Abstract
Background
Colonic volvulus is rare in children and associated with colonic dysmotility. Diagnosis of colonic volvulus on radiographs in these patients can be challenging. The purpose of the study was to identify the accuracy of abdominal radiographs and findings suggestive of colonic volvulus.
Materials and methods
A retrospective (2003- 2014) study of all children with colonic volvulus proven surgically or endoscopically reviewed their medical charts for underlying disease and clinical presentation as well as their original radiograph reports. Two pediatric radiologists (reader 1 and reader 2) independently reviewed the radiographs. The kappa test was used to evaluate interobserver variability.
Results
There were 19 cases of colonic volvulus in 18 patients (11 males) a mean age 14 years. Cecal volvulus was the most common finding at 14/19 cases (74%). Sixteen of 18 (89%) patients had neurological impairment and 10 of 18 (56%) had intestinal dysmotility. The most common presentation was abdominal distension (14/19 [74%]) and pain (11/19 [58%]). Colonic volvulus was diagnosed in only 7/16 (44%) of the abdominal radiographs. The specific finding of a coffee-bean sign was retrospectively observed only by reader 2 in two cases. Absence of rectal gas and focal colonic loop dilation were the most common findings by the readers (average 73.5% and 87%, respectively) with Kappa values of 0.3 and 0.38, respectively.
Conclusion
Diagnosis of colonic volvulus in children can be challenging. Radiologists should be alerted to the possibility of colonic volvulus when there is focal colonic loop distention or absent rectal gas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Kang CY et al (2014) Colonic volvulus in the United States: trends, outcomes, and predictors of mortality. Ann Surg 259:293–301
Mellor MF, Drake DG (1994) Colonic volvulus in children: value of barium enema for diagnosis and treatment in 14 children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1157–1159
Brothers TE, Strodel WE, Eckhauser FE (1987) Endoscopy in colonic volvulus. Ann Surg 206:1–4
Hiltunen KM, Syrja H, Matikainen M (1992) Colonic volvulus. Diagnosis and results of treatment in 82 patients. Eur J Surg 158:607–611
Altaf MA, Werlin SL, Sato TT et al (2009) Colonic volvulus in children with intestinal motility disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 49:59–62
Husain K, Fitzgerald P, Lau G (1994) Cecal volvulus in the Cornelia de Lange syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 29:1245–1247
De Betue CT, Boersma D, Oomen MW et al (2011) Volvulus as a complication of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome. Eur J Pediatr 170:1591–1595
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381
Folaranmi SE, Cho A, Tareen F et al (2012) Proximal large bowel volvulus in children: 6 new cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 47:1572–1575
Park ES, Park CI, Cho SR et al (2004) Colonic transit time and constipation in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:453–456
Pahlman L, Enblad P, Rudberg C et al (1989) Volvulus of the colon. A review of 93 cases and current aspects of treatment. Acta Chir Scand 155:53–56
Samuel M, Boddy SA, Nicholls E et al (2000) Large bowel volvulus in childhood. Aust N Z J Surg 70:258–262
Herndon CD, Rink RC, Cain MP et al (2004) In situ Malone antegrade continence enema in 127 patients: a 6-year experience. J Urol 172:1689–1691
Asabe K, Ushijima H, Bepu R et al (2002) A case of transverse colon volvulus in a child and a review of the literature in Japan. J Pediatr Surg 37:1626–1628
Image Gently (2014) Image Gently and SPR. http://imagegently.org/. Accessed 9 May 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marine, M.B., Cooper, M.L., Delaney, L.R. et al. Diagnosis of pediatric colonic volvulus with abdominal radiography: how good are we?. Pediatr Radiol 47, 404–410 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3781-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3781-5