Skip to main content
Log in

Perforations associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in a neonatal population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in neonates but perforations can result in devastating complications such as pericardial and pleural effusions. Identifying risk factors may guide surveillance and reduce morbidity and mortality.

Objective

To determine the risk factors for PICC perforation in neonates.

Materials and methods

Retrospective case:control (1:2) study of neonates admitted between 2004-2014. Charts and imaging were reviewed for clinical and therapeutic risk factors.

Results

Among 3,454 PICCs, 15 cases of perforation (incidence 0.4%, 5 pericardial effusions, 10 pleural effusions) were matched to 30 controls, based on gestation and insertion date. Timing of perforations post-insertion was median 4 days for pericardial effusions and 21.5 days for pleural effusions. A risk factor for pericardial effusion was lower weight at PICC insertion compared with controls. There were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls in catheter material, insertion site, PICC size and lumen number. Among upper limb PICCs, pericardial effusions were associated with tip positions more proximal to the heart at insertion (P=0.005) and at perforation (P=0.008), compared with controls. Pleural effusions were associated with tip positions more distal from the heart at perforation (P=0.008). Within 48 h before perforation, high/medium risk infusions included total parenteral nutrition (100% cases vs. 56.7% controls, P=0.002) and vancomycin (60% cases vs. 23.3% controls, P=0.02).

Conclusion

PICC-associated pericardial effusions and pleural effusions are rare but inherent risks and can occur at any time after insertion. Risk factors and etiologies are multifactorial, but PICC tip position may be a modifiable risk factor. To mitigate this risk, we have developed and disseminated guidelines for target PICC positions and routinely do radiographs to monitor PICCs for migration and malposition in our NICU. The increased knowledge of risk profiles from this study has helped focus surveillance efforts and facilitate early recognition and treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hogan M (1999) Neonatal vascular catheters and their complications. Radiol Clin North Am 37:1109–1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Menon G (2003) Neonatal long lines. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F260–F262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pettit J (2002) Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: part 1. Detecting the most frequently occurring complications. Adv Neonatal Care 2:304–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Camara D (2001) Minimizing risks associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in the NICU. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 26:17–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pettit J (2003) Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: part 2. Detecting less frequently occurring complications. Adv Neonatal Care 3:14–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beardsall K, White DK, Pinto EM et al (2003) Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade as complications of neonatal long lines: are they really a problem? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F292–F295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nadroo AM, Glass RB, Lin J et al (2002) Changes in upper extremity position cause migration of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Pediatrics 110:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Otten TR, Stein PD, Patel KC et al (2003) Thromboembolic disease involving the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic veins. Chest 123:809–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A et al (2013) Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 382:311–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Health (2001) Review of four neonatal deaths due to cardiac tamponade associated with the presence of a central venous catheter. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nowlen TT, Rosenthal GL, Johnson GL et al (2002) Pericardial effusion and tamponade in infants with central catheters. Pediatrics 110:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Booth SA, Norton B, Mulvey DA (2001) Central venous catheterization and fatal cardiac tamponade. Br J Anaesth 87:298–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gravenstein N, Blackshear RH (1991) In vitro evaluation of relative perforating potential of central venous catheters: comparison of materials, selected models, number of lumens and angles of incidence to simulated membrane. J Clin Monit 7:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Orme RM, McSwiney MM, Chamberlain-Webber RF (2007) Fatal cardiac tamponade as a result of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter: a case report and review of the literature. Br J Anaesth 99:384–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark E, Giambra BK, Hingle J et al (2013) Reducing risk of harm from extravasation: a 3-tiered evidence based list of pediatric peripheral intravenous infusates. J Infus Nurs 36:37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuster M, Nave H, Piepenbrock S et al (2000) The carina as a landmark in central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth 85:192–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baskin KM, Jimenez RM, Cahill AM et al (2008) Cavoatrial junction and central venous anatomy: implications for central venous access tip position. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:359–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Towbin R (2008) The bowed catheter sign: a risk for pericardial tamponade. Pediatr Radiol 38:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leipälä JA, Petäjä J, Fellman V (2001) Perforation complications of percutaneous central venous catheters in very low birthweight infants. J Paediatr Child Health 37:168–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Soe A (2007) Central venous catheterization in newborn infants. Infantry 3:172–175

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cartwright DW (2004) Central venous lines in neonates: a study of 2186 catheters. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89:F504–F508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pezzati M, Filippi L, Chiti G et al (2004) Central venous catheters and cardiac tamponade in preterm infants. Intensive Care Med 30:2253–2256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Madhavi P, Jameson R, Robinson MJ (2000) Unilateral pleural effusion complicating central venous catheterization. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 82:F248–F249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Barbosa M, Rocha G, Flor-de-Lima F, Guimaraes H (2015) Neonatal pleural effusions in a Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. JPNIM 4:e040123

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sridhar S, Thomas N, Kumar ST, Jana AK (2005) Neonatal hydrothorax following migration of a central venous catheter. Indian J Pediatr 72:795–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shenoy R (2008) Cardiac tamponade following central line in premature neonate: case report and review of the literature. Internet J Pediatr Neonatal 10:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shih YT, Su PH, Chen JY et al (2011) Common etiologies of neonatal pleural effusion. Pediatr Neonatol 52:251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Srinivasan HB, Tjin-A-Tam A, Galang R et al (2013) Migration patterns of peripherally inserted central venous catheters at 24 hours postinsertion in neonates. Am J Perinatol 30:871–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Connolly B, Mawson JB, MacDonald CE et al (2000) Fluoroscopic landmark for SVC-RA junction for central venous catheter placement in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:692–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson ND (2012) Lower limb PICC tip target position https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/-/media/cincinnati%2520childrens/home/service/v/vascular-access/hcp/lower%2520limb%2520picc.pdf%3Fla%3Den+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=safari. Accessed 17 Aug 2017

  31. Johnson ND (2012) Upper limb PICC tip target position https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/-/media/cincinnati%2520childrens/home/service/v/vascular-access/hcp/upper%2520limb%2520picc.pdf%3Fla%3Den+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=safari. Accessed 17 Aug 2017

  32. Fletcher SJ, Bodenham AR (2000) Safe placement of central venous catheters: where should the tip of the catheter lie? Br J Anaesth 85:188–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wrightson DD (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites. Adv Neonatal Care 13:198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gaballah M, Krishnamurthy G, Keller MS et al (2014) US-guided placement and tip position confirmation for lower-extremity central venous access in neonates and infants with comparison versus conventional insertion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:548–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gaballah M, Krishnamurthy G, Berman JI et al (2015) Lower extremity vascular access in neonates and infants: a single institutional experience. Vasc Interv Radiol 26:1660–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nadroo AM, Lin J, Green RS et al (2001) Death as a complication of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. J Pediatr 138:599–601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyong-Soon Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sertic, A.J., Connolly, B.L., Temple, M.J. et al. Perforations associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in a neonatal population. Pediatr Radiol 48, 109–119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3983-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3983-x

Keywords

Navigation