References
Adamsbaum C, Morel B, Ducot B et al (2014) Dating the abusive head trauma episode and perpetrator statements: key points for imaging. Pediatr Radiol 44 Suppl 4:S578–S588
Sargent S, Kennedy JG, Kaplan JA (1996) “Hyperacute” subdural hematoma: CT mimic of recurrent episodes of bleeding in the setting of child abuse. J Forensic Sci 41:314–316
Jaspan T (2008) Current controversies in the interpretation of non-accidental head injury. Pediatr Radiol 38:S378–S387
Demaerel P (2012) MR imaging in inflicted brain injury. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 20:35–44
Bradford R, Choudhary AK, Dias MS (2013) Serial neuroimaging in infants with abusive head trauma: timing abusive injuries. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:110–119
Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Postema FA, Verbaan D et al (2014) Age determination of subdural hematomas with CT and MRI: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 83:1257–1268
Colquhoun D (2014) An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values. R Soc Open Sci 1:140216
Koopman PAR (1984) Confidence intervals for the ratio of two binomial proportions. Biometrics 40:513–517
Stoel RD, Sjerps MJ (2012) Interpretation of forensic evidence. In: Roeser S, Hillerbrand R, Sandin P, Peterson M (eds) Handbook of risk theory: epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk. Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 135–158
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bilo, R.A.C., Nijs, H.G.T. & Stoel, R.D. Statistical significance does not imply (forensic medical) relevance. Pediatr Radiol 47, 628–629 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3803-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3803-3