Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 47, Issue 7, pp 1029–1037 | Cite as

Epiphyseal hyperplasia caused by an ectopic ossification center of the distal tibia: presentation of a pediatric case with 13 years of radiological surveillance

  • Susanne Scheipl
  • Stefan Tauber
  • Marko Bergovec
  • Andreas Leithner
  • Gerhard Ranner
Case Report

Abstract

Herein, we report the case of a 4-year-old boy, who presented with a cortical lytic lesion of his distal tibia. It was located eccentrically, measured 2 cm in its craniocaudal diameter, and was associated with a lamella-like soft-tissue mineralization that resembled a periosteal reaction. Thus, the lesion’s radiographic features were initially suggestive of an aggressive disease. However, further imaging revealed the lesion to be of cartilaginous origin and to extend into the metaphysis, thus creating the aspect of hyperplastic epiphyseal cartilage. This cartilaginous hyperplasia was likely caused by an ectopic ossification center, although no similar cases have yet been reported. As radiology and clinics no longer indicated the imminent threat of a high-grade malignancy, we decided against a biopsy to avoid interfering with epiphyseal growth. However, because of the unprecedented nature of the given constellation, we closely monitored the lesion radiologically to rule out an untypical manifestation of a benign but potentially expanding lesion, in addition to a growth disturbance resulting from the lesion itself. However, further imaging indicated that mineralization and ossifications, which were already present at the lesion’s initial presentation, increased over time, until the lesion fully disappeared after 13 years of clinical and radiological surveillance. This case is outstanding because of its singular morphology and the long-term follow-up that illustrates its self-limiting natural course. This report provides support in differential diagnosis to help discriminate potentially self-limiting conditions from other diseases that may require invasive diagnosis and/or therapy.

Keywords

Epiphyseal hyperplasia Ectopic ossification center Bone neoplasms Tumor-like lesion Growth plate Epiphysis Growth dysplasia Differential diagnosis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the patient and his family for granting their permission to publish this report. We are also very grateful to Martin Stelzer and Andrea Fink, MSc, for their great and important help with the configuration of the images.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patient.

References

  1. 1.
    Jans LB, Jaremko JL, Ditchfield M, Verstraete KL. Evolution of femoral condylar ossification at MR imaging: frequency and patient age distribution. Radiology. 2011;258(3):880–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr, Spevak MR, Belanger PL, Richmond JM. Extension of growth-plate cartilage into the metaphysis: a sign of healing fracture in abused infants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(4):775–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laor T, Hartman AL, Jaramillo D. Local physeal widening on MR imaging: an incidental finding suggesting prior metaphyseal insult. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27(8):654–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaramillo D, Laor T, Zaleske DJ. Indirect trauma to the growth plate: results of MR imaging after epiphyseal and metaphyseal injury in rabbits. Radiology. 1993;187(1):171–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briggs MD, Chapman KL. Pseudoachondroplasia and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia: mutation review, molecular interactions, and genotype to phenotype correlations. Hum Mutat. 2002;19(5):465–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hesse B, Kohler G. Does it always have to be Perthes’ disease? What is epiphyseal dysplasia? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Briggs MD, Bell PA, Wright MJ, Pirog KA. New therapeutic targets in rare genetic skeletal diseases. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2015;3(10):1137–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oussoren E, Brands MM, Ruijter GJ, der Ploeg AT, Reuser AJ. Bone, joint and tooth development in mucopolysaccharidoses: relevance to therapeutic options. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812(11):1542–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Struijs PA, Kerkhoffs GM, Besselaar PP. Treatment of dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica: a systematic review of published reports and a report of seven patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(5):620–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tyler PA, Rajeswaran G, Saifuddin A. Imaging of dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica (Trevor’s disease). Clin Radiol. 2013;68(4):415–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosenberg A, Cleton-Jansen A, Gd P, Deyrup A, Hauben E, Squire J. Conventional osteosarcoma. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2013. p. 282–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ed A, Lessnick S, Sorensen P. Ewing sarcoma. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2013. p. 306–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Young BD, Egeler R, Rollins B. Langerhans cell histiocytosis. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2013. p. 356–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ojeda-Thies C, Bonsfills N, Albinana J. Solitary epiphyseal enchondroma of the proximal femur in a 23-month-old girl. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(5):565–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henderson ER, Pohlmann RA, Hollowell ML, Gebhardt MC. Epiphyseal lesion of the humerus in a child. Solitary epiphyseal enchondroma of the humeral greater tuberosity. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(7):1001–2; 1021–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones KB, Buckwalter JA, Frassica FJ, McCarthy EF. Intracortical chondroma: a report of two cases. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35(5):298–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niethard M, Rogalski M, Deja M, Zacher J. Partial physeal growth arrest with increasing genu varum deformity caused by a cortical enchondroma—a case report. Z Orthop Unfall. 2008;146(6):725–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brien EW, Mirra JM, Luck JV Jr. Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology and clinical biology. II. Juxtacortical cartilage tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 1999;28(1):1–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bovée J, Alman B. Enchondromatosis: Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2013. p. 376–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salter R, Harris W. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:587–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cepela DJ, Tartaglione JP, Dooley TP, Patel PN. Classifications in brief: Salter-Harris classification of pediatric physeal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(11):2531–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Scheipl
    • 1
  • Stefan Tauber
    • 2
  • Marko Bergovec
    • 1
  • Andreas Leithner
    • 1
  • Gerhard Ranner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumaMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Department of Trauma SurgeryDistrict Hospital Feldbach-FuerstenfeldFeldbachAustria
  3. 3.CT/MRI Center Graz GeidorfPrivate Clinic KreuzschwesternGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations