Skip to main content
Log in

The role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the forearm interosseous membrane. A review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interosseous membrane of the forearm is an important structure to consider in cases of elbow and forearm trauma; it can be injured after elbow or forearm fractures, leading to longitudinal forearm instability. Diagnosis of interosseous membrane injuries is challenging, and failure in diagnosis may result in poor clinical outcomes and complications. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound have shown to be valuable methods for the evaluation of this important structure. Both techniques have advantages and limitations, and its use should be adapted to each specific clinical scenario. This article presents an up-to-date literature review regarding the use of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the forearm interosseous membrane evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skahen 3rd JR, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. The interosseous membrane of the forearm: anatomy and function. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;6:981–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson PA, Moseley Jr JB, Tullos HS. Radial head fracture. A potentially complex injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;297:224–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hotchkiss RN, An KN, Sowa DT, Basta S and Weiland AJ. An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: pathomechanics of proximal migration of the radius. J Hand Surg [Am] 1989; 256–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rabinowitz RS, Light TR, Havey RM, Gourineni P, Patwardhan AG, Sartori MJ, et al. The role of the interosseous membrane and triangular fibrocartilage complex in forearm stability. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;3:385–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace AL, Walsh WR, van Rooijen M, Hughes JS, Sonnabend DH. The interosseous membrane in radio-ulnar dissociation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;3:422–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rodriguez-Martin J, Pretell-Mazzini J, Vidal-Bujanda C. Unusual pattern of Essex–Lopresti injury with negative plain radiographs of the wrist: a case report and literature review. Hand Surg. 2010;1:41–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hotchkiss RN. Injuries to the interosseous ligament of the forearm. Hand Clin. 1994;3:391–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marcotte AL, Osterman AL. Longitudinal radioulnar dissociation: identification and treatment of acute and chronic injuries. Hand Clin. 2007;2:195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Skahen 3rd JR, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;6:986–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stabile KJ, Pfaeffle J, Saris I, Li ZM, Tomaino MM. Structural properties of reconstruction constructs for the interosseous ligament of the forearm. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;2:312–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tejwani SG, Markolf KL, Benhaim P. Graft reconstruction of the interosseous membrane in conjunction with metallic radial head replacement: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;2:335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tejwani SG, Markolf KL, Benhaim P. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm with a graft substitute: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;2:326–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomaino MM, Pfaeffle J, Stabile K, Li ZM. Reconstruction of the interosseous ligament of the forearm reduces load on the radial head in cadavers. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;3:267–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith AM, Urbanosky LR, Castle JA, Rushing JT, Ruch DS. Radius pull test: predictor of longitudinal forearm instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;11:1970–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sowa DT, Hotchkiss RN, Weiland AJ. Symptomatic proximal translation of the radius following radial head resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;317:106–13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Failla JM, Jacobson J, van Holsbeeck M. Ultrasound diagnosis and surgical pathology of the torn interosseous membrane in forearm fractures/dislocations. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;2:257–66.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaakkola JI, Riggans DH, Lourie GM, Lang CJ, Elhassan BT, Rosenthal SJ. Ultrasonography for the evaluation of forearm interosseous membrane disruption in a cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;6:1053–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuoka J, Beppu M, Nakajima H, Aoki H. Ultrasonography for the interosseous membrane of the forearm. Hand Surg. 2003;2:227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soubeyrand M, Lafont C, Oberlin C, France W, Maulat I, Degeorges R. The "muscular hernia sign": an original ultrasonographic sign to detect lesions of the forearm’s interosseous membrane. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;4:372–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fester EW, Murray PM, Sanders TG, Ingari JV, Leyendecker J, Leis HL. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting disruptions of the forearm interosseous membrane: a cadaver study. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;3:418–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hausmann JT, Vekszler G, Breitenseher M, Braunsteiner T, Vecsei V, Gabler C. Mason type-I radial head fractures and interosseous membrane lesions-a prospective study. J Trauma. 2009;2:457–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hodler J, Cotten A, Trudell D, Resnick D. Magnetic resonance imaging of the forearm: cross-sectional anatomy in a cadaveric model. Invest Radiol. 1998;1:6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McGinley JC, Roach N, Gaughan JP, Kozin SH. Forearm interosseous membrane imaging and anatomy. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;10:561–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McGinley JC, Roach N, Hopgood BC, Limmer K, Kozin SH. Forearm interosseous membrane trauma: MRI diagnostic criteria and injury patterns. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;5:275–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y. In vivo MR studies of dynamic changes in the interosseous membrane of the forearm during rotation. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;2:245–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Seki T, Yamazaki N. Normal kinematics of the interosseous membrane during forearm pronation-supination–a three-dimensional MRI study. Hand Surg. 2000;1:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Yamazaki N. In vivo motion analysis of forearm rotation utilizing magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon). 1999;5:315–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Yamazaki N. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of forearm: a new method using fuzzy reasoning. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;3:463–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Starch DW, Dabezies EJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;2:235–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hodler J, Yu JS, Steinert HC, Resnick D. MR imaging versus alternative imaging techniques. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1995;4:591–608.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nazarian LN. The top 10 reasons musculoskeletal sonography is an important complementary or alternative technique to MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;6:1621–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Noda K, Goto A, Murase T, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H, Moritomo H. Interosseous membrane of the forearm: an anatomical study of ligament attachment locations. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;3:415–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Markolf KL, Lamey D, Yang S, Meals R, Hotchkiss R. Radioulnar load-sharing in the forearm. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;6:879–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McGinley JC, D’Addessi L, Sadeghipour K, Kozin SH. Mechanics of the antebrachial interosseous membrane: response to shearing forces. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;4:733–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McGinley JC, Kozin SH. Interosseous membrane anatomy and functional mechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;383:108–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rozental TD, Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ. Longitudinal radioulnar dissociation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;1:68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Ultrasound and the diagnosis of orthopaedic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;6:944–51.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Abdelwahab IF. High-frequency ultrasound examination of the wrist and hand. Skeletal Radiol. 1999;3:121–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jacobson JA. Musculoskeletal sonography and MR imaging. A role for both imaging methods. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999;4:713–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zanetti M, Hodler J. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) of tendon injuries. Orthopade. 1995;3:200–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Rodriguez-Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodriguez-Martin, J., Pretell-Mazzini, J. The role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the forearm interosseous membrane. A review. Skeletal Radiol 40, 1515–1522 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1190-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1190-7

Keywords

Navigation