Advertisement

Reply: Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of each 18F-labelled tracer?

  • G. M. Kramer
  • O. S. Hoekstra
  • R. Boellaard
Reply
  • 358 Downloads

References

  1. 1.
    Kramer GM, Liu Y, de Langen AJ, Jansma EP, Trigonis I, Asselin MC, et al. Repeatability of quantitative (18)F-FLT uptake measurements in solid tumors: an individual patient data multi-center meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3923-x.
  2. 2.
    Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kramer GM, Hoekstra OS, Boellaard R. Reply: Repeatability of quantitative whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT uptake measures in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: dynamic versus test-retest design. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1528–9.  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.195461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology & Nuclear MedicineVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations