Genetic characterization and modification of a bioethanol-producing yeast strain
Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from different sources generally show extensive genetic and phenotypic diversity. Understanding how genomic variations influence phenotypes is important for developing strategies with improved economic traits. The diploid S. cerevisiae strain NY1308 is used for cellulosic bioethanol production. Whole genome sequencing identified an extensive amount of single nucleotide variations and small insertions/deletions in the genome of NY1308 compared with the S288c genome. Gene annotation of the assembled NY1308 genome showed that 43 unique genes are absent in the S288c genome. Phylogenetic analysis suggested most of the unique genes were obtained through horizontal gene transfer from other species. RNA-Seq revealed that some unique genes were not functional in NY1308 due to unidentified intron sequences. During bioethanol fermentation, NY1308 tends to flocculate when certain inhibitors (derived from the pretreatment of cellulosic feedstock) are present in the fermentation medium. qRT-PCR and genetic manipulation confirmed that the novel gene, NYn43, contributed to the flocculation ability of NY1308. Deletion of NYn43 resulted in a faster fermentation rate for NY1308. This work disclosed the genetic characterization of a bioethanol-producing S. cerevisiae strain and provided a useful paradigm showing how the genetic diversity of the yeast population would facilitate the personalized development of desirable traits.
KeywordsCellulosic ethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae Whole genome sequencing RNA-Seq Unique genes
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401058 and 31370132) and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY18C060002).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Akao T, Yashiro I, Hosoyama A, Kitagaki H, Horikawa H, Watanabe D, Akada R, Ando Y, Harashima S, Inoue T, Inoue Y, Kajiwara S, Kitamoto K, Kitamoto N, Kobayashi O, Kuhara S, Masubuchi T, Mizoguchi H, Nakao Y, Nakazato A, Namise M, Oba T, Ogata T, Ohta A, Sato M, Shibasaki S, Takatsume Y, Tanimoto S, Tsuboi H, Nishimura A, Yoda K, Ishikawa T, Iwashita K, Fujita N, Shimoi H (2011) Whole-genome sequencing of sake yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kyokai no. 7. DNA Res 18(6):423–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsr029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Argueso JL, Carazzolle MF, Mieczkowski PA, Duarte FM, Netto OV, Missawa SK, Galzerani F, Costa GG, Vidal RO, Noronha MF, Dominska M, Andrietta MG, Andrietta SR, Cunha AF, Gomes LH, Tavares FC, Alcarde AR, Dietrich FS, McCusker JH, Petes TD, Pereira GA (2009) Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res 19(12):2258–2270. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.091777.109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ (2011) Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 7(2):e1001287. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001287 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Galeote V, Novo M, Salema-Oom M, Brion C, Valerio E, Goncalves P, Dequin S (2010) FSY1, a horizontally transferred gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 wine yeast strain, encodes a high-affinity fructose/H+ symporter. Microbiology 156(12):3754–3761. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.041673-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitichantaropas Y, Boonchird C, Sugiyama M, Kaneko Y, Harashima S, Auesukaree C (2016) Cellular mechanisms contributing to multiple stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with potential use in high-temperature ethanol fermentation. AMB Express 6(1):107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0285-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Koutinas A, Kanellaki M, Bekatorou A, Kandylis P, Pissaridi K, Dima A, Boura K, Lappa K, Tsafrakidou P, Stergiou P-Y (2016) Economic evaluation of technology for a new generation biofuel production using wastes. Bioresour Technol 200:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.093 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nijkamp JF, van den Broek M, Datema E, de Kok S, Bosman L, Luttik MA, Daran-Lapujade P, Vongsangnak W, Nielsen J, Heijne WH, Klaassen P, Paddon CJ, Platt D, Kotter P, van Ham RC, Reinders MJ, Pronk JT, de Ridder D, Daran JM (2012) De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology. Microb Cell Factories 11(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silveira MH, Morais AR, da Costa Lopes AM, Olekszyszen DN, Bogel-Lukasik R, Andreaus J, Pereira Ramos L (2015) Current pretreatment technologies for the development of cellulosic ethanol and biorefineries. ChemSusChem 8(20):3366–3390. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201500282 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strope PK, Skelly DA, Kozmin SG, Mahadevan G, Stone EA, Magwene PM, Dietrich FS, McCusker JH (2015) The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res 25(5):762–774. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.185538.114 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Zheng DQ, Wu XC, Tao XL, Wang PM, Li P, Chi XQ, Li YD, Yan QF, Zhao YH (2011) Screening and construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with improved multi-tolerance and bioethanol fermentation performance. Bioresour Technol 102(3):3020–3027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.122 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng DQ, Chen J, Zhang K, Gao KH, Li O, Wang PM, Zhang XY, Du FG, Sun PY, Qu AM, Wu S, Wu XC (2014) Genomic structural variations contribute to trait improvement during whole-genome shuffling of yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(7):3059–3070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5423-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar