References
Guehl NJ, Wooten DW, Yokell DL, Moon SH, Dhaynaut M, Katz S, et al. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic modeling strategies for in vivo quantification of tau with the radiotracer [18F]MK6240 in human subjects. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2099–111.
Laffon E, Calcagni ML, Galli G, Giordano A, Capotosti A, Marthan R, et al. Comparison of three-parameter kinetic model analysis to standard Patlak's analysis in 18F-FDG PET imaging of lung cancer patients. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:24–32.
JCGM. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. www.bipm.org. 2008;(September 2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurology
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laffon, E., Buj, S., de Clermont, H. et al. Fitting of late dynamic [18F]MK6240 PET scans for in vivo tau quantification. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47, 7–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04542-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04542-x