Radiation risk index for pediatric CT: a patient-derived metric
- 559 Downloads
There is a benefit in characterizing radiation-induced cancer risk in pediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT: a singular metric that represents the whole-body radiation burden while also accounting for age, gender and organ sensitivity.
To compute an index of radiation risk for pediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT.
Materials and methods
Using a protocol approved by our institutional review board, 42 pediatric patients (age: 0-16 years, weight: 2-80 kg) were modeled into virtual whole-body anatomical models. Organ doses were estimated for clinical chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations of the patients using validated Monte Carlo simulations of two major scanner models. Using age-, size- and gender-specific organ risk coefficients, the values were converted to normalized effective dose (by dose length product) (denoted as the k factor) and a normalized risk index (denoted as the q factor). An analysis was performed to determine how these factors are correlated with patient age and size for both males and females to provide a strategy to better characterize individualized risk.
The k factor was found to be exponentially correlated with the average patient diameter. For both genders, the q factor also exhibited an exponential relationship with both the average patient diameter and with patient age. For both factors, the differences between the scanner models were less than 8%.
The study defines a whole-body radiation risk index for chest and abdominopelvic CT imaging, that incorporates individual estimated organ dose values, organ radiation sensitivity, patient size, exposure age and patient gender. This indexing metrology enables the assessment and potential improvement of chest and abdominopelvic CT performance through surveillance of practice dose profiles across patients and may afford improved informed communication.
KeywordsChildren Computed tomography Effective dose Radiation dose Radiation risk
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
- 1.Bahador B (1996) Trends in diagnostic imaging to 2000. Urch Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.IMV (2012) CT Market Outlook Report. IMV Medical Information Division, Des Plaines, ILGoogle Scholar
- 7.National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation — BEIR VII. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 10.AAPM (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations, AAPM report no. 204. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
- 14.International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, ICRP publication 103. Essen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bogdanich W (2009) Radiation overdoses point up dangers of CT scans. In the New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/us/16radiation.html
- 16.Bogdanich W (2011) West Virginia hospital over radiated brain scan patients, records show. In the New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/06/health/06radiation.html?_r=3
- 24.Segars WP, Sturgeon G, et al (2009). Patient specific computerized phantoms to estimate dose in pediatric CT. SPIE Proceedings, p 72580HGoogle Scholar
- 25.ICRP (2002) Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values, ICRP publication 89. International Commission on Radiological Protection, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 33.The State of California SB 1237 (2010) Available at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1237_bill_20100929_chaptered.html
- 35.The Joint Commission (2011) Sentinel Event Alert, Issue 47, Aug 24, 2011Google Scholar
- 38.American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011). AAPM position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging procedures Available at http://www.aapm.org/org/policies/details.asp?id=318&type=PP
- 42.Peck DJ, Samei E (2017) American College of Radiology: How to understand and communicate radiation risk. http://www.imagewisely.org/imaging-modalities/computed-tomography/medical-physicists/articles/how-to-understand-and-communicate-radiation-risk. Accessed 07 Aug 2017