Abstract
With its soft-tissue definition, multiplanar capabilities and advanced imaging techniques, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for neonatal care can provide better understanding of pathology, allowing for improved care and counseling to families. However, MR imaging in neonates is often difficult due to patient instability and the complex support necessary for survival. In our institution, we have installed a small footprint magnet in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to minimize patient risks and provide the ability to perform MR imaging safely in this population. With this system, we have been able to provide more information with regard to central nervous system disorders, abdominal pathology, and pulmonary and airway abnormalities, and have performed postmortem imaging as an alternative or supplement to pathological autopsy. In our experience, an MR scanner situated within the NICU has allowed for safer and more expedited imaging of this vulnerable population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loepke AW (2010) Developmental neurotoxicity of sedatives and anesthetics: a concern for neonatal and pediatric critical care medicine? Pediatr Crit Care Med 11:217–226
Dumoulin C, Rohling KW, Piel JE et al (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging compatible incubator. Concepts Magn Reson 15:117–128
Blüml S, Friedlich P, Erberich S et al (2004) MR imaging of newborns by using an MR-compatible incubator with integrated radiofrequency coils: initial experience. Radiology 231:594–601
Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Lonneker-Lammers T et al (2004) Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of the neonate in a magnetic resonance-compatible incubator with a built-in coil. Pediatrics 113:e150–e152
Tkach JA, Li Y, Pratt RG et al (2014) Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system. Pediatr Radiol 44:1011–1019
Tkach JA, Merhar SL, Kline-Fath BM et al (2014) MRI in the neonatal ICU: initial experience using a small-footprint 1.5-T system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W95–W105
Tkach JA, Hillman NH, Jobe AH et al (2012) An MRI system for imaging neonates in the NICU: initial feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 42:1347–1356
Allegaert K, Naulaers G (2008) Procedural sedation of neonates with chloral hydrate: a sedation procedure does not end at the end of the acquisition of the images. Paediatr Anaesth 18:1270–1271
Woodward LJ, Anderson PJ, Austin NC et al (2006) Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 355:685–694
Mirmiran M, Barnes PD, Keller K et al (2004) Neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging before discharge is better than serial cranial ultrasound in predicting cerebral palsy in very low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatrics 114:992–998
Maalouf EF, Duggan PJ, Counsell SJ et al (2001) Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatrics 107:719–727
Inder TE, Anderson NJ, Spencer C et al (2003) White matter injury in the premature infant: a comparison between serial cranial sonographic and MR findings at term. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:805–809
De Vries LS, Van Haastert IL, Rademaker KJ et al (2004) Ultrasound abnormalities preceding cerebral palsy in high-risk preterm infants. J Pediatr 144:815–820
Nongena P, Ederies A, Azzopardi DV et al (2010) Confidence in the prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome by cranial ultrasound and MRI in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 95:F388–F390
Miller SP, Ferriero DM, Leonard C et al (2005) Early brain injury in premature newborns detected with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with adverse early neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr 147:609–616
Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Taylor A et al (2010) Cerebral magnetic resonance biomarkers in neonatal encephalopathy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 125:e382–e395
van den Heuvel MP, Kersbergen KJ, de Reus MA et al (2015) The neonatal connectome during preterm brain development. Cereb Cortex 25:3000–3013
Keunen K, Kersbergen KJ, Groenendaal F et al (2012) Brain tissue volumes in preterm infants: prematurity, perinatal risk factors and neurodevelopmental outcome: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:89–100
Smyser CD, Inder TE, Shimony JS et al (2010) Longitudinal analysis of neural network development in preterm infants. Cereb Cortex 20:2852–2862
Chau V, Synnes A, Grunau RE et al (2013) Abnormal brain maturation in preterm neonates associated with adverse developmental outcomes. Neurology 81:2082–2089
Huisman TA, Rossi A, Tortori-Donati P (2012) MR imaging of neonatal spinal dysraphia: what to consider? Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 20:45–61
Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY et al (2011) A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 364:993–1004
Higano NS, Hahn AD, Tkach JA et al (2016) Retrospective respiratory self-gating and removal of bulk motion in pulmonary UTE MRI of neonates and adults. Magn Reson Med 77:1284–1295
Walkup LL, Tkach JA, Higano NS et al (2015) Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in theneonatal intensive care unit environment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 192:1215–1222
Lequin MH, Huisman TA (2012) Postmortem MR imaging in the fetal and neonatal period. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 20:129–143
Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS et al (2013) Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 382:223–233
Montaldo P, Addison S, Oliveira V et al (2016) Quantification of maceration changes using post mortem MRI in fetuses. BMC Med Imaging 16:34
Addison S, Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S (2014) Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice. Br J Radiol 87:20130621
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Merhar, S.L., Tkach, J.A., Woods, J.C. et al. Neonatal imaging using an on-site small footprint MR scanner. Pediatr Radiol 47, 1001–1011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3855-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3855-4