Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 102, Issue 16, pp 7183–7194 | Cite as

Chlorination caused a shift in marine biofilm niches on microfiltration/ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membranes and UV irradiation effectively inactivated a chlorine-resistant bacterium

  • Kyungjin Cho
  • Dawoon Jeong
  • Seockheon Lee
  • Hyokwan Bae
Environmental biotechnology

Abstract

The effect of chlorine disinfection on marine biofilm populations and communities formed on membrane surfaces was investigated under two feedwater conditions: raw seawater and deep bed filtration-treated seawater. As a result of chlorination, the structure of the biofilm community on the microfiltration/ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane coupons shifted significantly at the genus level. However, the total bacterial population was not reduced under the two feedwater conditions. This failure to control the biofilm was attributed to the adaptation and survival of selected bacteria under chlorine stress. Phaeobacter caeruleus, isolated from the biofilm, was examined as a representative chlorine-resistant biofilm-forming bacterium. The number of viable P. caeruleus was significantly reduced (as much as 99.8%) after ultraviolet (UV) disinfection. The results indicated that additional disinfection by UV irradiation can inactivate chlorine-resistant bacteria. Therefore, tandem chlorination-UV disinfection may enhance the efficiency of biofouling control in seawater reverse osmosis processes. The synergistic effects of tandem chlorination-UV irradiation on the marine biofilm community should be investigated in future studies.

Keywords

Seawater reverse osmosis Biofouling Chlorination UV disinfection Biofilm-forming bacteria Phaeobacter caeruleus 

Notes

Funding information

This research received financial support from the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (2Z04140). This research was also supported by a grant (code 17IFIP-B065893-05) from Industrial Facilities & Infrastructure Research Program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

253_2018_9111_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (852 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 852 kb)

References

  1. Bae H, Jeong D, Kim H, Kim S, Lee S (2014) Dynamic shift in community structures of biofilm-forming bacteria by the pre-treatment systems of seawater reverse osmosis processes. Desalination 343:17–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben Rajeb A, Mehri I, Nasr H, Najjari A, Saidi N, Hassen A (2017) Nitrifying–denitrifying filters and UV-C disinfection reactor: a combined system for wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 38(6):762–771.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1230651 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boon N, Pycke BFG, Marzorati M, Hammes F (2011) Nutrient gradients in a granular activated carbon biofilter drives bacterial community organization and dynamics. Water Res 45(19):6355–6361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridier A, Briandet R, Thomas V, Dubois-Brissonnet F (2011) Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants: a review. Biofouling 27(9):1017–1032.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2011.626899 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao Y, Mao Y, Wang Z, Zhang T (2015) Diversity and functions of bacterial community in drinking water biofilms revealed by high-throughput sequencing. Sci Rep 5(10044).  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10044
  6. Cho K, Jeong S, Kim H, Choi K, Lee S, Bae H (2016) Simultaneous dechlorination and disinfection using vacuum UV irradiation for SWRO process. Desalination 398:22–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi DH, Park JS, Hwang CY, Huh SH, Cho BC (2002) Effects of thermal effluents from a power station on bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates in coastal waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 229:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps229001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi DH, Noh JH, Yu OH, Kang YS (2010) Bacterial diversity in biofilms formed on condenser tube surfaces in a nuclear power plant. Biofouling 26(8):953–959.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2010.533267 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chun Y, Ha PT, Powell L, Lee J, Kim D, Choi D, Lovitt RW, Kim IS, Mitra SS, Chang IS (2012) Exploring microbial communities and differences of cartridge filters (CFs) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes for seawater desalination processes. Desalination 298(0):85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Azizi IM, Omran AAM (2003) Design criteria of 10,000 m3/d SWRO desalination plant of Tajura, Libya. Desalination 153(1–3):273–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)01146-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gabriel AA, Ballesteros MLP, Rosario LMD, Tumlos RB, Ramos HJ (2018) Elimination of Salmonella enterica on common stainless steel food contact surfaces using UV-C and atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Food Control 86:90–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray MJ, Wholey W-Y, Jakob U (2013) Bacterial responses to reactive chlorine species. Annu Rev Microbiol 67:141–160.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-102912-142520 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu JY, Song LF, Ong SL, Phua ET, Ng WJ (2005) Biofiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in a water reclamation system. Chemosphere 59(1):127–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.096 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Inkinen J, Jayaprakash B, Ahonen M, Pitkanen T, Makinen R, Pursiainen A, Domingo JWS, Salonen H, Elk M, Keinanen-Toivola MM (2018) Bacterial community changes in copper and PEX drinking water pipeline biofilms under extra disinfection and magnetic water treatment. J Appl Microbiol 124(2):611–624.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13662 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeong S, Vigneswaran S (2013) Assessment of biological activity in contact flocculation filtration used as a pretreatment in seawater desalination. Chem Eng J 228:976–983.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeong S, Park Y, Lee S, Kim J, Lee K, Lee J, Chon H-T (2011) Pre-treatment of SWRO pilot plant for desalination using submerged MF membrane process: trouble shooting and optimization. Desalination 279(1–3):86–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeong S, Bae H, Naidu G, Jeong D, Lee S, Vigneswaran S (2013) Bacterial community structure in a biofilter used as a pretreatment for seawater desalination. Ecol Eng 60:370–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeong S, Cho K, Bae H, Keshvardoust P, Rice SA, Vigneswaran S, Lee S, Leiknes T (2016a) Effect of microbial community structure on organic removal and biofouling in membrane adsorption bioreactor used in seawater pretreatment. Chem Eng J 294:30–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeong S, Vollprecht R, Cho K, Leiknes T, Vigneswaran S, Bae H, Lee S (2016b) Advanced organic and biological analysis of dual media filtration used as a pretreatment in a full-scale seawater desalination plant. Desalination 385:83–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeong S, Cho K, Jeong D, Lee S, Leiknes T, Vigneswaran S, Bae H (2017) Effect of engineered environment on microbial community structure in biofilter and biofilm on reverse osmosis membrane. Water Res 124:227–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jia S, Shi P, Hu Q, Li B, Zhang T, Zhang X-X (2015) Bacterial community shift drives antibiotic resistance promotion during drinking water chlorination. Environ Sci Technol 49(20):12271–12279.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan MT, Manes C-LO, Aubry C, Croué J-P (2013) Source water quality shaping different fouling scenarios in a full-scale desalination plant at the Red Sea. Water Res 47(2):558–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kharazmi A, Giwercman B, Høiby N (1999) Robbins device in biofilm research. Methods Enzymol 310. Academic Press:207–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kollu K, Örmeci B (2015) Monitoring simulated bioflocculation: application of micro-flow imaging technology. Water Air Soil Pollut 226(3):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2299-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levi A, Bar-Zeev E, Elifantz H, Berman T, Berman-Frank I (2016) Characterization of microbial communities in water and biofilms along a large scale SWRO desalination facility: site-specific prerequisite for biofouling treatments. Desalination 378:44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liyanaarachchi S, Shu L, Muthukumaran S, Jegatheesan V, Baskaran K (2014) Problems in seawater industrial desalination processes and potential sustainable solutions: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 13(2):203–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-013-9326-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luo W, Chen A, Chen M, Dong W, Hou X (2014) Comparison of sterilization efficiency of pulsed and continuous UV light using tunable frequency UV system. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 26(0):220–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2014.