Advertisement

Could 68Ga-somatostatin analogues be an important alternative to 18F-DOPA PET/CT in pediatrics?

Editorial Commentary
  • 762 Downloads

A growing body of evidence supports the role of fluorine-18 dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F–DOPA) PET/CT in different types of pediatric diseases [1, 2, 3, 4]. Although, this radiotracer remains not largely available, its routine use is increasing in clinical practice, and it should be considered as an important diagnostic option in those Nuclear Medicine Departments highly specialized in pediatrics. The principal limitation of 18F–DOPA is its high cost due to its not efficient production. Indeed, synthesis of 18F–DOPA has generally been realized using an electrophilic approach. However, this electrophilic strategy produces only low amounts (0.6–2.6 GBq) of 18F–DOPA even when using expensive production methods [5, 6].

One of the principal applications of 18F–DOPA PET/CT in childhood, having relevant clinical implications in terms of disease management, is the detection and localization of focal form of congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). CHI is an uncommon condition caused by an excess secretion capacity of insulin from islet β-cells. This condition represents the most common cause of persistent hypoglycaemia in infants and children [7] and, in the case of severe presentation, may be associated with loss of consciousness and even permanent brain damage. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment of this disease is mandatory [8]. The surgical approach in the case of patient non-responders to dietary and medical treatment represents the therapy of choice especially if hyperinsulinemia is associated with focal pancreatic β-cells adenomatous hyperplasia (focal CHI) rather than with abnormal and diffuse insulin secretion (diffuse CHI). Indeed, focal CHI, after proper detection and localization, may be treated with a more conservative surgical approach consisting in selective resection. This approach may reduce the possibility of treatment-related events as diabetes or exocrine pancreas deficiency [8].

18F–DOPA is a precursor of catecholamine and is taken up by the neuroendocrine cells by the pancreatic islet by using the large aminoacid transporter 2 [9]. Pancreatic neuroendocrine cells are able to take up amino acids and to transform them into biogenic amine by means of decarboxylation. The uptake mechanism of 18F–DOPA by pancreatic neuroendocrine cells implies the detection of focal CHI by 18F–DOPA PET/CT. Thus, 18F–DOPA PET/CT represents a safe and non-invasive diagnostic option in CHI.

Indeed, in the present issue of the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Christiansen and colleagues [10] deeply investigated the role of contrast enhanced (ce) 18F–DOPA PET/CT in CHI and, at the same time, they interestingly compared the results with those of ce 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in the same setting. They evaluated 51 CHI patients by using 18F–DOPA PET/CT or 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. Sixteen of these patients underwent both diagnostic modalities. The aim of the study was to validate the use of 68Ga-DOTANOC as effective and widely available alternative to 18F–DOPA in CHI. Although, somatostatin analogues (e.g., 68Ga-DOTANOC) with high affinity to the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes 2, 3, and 5, should be taken up by the endocrine cells of the islets of Langerhans expressing all SSTR subtypes [11], only little information is available in the literature regarding the usefulness of radiolabelled somatostatin analogues in CHI [12, 13]. Indeed, this is the first and well-conducted comparison of such radiotracers in CHI. The authors underlined how an excess time spent before a proper management of severe hypoglycaemia in CHI is an adverse prognostic factor for neurological impairment. In this field, the lack of a prompt availability of 18F–DOPA may be overcome by using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues. The study confirmed, in a relatively high number of patients, the well-known [9, 14] high sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (100%) of 18F–DOPA PET/CT in detecting the focal form of CHI. Furthermore, the high accuracy of 18F–DOPA PET/CT, confirmed by histopathology in the majority of the cases, was also achieved by combining functional PET information with the anatomical information provided by ceCT. In addition, the authors introduced a semi-quantitative analysis of 18F–DOPA PET/CT results, and they found that 1.44 is the best SUVmax ratio cut-off able to identify focal CHI. On the other hand, the authors reported that 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT had suboptimal sensitivity (78%) and negative predictive value (67%) in detecting focal CHI. In other words, the overall diagnostic performance of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT was significantly lower than that of 18F–DOPA PET/CT. Thus, the authors conclude discouraging further use of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in CHI.

This study confirmed that 18F–DOPA is the tracer of choice in the assessment of one important diagnostic PET application in childhood (CHI). Nevertheless, the role of 68Ga-somatostatin analogues seems to be promising in the evaluation of other pediatric diseases in which the role of 18F–DOPA has already been evaluated. Brain tumors and neuroblastoma (NB) might be future applications of 68Ga-somatostatin analogues in pediatric oncology. NB shows increased metabolism of catecholamines, but it may also overexpress somatostatin receptors, more precisely SSTR types 1 and 2 [15, 16]. Recent studies showed that both 18F–DOPA and 68Ga-somatostatin analogues are able to detect NB recurrence/metastases with high sensitivity [17, 18, 19, 20]. In this context, the possible theranostic implications of 68Ga-somatostatin analogues made these tracers of particular interest and more attractive than 18F–DOPA. Indeed, preliminary data showed that peptide receptor radionuclide therapy seems to be safe, feasible, and associated with responses in patients with progression despite multimodality treatment [20].

Medulloblastoma is the most common of pediatric brain tumors [21] typically located in the posterior fossa. This tumor may be detected by 18F–FDG [22] and the uptake seems to be associated with survival [23]. However, the principal limitation of the brain 18F–FDG PET/CT, as in all brain tumors, is the high uptake of normal brain cortex limiting the delineation of cortical or pericortical tumors, even when dual-timepoint images are performed [24]. In this context, although characterized by very low normal cortical uptake, the sensitivity of aminoacid PET tracers, such as 18F–DOPA, in detecting medulloblastoma seems to be low [25]. From this point of view, the reported high expression of somatostatin receptors, especially SSTR2 and 3 [26], in medulloblastoma open a door to the possibility of using 68Ga-somatostatin analogues in disease assessment. Indeed, previous studies have shown that somatostatin receptor scintigraphy has a high diagnostic accuracy in children affected by Medulloblastoma [27, 28]. On the basis of these findings, 68Ga-somatostatin-analogue PET/CT might play a potential role in the management of medulloblastoma and can be used to detect distant metastases and confirm the presence of residual/recurrent tumors. A potential advantage of 68Ga-somatostatin-analogue PET/CT over the other PET tracers could be the selection of patients with medulloblastoma for SSTR-based radionuclide peptide therapy [29].

In the current era of a growing number of available PET tracers, pediatric imaging may benefit from the combined use of different metabolic and receptor-specific tracers. However, in children the selective and conscious use of the most appropriate PET tracers, based on the evidence and specific cost-effective analyses, is highly suggested in order to reduce futile radiation exposure.

Notes

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or non-profit sector.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Pfluger T, Piccardo A. Neuroblastoma: MIBG imaging and new tracers. Semin Nucl Med. 2017;47:143–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morana G, Piccardo A, Tortora D, Puntoni M, Severino M, Nozza P, et al. Grading and outcome prediction of pediatric diffuse astrocytic tumors with diffusion and arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in comparison with 18F-DOPA PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:2084–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morana G, Puntoni M, Garrè ML, Massollo M, Lopci E. Naseri M et al ability of (18)F-DOPA PET/CT and fused (18)F-DOPA PET/MRI to assess striatal involvement in paediatric glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1664–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu MY, Liu YL, Chang HH, Jou ST, Yang YL, Lin KH, et al. National Taiwan University Neuroblastoma Study Group. Characterization of neuroblastic tumors using 18F–FDOPA PET. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:42–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lemaire C, Libert L, Franci X, Genon JL, Kuci S, Giacomelli F, et al. Automated production at the curie level of no-carrier-added 6-[(18)F]fluoro-L-dopa and 2-[(18)F]fluoro-L-tyrosine on a FASTlab synthesizer. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2015 15;58:281–290.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azad BB, Chirakal R, Schrobilgen GJ. Trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, an alternative solvent medium for the direct electrophilic fluorination of DOPA: new syntheses of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA and 6-[18F]fluoro-D-DOPA. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2007;50:1236–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arnoux JB, Verkarre V, Saint-Martin C, Montravers F, Brassier A, Valayannopoulos V, et al. Congenital hyperinsulinism: current trends in diagnosis and therapy. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pierro A. Nah SASurgical management of congenital hyperinsulinism of infancy. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2011;20:50–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ribeiro MJ, Boddaert N, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Bourgeois S, Valayannopoulos V, Delzescaux T, et al. The added value of [18F]fluoro-L-DOPA PET in the diagnosis of hyperinsulinism of infancy: a retrospective study involving 49 children. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:2120–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christiansen CD, Petersen H, Nielsen AL, Detlefsen S, Brusgaard K, Rasmussen L, Melikyan M, Ekström K, Globa E, Rasmussen AH, Hovendal C, Christesen HT. 18F-DOPA PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT scans as diagnostic tools in focal congenital hyperinsulinism: a blinded evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar U, Sasi R, Suresh S, Patel A, Thangaraju M, Metrakos P, et al. Subtype-selective 33 expression of the five somatostatin receptors (hSSTR1-5) in human pancreatic islet cells: a 34 quantitative double-label immunohistochemical analysis. Diabetes. 1999;48:77–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yadav D, Dhingra B, Kumar S, Kumar V, Dutta AK. Persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia 36 of infancy. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2012;25:591–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dutta S, Venkataseshan S, Bal C, Rao KLN, Gupta K, Bhattacharya A, et al. Novel use of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in localization of focal congenital Hyperinsulinism: promising but fallible. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2009;22:965–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Treglia G, Mirk P, Giordano A, Rufini V. Diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography in diagnosing and localizing the focal form of congenital hyperinsulinism: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42:1372–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Dorisio MS, Chen F, O’Dorisio TM, Wray D, Qualman SJ. Characterization of somatostatin receptors on human neuroblastoma tumors. Cell Growth Differ. 1994;5:1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Albers AR, O’Dorisio MS, Balster DA, Caprara M, Gosh P, Chen F, et al. Somatostatin receptor gene expression in neuroblastoma. Regul Pept. 2000;88:61–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Piccardo A, Lopci E, Conte M, Garaventa A, Foppiani L, Altrinetti V, et al. Comparison of (18)F-dopa PET/CT and (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy in stage 3 and 4 neuroblastoma: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:57–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kroiss A, Putzer D, Uprimny C, Decristoforo C, Gabriel M, Santner W, et al. Functional imaging in phaeochromocytoma and neuroblastoma with 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr 3-octreotide positron emission tomography and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:865–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gains JE, Bomanji JB, Fersht NL, Sullivan T, D’Souza D, Sullivan KP, et al. 177Lu-DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy for childhood neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(7):1041–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kong G, Hofman MS, Murray WK, Wilson S, Wood P, Downie P, et al. Initial experience with Gallium-68 DOTA-Octreotate PET/CT and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for pediatric patients with refractory metastatic neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016;38:87–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Packer RJ, Vezina G. Management of and prognosis with medulloblastoma: therapy at a crossroads. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:1419–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zukotynski K, Fahey F, Kocak M, Kun L, Boyett J, Fouladi M, et al. 18F-FDG PET and MR imaging associations across a spectrum of pediatric brain tumors: a report from the pediatric brain tumor consortium. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(9):1473–80.  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.139626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gururangan S, Hwang E, Herendon JE II, Fuchs H, George T, Coleman RE. [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in patients with medulloblastoma. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:1280–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Albert NL, Weller M, Suchorska B, Galldiks N, Soffietti R, Kim MM, et al. Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18:1199–208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cicone F, Clerico A, Minniti G, Paiano M, Carideo L, Scaringi C, et al. (18)F-DOPA Positron Emission Tomography in Medulloblastoma: 2 Case Reports. World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;93:490.e7–e11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cervera P, Videau C, Viollet C, Petrucci C, Lacombe J, Winsky-Sommerer R, et al. Comparison of somatostatin receptor expression in human gliomas and medulloblastomas. J Neuroendocrinol. 2002;14(6):458–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Müller HL, Frühwald MC, Scheubeck M, Rendl J, Warmuth-Metz M, Sörensen N, et al. A possible role for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in thediagnosis and follow-up of children with medulloblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol. 1998;38:27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yüksel M, Lutterbey G, Biersack HJ, Elke U, Hasan C, Gao Z, et al. 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in medulloblastoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(1):111–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vaidyanathan G, Affleck DJ, Zhao XG, Keir ST, Zalutsky MR. [177Lu]-DOTAO-Tyr3-octreotate: a potential targeted radiotherapeutic for the treatment of medulloblastoma. Curr Radiopharm. 2010;3:29–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nuclear MedicineE.O. Ospedali GallieraGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT CentreOncology Institute of Southern SwitzerlandBellinzonaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Health Technology Assessment Unit, General DirectorateEnte Ospedaliero CantonaleBellinzonaSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingCHUV University HospitalLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations