am J Roentgenol 197:1544–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li YL, Yu ML, Lee KH (2017) The crossing duct sign. Abdom Radiol . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1312-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao SY (2012) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: an update. Scientifica 2012:2018. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/893632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Foster BR, Jensen KK, Bakis G, Shaaban AM, Coakley FV (2016) Revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a pictorial essay. RadioGraphics 36:675–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chari ST, Smyrk EC, Levy MJ, et al. (2006) Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: the mayo clinic experience. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1010–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bodily KD, Takahashi N, Fletcher JG, et al. (2009) Autoimmune pancreatitis: pancreatic and extrapancreatic imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 192(2):431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matos C, Cappeliez O, Winant C, et al. (2002) MR imaging of the pancreas: a pictorial tour. RadioGraphics 22:e2. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.22.1.g02jae2e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Silverman SG, Israel GM, Hertz BR, Richie JP (2008) Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 249(1):16–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. (2004) The renal sinus: pathologic spectrum and multimodality imaging approach. RadioGraphics 24:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nikken JJ, Krestin GP (2007) MRI of the kidney—state of the art. Eur Radiol 17:2780–2793

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jhaveri KS, Elmi A, Hosseini-Nik H, et al. (2014) Predictive value of chemical-shift MRI in distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma from non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma and minimal-fat angiomyolipoma. Am J Roentgenol 205:79–86. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oliva MR, Glickman JN, Zou KH, et al. (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: T1 and T2 signal intensity characteristics of papillary and clear cell types correlated with pathology. Am J Roentgenol 192:1524–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roy C, Sauer B, Lindner V, et al. (2007) MR imaging of papillary renal neoplasms: potential application for characterization of small renal masses. Eur Radiol 17:193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leann Kania.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for the production of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required as images were appropriately de-identified and utilized for the purpose of an educational text.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kania, L., Guglielmo, F. & Mitchell, D. Interpreting body MRI cases: classic findings in abdominal MRI. Abdom Radiol 43, 2790–2808 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1551-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1551-y

Keywords

Navigation