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manes CLO, West N, Rapenne S, Lebaron P (2011) Dynamic bacterial communities on reverse-osmosis membranes in a full-scale desalination plant. Biofouling 27(1):47–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2010.536980 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Matin A, Khan Z, Zaidi SMJ, Boyce MC (2011) Biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes for seawater desalination: phenomena and prevention. Desalination 281:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCune B, Grace JB, Urban DL (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. Montoya-Pachongo C, Douterelo I, Noakes C, Camargo-Valero MA, Sleigh A, Escobar-Rivera JC, Torres-Lozada P (2018) Field assessment of bacterial communities and total trihalomethanes: implications for drinking water networks. Sci Total Environ 616:345–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.254 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Murphy HM, Payne SJ, Gagnon GA (2008) Sequential UV- and chlorine-based disinfection to mitigate Escherichia coli in drinking water biofilms. Water Res 42(8–9):2083–2092.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.12.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nadkarni MA, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N (2002) Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 148(1):257–266.  https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-1-257 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nebot E, Casanueva JF, Casanueva T, Fernandez-Baston MM, Sales D (2006) In situ experimental study for the optimization of chlorine dosage in seawater cooling systems. Appl Therm Eng 26(16):1893–1900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saeed MO, Jamaluddin AT, Tisan IA, Lawrence DA, Al-Amri MM, Chida K (2000) Biofouling in a seawater reverse osmosis plant on the Red Sea coast, Saudi Arabia. Desalination 128(2):177–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-9164(00)00032-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Santo Domingo JW, Meckes MC, Simpson JM, Sloss B, Reasoner DJ (2003) Molecular characterization of bacteria inhabiting a water distribution system simulator. Water Sci Technol 47(5):149–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Santo D, Graça A, Nunes C, Quintas C (2018) Escherichia coli and Cronobacter sakazakii in ‘Tommy Atkins’ minimally processed mangos: survival, growth and effect of UV-C and electrolyzed water. Food Microbiol 70:49–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.09.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shemesh M, Kolter R, Losick R (2010) The biocide chlorine dioxide stimulates biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis by activation of the histidine kinase KinC. J Bacteriol 192(24):6352–6356.  https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01025-10 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Shi P, Jia S, Zhang X-X, Zhang T, Cheng S, Li A (2013) Metagenomic insights into chlorination effects on microbial antibiotic resistance in drinking water. Water Res 47(1):111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stewart PS (2003) Diffusion in biofilms. J Bacteriol 185(5):1485–1491.  https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.5.1485-1491.2003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Strempel N, Nusser M, Neidig A, Brenner-Weiss G, Overhage J (2017) The oxidative stress agent hypochlorite stimulates c-di-gmp synthesis and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 8(2311).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02311
  42. Strom PF, Matulewich VA, Finstein MS (1976) Concentrations of nitrifying bacteria in sewages, effluents, and a receiving stream and resistance of these organisms to chlorination. Appl Environ Microbiol 31(5):731–737PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Sun W, Liu W, Cui L, Zhang M, Wang B (2013) Characterization and identification of a chlorine-resistant bacterium, Sphingomonas TS001, from a model drinking water distribution system. Sci Total Environ 458–460:169–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vandecandelaere I, Segaert E, Mollica A, Faimali M, Vandamme P (2009) Phaeobacter caeruleus sp nov., a blue-coloured, colony-forming bacterium isolated from a marine electroactive biofilm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:1209–1214.  https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.002642-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang H, Hu C, Hu X (2014) Effects of combined UV and chlorine disinfection on corrosion and water quality within reclaimed water distribution systems. Eng Fail Anal 39:12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weiner RM, Melick M, O'Neill K, Quintero E (2000) Hyphomonas adhaerens sp. nov., Hyphomonas johnsonii sp. nov. and Hyphomonas rosenbergii sp. nov., marine budding and prosthecate bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50(2):459–469.  https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-2-459 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams MM, Domingo JWS, Meckes MC, Kelty CA, Rochon HS (2004) Phylogenetic diversity of drinking water bacteria in a distribution system simulator. J Appl Microbiol 96(5):954–964.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02229.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu H, Zhang J, Mi Z, Xie S, Chen C, Zhang X (2015) Biofilm bacterial communities in urban drinking water distribution systems transporting waters with different purification strategies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(4):1947–1955.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6095-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Xavier Simon F, Berdalet E, Gracia FA, Espana F, Llorens J (2014) Seawater disinfection by chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite. A comparison of biofilm formation. Water Air Soil Pollut 225(4).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-1921-1
  50. Xie RJ, Tan EK, Lim SK, Haw E, Chiew CP, Sivaraman A, Puah AN, Lau YH, Teo CP (2009) Pre-treatment optimisation of SWRO membrane desalination under tropical conditions. Desalin Water Treat 3(1–3):183–192.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xing J, Wang H, Cheng X, Tang X, Luo X, Wang J, Wang T, Li G, Liang H (2018) Application of low-dosage UV/chlorine pre-oxidation for mitigating ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouling in natural surface water treatment. Chem Eng J 344:62–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu J, Tang W, Ma J, Wang H (2017) Comparison of microbial community shifts in two parallel multi-step drinking water treatment processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(13):5531–5541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8258-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu Y, Wang HB, Li XX, Hu C, Yang M, Qu JH (2014) Characterization of biofilm and corrosion of cast iron pipes in drinking water distribution system with UV/cl-2 disinfection. Water Res 60:174–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Water Resource Cycle ResearchKorea Institute of Science and TechnologySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringYonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPusan National UniversityBusanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations