Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 47, Issue 13, pp 1776–1786 | Cite as

Serial changes in anatomy and ventricular function on dual-source cardiac computed tomography after the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome

  • Hyun Woo GooEmail author
Original Article



Accurate evaluation of anatomy and ventricular function after the Norwood procedure in hypoplastic left heart syndrome is important for treatment planning and prognostication, but echocardiography and cardiac MRI have limitations.


To assess serial changes in anatomy and ventricular function on dual-source cardiac CT after the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Materials and methods

In 14 consecutive patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, end-systolic and end-diastolic phase cardiac dual-source CT was performed before and early (average: 1 month) after the Norwood procedure, and repeated late (median: 4.5 months) after the Norwood procedure in six patients. Ventricular functional parameters and indexed morphological measurements including pulmonary artery size, right ventricular free wall thickness, and ascending aorta size on cardiac CT were compared between different time points. Moreover, morphological features including ventricular septal defect, endocardial fibroelastosis and coronary ventricular communication were evaluated on cardiac CT.


Right ventricular function and volumes remained unchanged (indexed end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes: 38.9±14.0 vs. 41.1±21.5 ml/m2, P=0.7 and 99.5±30.5 vs. 105.1±33.0 ml/m2, P=0.6; ejection fraction: 60.1±7.3 vs. 63.8±7.0%, P=0.1, and indexed stroke volume: 60.7±18.0 vs. 64.0±15.6 ml/m2, P=0.5) early after the Norwood procedure, but function was decreased (ejection fraction: 64.2±2.6 vs. 58.1±7.1%, P=0.01) and volume was increased (indexed end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes: 39.2±14.9 vs. 68.9±20.6 ml/m2, P<0.003 and 107.8±36.5 vs. 162.9±36.2 ml/m2, P<0.006, and indexed stroke volume: 68.6±21.7 vs. 94.0±21.3 ml/m2, P=0.02) later. Branch pulmonary artery size showed a gradual decrease without asymmetry after the Norwood procedure. Right and left pulmonary artery stenoses were identified in 21.4% (3/14) of the patients. Indexed right ventricular free wall thickness showed a significant increase early after the Norwood procedure (25.5±3.5 vs. 34.8±5.1 mm/m2, P=0.01) and then a significant decrease late after the Norwood procedure (34.8±5.1 vs. 27.2±4.2 mm/m2, P<0.0001). The hypoplastic ascending aorta smaller than 2 mm in diameter was identified in 21.4% (3/14) of the patients. Ventricular septal defect (n=3), endocardial fibroelastosis (n=2) and coronary ventricular communication (n=1) were detected on cardiac CT.


Cardiac CT can be used to assess serial changes in anatomy and ventricular function after the Norwood procedure in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.


Child Computed tomography Heart Hypoplastic left heart syndrome Norwood procedure Ventricular function 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Barron DJ, Kilby MD, Davies B et al (2009) Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Lancet 374:551–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fonseca BM (2013) Perioperative imaging in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 17:117–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khoo NS, Smallhorn JF, Kaneko S et al (2011) Novel insights into RV adaptation and function in hypoplastic left heart syndrome between the first 2 stages of surgical palliation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:128–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim DS, Peeler BB, Matherne GP et al (2008) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of pulmonary artery growth and ventricular function after Norwood procedure with Sano modification. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellsham-Revell HR, Tibby SM, Bell AJ et al (2013) Serial magnetic resonance imaging in hypoplastic left heart syndrome gives valuable insight into ventricular and vascular adaptation. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:561–570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellsham-Revell HR, Simpson JM, Miller OI et al (2013) Subjective evaluation of right ventricular systolic function in hypoplastic left heart syndrome: how accurate is it? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:52–56CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhodes JF, Asnes JD, Blaufox AD et al (2000) Impact of low body weight on frequency of pediatric cardiac catheterization complications. Am J Cardiol 86:1275–1278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goo HW (2010) State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 11:4–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goo HW (2011) Cardiac MDCT in children: CT technology overview and interpretation. Radiol Clin N Am 49:997–1010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goo HW (2013) Current trends in cardiac CT in children. Acta Radiol 54:1055–1062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bradley SM, Erdem CC, Hsia TY et al (2008) Right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt: alternative palliation in infants with inadequate pulmonary blood flow prior to two-ventricle repair. Ann Thorac Surg 86:183–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goo HW, Allmendinger T (2017) Combined ECG- and respiratory-triggered CT of the lung to reduce respiratory misregistration artifacts between imaging slabs in free-breathing children: initial experience. Korean J Radiol 18:860–866.
  13. 13.
    Goo HW (2011) Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 41:839–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goo HW (2012) CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 13:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koch K, Oellig F, Oberholzer K et al (2005) Assessment of right ventricular function by 16-detector-row CT: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 15:312–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goo HW, Park S (2015) Semiautomatic three-dimensional CT ventricular volumetry in patients with congenital heart disease: agreement between two methods with different user interaction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:223–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Menon SC, Minich LL, Casper TC et al (2011) Regional myocardial dysfunction following Norwood with right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:826–833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geva T (2011) Repaired tetralogy of Fallot: the roles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluating pathophysiology and for pulmonary valve replacement decision support. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rich S (2012) Right ventricular adaptation and maladaptation in chronic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cardiol Clin 30:257–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaplinski M, Cohen MS (2015) Characterising adequacy or inadequacy of the borderline left ventricle: what tools can we use? Cardiol Young 25:1482–1488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grosse-Wortmann L, Yun TJ, Al-Radi O et al (2008) Borderline hypoplasia of the left ventricle in neonates: insights for decision-making from functional assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:1429–1436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim HJ, Goo HW, Park SH et al (2013) Left ventricle volume measured by cardiac CT in an infant with a small left ventricle: a new and accurate method in determining uni- or biventricular repair. Pediatr Radiol 43:243–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shuhaiber JH, Pigula FA (2013) Left ventricle after palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: friend, fiend, or innocent bystander? Pediatr Cardiol 34:1063–1072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arnold RR, Loukanov T, Gorenflo M (2014) Hypoplastic left heart syndrome - unresolved issues. Front Pediatr 2:125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goo HW, Yang DH (2010) Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronized spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol 40:1670–1680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Noel CV, Kovalchin JP, Adler B et al (2014) Incidence of tracheobronchial anomalies found with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Congenit Heart Dis 9:294–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Biglino G, Giardini A, Hsia TY et al (2013) Modeling single ventricle physiology: review of engineering tools to study first stage palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Front Pediatr 1:31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Qian Y, Liu L, Itatani K et al (2010) Computational hemodynamic analysis in congenital heart disease: simulation of the Norwood procedure. Ann Biomed Eng 38:2302–2313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Research Institute of RadiologyUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations