Abstract
The modern radiology department is built around the flow of information. Ordering providers request imaging studies to be performed, technologists complete the work required to perform the imaging studies, and radiologists interpret and report on the imaging findings. As each of these steps is performed, data flow between multiple information systems, most notably the radiology information system (RIS), the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and the voice dictation system. Even though data flow relatively seamlessly, the majority of our systems and processes are inefficient. The purpose of this article is to describe the radiology value stream and describe how radiology informaticists in one department have worked to improve the efficiency of the value stream at each step. Through these examples, we identify and describe several themes that we believe have been crucial to our success.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Larson DB, Froehle CM, Johnson ND et al (2014) Communication in diagnostic radiology: meeting the challenges of complexity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:957–964
Business Dictionary (2017) Value stream http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/value-stream.html. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Mabotuwana T, Lee MC, Cohen-Solal EV et al (2014) Mapping institution-specific study descriptions to RadLex playbook entries. J Digit Imaging 27:321–330
Rau JAJ (2011) Many hospitals overuse double CT scans, data show. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/many-hospitals-overuse-double-ct-scans-data-shows/2011/06/16/AGvpTAaH_story.html?utm_term=.6970a1de591d. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Graham J (2010) New government report raises questions about CT scans at Illinois hospitals. Chicago Tribune. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-07-11/health/ct-met-hospital-outpatient-20100709_1_ct-scans-edward-hospital-hospital-outpatient. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM et al (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250
Larson DB, Trout AT, Fierke SR et al (2015) Improvement in diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound of the pediatric appendix through the use of equivocal interpretive categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:849–856
Halsted MJ, Froehle CM (2008) Design, implementation, and assessment of a radiology workflow management system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:321–327
Towbin AJ, Hall S, Moskovitz J et al (2011) Creating a comprehensive customer service program to help convey critical and acute results of radiology studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W48–W51
Senge PM (2006) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Revised and updated, Doubleday/Currency, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Towbin, A.J., Perry, L.A. & Larson, D.B. Improving efficiency in the radiology department. Pediatr Radiol 47, 783–792 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3828-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3828-7