Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of each 18F-labelled tracer?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kramer GM, Liu Y, de Langen AJ, Jansma EP, Trigonis I, Asselin MC, et al. Repeatability of quantitative 18F-FLT uptake measurements in solid tumors: an individual patient data multi-center meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3923-x.

  2. Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:11S–20S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laffon E, de Clermont H, Marthan R, Paycha F. On the 18F-fluoride PET imaging quantification to predict 223Ra-dichloride treatment response. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:318–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kramer GM, Hoekstra OS, Boellaard R. Reply: Repeatability of quantitative whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake measures in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: dynamic versus test-retest design. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1528–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laffon E, Marthan R. Repeatability of quantitative whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake measures in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: dynamic versus test-retest design. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CHU de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France

    Eric Laffon, Henri de Clermont, Sébastien Buj & Roger Marthan

  2. Univ. Bordeaux, Centre de Recherche Cardio-Thoracique de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France

    Eric Laffon & Roger Marthan

  3. INSERM U-1045, Centre de Recherche Cardio-Thoracique de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France

    Eric Laffon & Roger Marthan

  4. Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital du Haut-Lévèque, avenue de Magellan, 33604, Pessac, France

    Eric Laffon

Authors
  1. Eric Laffon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henri de Clermont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sébastien Buj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roger Marthan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Laffon.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laffon, E., de Clermont, H., Buj, S. et al. Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of each 18F-labelled tracer?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45, 1272–1273 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4006-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4006-3

Search

Navigation