Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of CT enterography and MR enterography imaging features of active Crohn disease in children and adolescents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Assessment for active Crohn disease by CT enterography and MR enterography relies on identifying mural and perienteric imaging features.

Objective

To evaluate the performance of established imaging features of active Crohn disease in children and adolescents on CT and MR enterography compared with histological reference.

Materials and methods

We included patients ages 18 years and younger who underwent either CT or MR enterography from 2007 to 2014 and had endoscopic biopsy within 28 days of imaging. Two pediatric radiologists blinded to the histological results reviewed imaging studies and scored the bowel for the presence or absence of mural features (wall thickening >3 mm, mural hyperenhancement) and perienteric features (mesenteric hypervascularity, edema, fibrofatty proliferation and lymphadenopathy) of active disease. We performed univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression to compare imaging features with histological reference.

Results

We evaluated 452 bowel segments (135 from CT enterography, 317 from MR enterography) from 84 patients. Mural imaging features had the highest association with active inflammation both for MR enterography (wall thickening had 80% accuracy, 69% sensitivity and 91% specificity; mural hyperenhancement had 78%, 53% and 96%, respectively) and CT enterography (wall thickening had 84% accuracy, 72% sensitivity and 91% specificity; mural hyperenhancement had 76%, 51% and 91%, respectively), with perienteric imaging features performing significantly worse on MR enterography relative to CT enterography (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Mural features are predictors of active inflammation for both CT and MR enterography, while perienteric features can be distinguished better on CT enterography compared with MR enterography. This likely reflects the increased conspicuity of the mesentery on CT enterography and suggests that mural features are the most reliable imaging features of active Crohn disease in children and adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Floyd DN, Langham S, Séverac HC et al (2015) The economic and quality-of-life burden of Crohn's disease in Europe and the United States, 2000 to 2013: a systematic review. Dig Dis Sci 60:299–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benchimol EI, Fortinsky KJ, Gozdyra P et al (2011) Epidemiology of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of international trends. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17:423–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgart DC, Carding SR (2007) Inflammatory bowel disease: cause and immunobiology. Lancet 369:1627–1640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Loftus EV Jr (2004) Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology 126:1504–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Diefenbach KA, Breuer CK (2006) Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 12:3204–3212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Maglinte DD, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D et al (2003) Classification of small bowel Crohn’s subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin N Am 41:285–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark M, Colombel JF, Feagan BC et al (2007) American Gastroenterological Association consensus development conference on the use of biologics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, June 21–23, 2006. Gastroenterography 133:312–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Spinelli A, Correale C, Szabo H et al (2010) Intestinal fibrosis in Crohn's disease: medical treatment or surgery? Curr Drug Targets 11:242–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anupindi SA, Grossman AB, Nimkin K et al (2014) Imaging in the evaluation of the young patient with inflammatory bowel disease: what the gastroenterologist needs to know. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 59:429–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin DR, Lauenstein T, Sitaraman SV (2007) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in small bowel Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 133:385–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK et al (2009) Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 251:751–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gee MS, Nimkin K, Hsu M et al (2011) Prospective evaluation of MR enterography as the primary imaging modality for pediatric Crohn disease assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:224–231

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Quencer KB, Nimkin K, Mino-Kenudson M et al (2013) Detecting active inflammation and fibrosis in pediatric Crohn's disease: prospective evaluation of MR-E and CT-E. Abdom Imaging 38:705–713

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dillman JR, Adler J, Zimmermann EM et al (2010) CT enterography of pediatric Crohn disease. Pediatr Radiol 40:97–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oommen J, Oto A (2011) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging 36:134–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anupindi SA, Podberesky DJ, Towbin AJ et al (2015) Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: imaging issues with targeted solutions. Abdom Imaging 40:975–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moy MP, Sauk J, Gee MS (2016) The role of MR enterography in assessing Crohn's disease activity and treatment response. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016:8168695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smolinski S, George M, Dredar A et al (2014) Magnetic resonance enterography in evaluation and management of children with Crohn's disease. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 35:331–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Qiu Y, Mao R, Chen BL et al (2014) Systematic review with meta-analysis: magnetic resonance enterography vs. computed tomography enterography for evaluating disease activity in small bowel Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 40:134–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mollard BJ, Smith EA, Lai ME et al (2016) MR enterography under the age of 10 years: a single institutional experience. Pediatr Radiol 46:43–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kilcoyne A, Kaplan JL, Gee MS (2016) Inflammatory bowel disease imaging: current practice and future directions. World J Gastroenterol 22:917–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG et al (2009) Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:113–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA et al (2009) Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252:200–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. The R Foundation (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 1 Mar 2017

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huprich JE, Rosen MP, Fidler JL et al (2010) ACR appropriateness criteria on Crohn's disease. J Am Coll Radiol 7:94–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hammer MR, Podberesky DJ, Dillman JR (2013) Multidetector computed tomographic and magnetic resonance enterography in children: state of the art. Radiol Clin N Am 51:615–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Makanyanga JC, Taylor SA (2013) Current and future role of MR enterography in the management of Crohn disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:56–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Duigenan S, Gee MS (2012) Imaging of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:907–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Towbin AJ, Sullivan J, Denson LA et al (2013) CT and MR enterography in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics 33:1843–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather I. Gale.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gale, H.I., Sharatz, S.M., Taphey, M. et al. Comparison of CT enterography and MR enterography imaging features of active Crohn disease in children and adolescents. Pediatr Radiol 47, 1321–1328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3876-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3876-z

Keywords

Navigation