Abstract
Background
With incremental utilization of pediatric cardiac CT in congenital heart disease, it is imperative to define its current radiation dose levels in clinical practice in order to help imagers optimize CT protocols, particularly in Asia and other developing countries where CT physicists are not readily available.
Objective
To evaluate current radiation dose levels and influencing factors in cardiac CT in children with congenital heart disease in Asia by conducting a retrospective multi-center, multi-vendor study.
Materials and methods
We included 1,043 pediatric cardiac CT examinations performed in 8 centers between January 2014 and December 2014 to evaluate congenital heart disease. In five weight groups, we calculated radiation dose metrics including volume CT dose index, size-specific dose estimate, dose–length product and effective dose. Age at CT exam, gender, tube voltage, scan mode, CT indication and image reconstruction algorithm were analyzed to learn whether they influenced CT radiation dose.
Results
Volume CT dose index, size-specific dose estimate, dose–length product and effective dose of pediatric cardiac CT showed variations in the range of 4.3–23.8 mGy, 4.9–17.6 mGy, 55.8–501.3 mGy∙cm and 1.5–3.2 mSv, respectively, within five weight groups. Gender, tube voltage, scan mode and cardiac function assessment significantly influenced CT radiation dose.
Conclusion
This multi-center, multi-vendor study demonstrated variations in radiation dose metrics of pediatric cardiac CT reflecting current practice in Asia. Gender, tube voltage, scan mode and cardiac function assessment should be considered as essential radiation dose-influencing factors in developing optimal pediatric cardiac CT protocols.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2003) CT of congenital heart disease: normal and typical pathologic conditions. Radiographics 23:S147–S165
Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2005) Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Card Imaging 21:347–365
Goo HW, Seo DM, Yun TJ et al (2009) Coronary artery anomalies and clinically important anatomy in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 39:265–273
Goo HW (2010) State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 11:4–18
Goo HW, Yang DH (2010) Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronized spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol 40:1670–1680
Goo HW (2013) Current trends in cardiac CT in children. Acta Radiol 54:1055–1062
Goo HW, Park SH, Koo HJ et al (2014) Atresia of the bilateral pulmonary veins: a rare and dismal anomaly identified on cardiac CT. Pediatr Radiol 44:942–947
Goo HW, Park JJ, Kim EA et al (2014) Cardiac fusion and complex cardiac defects in thoracopagus twins: diagnostic value of cardiac CT. Pediatr Radiol 44:1169–1174
Goo HW (2011a) Haemodynamic findings on cardiac CT in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 41:250–261
Kim HJ, Goo HW, Park SH et al (2013) Left ventricle volume measured by cardiac CT in an infant with a small left ventricle: a new and accurate method in determining uni- or biventricular repair. Pediatr Radiol 43:243–246
Goo HW, Park SH (2015) Semiautomatic three-dimensional CT ventricular volumetry in patients with congenital heart disease: agreement between two methods with different user interaction. Int J Card Imaging 31:223–232
Tsai IC, Goo HW (2013) Cardiac CT and MRI for congenital heart disease in Asian countries: recent trends in publication based on a scientific database. Int J Card Imaging 29:1–5
Goo HW (2012) CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 13:1–11
Ghoshhajra BB, Lee AM, Engel LC et al (2014) Radiation dose reduction in pediatric cardiac computed tomography: experience from a tertiary medical center. Pediatr Cardiol 35:171–179
Lee E, Goo HW, Lee JY et al (2015) Age- and gender-specific estimates of cumulative CT dose over 5 years using real radiation dose tracking data in children. Pediatr Radiol 45:1282–1292
Verdum FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986
Thomas KE (2011) CT utilization — trends and developments beyond the United States’ borders. Pediatr Radiol 41:S562–S566
Kritsaneepaiboon S, Trinavarat P, Visrutaratna P et al (2012) Survey of pediatric MDCT radiation dose from university hospitals in Thailand: a preliminary for national dose survey. Acta Radiol 53:820–826
Vassileva J, Rehani MM, Applegate K et al (2013) IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols. Eur Radiol 23:623–631
Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A et al (2011) Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology 261:779–786
Geleijns J, Joemai RM, Dewey M et al (2011) Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64). AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1126–1132
Hausleiter J, Meyer TS, Martuscelli E et al (2012) Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:484–493
Deseive S, Pugliese F, Meave A et al (2015) Image quality and radiation dose of a prospectively electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch data acquisition strategy for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, randomized PROTECTION IV study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:278–285
Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Neefjes LA et al (2009) Preserved diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with reduced radiation exposure and cancer risk. Radiology 252:53–60
McCollough CH (2003) Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography. Herz 28:1–6
Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH et al (2010) Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting international commission on radiological protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:881–889
Huda W, Magill D, He W et al (2011) CT effective dose per dose length product using ICRP 103 weighting factors. Med Phys 38:1261–1265
Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA et al (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166
Strauss KJ, Goske MJ (2011) Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol 41:S472–S482
International Commission on Radiation Units & Measurements (2005) Patient dosimetry for x rays used in medical imaging. J ICRU 5:i
Brady SL, Kaufman RA (2012) Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology 265:832–840
Nie P, Wang X, Cheng Z et al (2012) The value of low-dose prospective ECG-gated dual-source CT angiography in the diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta in infants and children. Clin Radiol 67:738–745
Nie P, Yang G, Wang X et al (2014) Application of prospective ECG-gated high-pitch 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in the diagnosis of congenital extracardiac vascular anomalies in infants and children. PLoS One 9:e115793
Huang MP, Liang CH, Zhao ZJ et al (2011) Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose at prospective ECG-triggered axial 256-slice multi-detector CT in infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 41:858–866
Ben Saad M, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A et al (2009) Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose of thoracic and coronary dual-source CT in 110 infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 39:668–676
Paul JF, Rohnean A, Elfassy E et al (2011) Radiation dose for thoracic and coronary step-and-shoot CT using a 128-slice dual-source machine in infants and small children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 41:244–249
Goo HW, Suh DS (2006a) Tube current reduction in non-electrocardiography-gated heart CT by combined tube current modulation in children. Pediatr Radiol 36:344–351
Goo HW, Suh DS (2006b) The influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation: a phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 36:833–840
Noferini L, Fulcheri C, Taddeucci A et al (2014) Considerations on the practical application of the size-specific dose estimation (SSDE) method of AAPM report 204. Radiol Phys Technol 7:296–302
Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V et al (2014) Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:123–130
Brady SL, Mirro AE, Moore BM et al (2015) How to appropriately calculate effective dose for CT using either size-specific dose estimates or dose-length product. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:953–958
Gabusi M, Riccardi L, Aliberti C et al (2016) Radiation dose in chest CT: assessment of size-specific dose estimates based on water-equivalent correction. Phytopathol Mediterr 32:393–397
Goo HW (2011b) Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 41:839–847
Moore BM, Brady SL, Mirro AE et al (2014) Size-specific dose estimate provides a simple method to calculate organ dose for pediatric CT examinations. Med Phys 41:071917
Acknowledgments
We thank Martin W. M. Law, PhD, Department of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, HKSAR, China, for his help with statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hui, P.K.T., Goo, H.W., Du, J. et al. Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD). Pediatr Radiol 47, 899–910 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3847-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3847-4