Skip to main content
Log in

How accurate is size-specific dose estimate in pediatric body CT examinations?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Size-specific dose estimate is gaining increased acceptance as the preferred index of CT dose in children. However it was developed based on non-clinical data.

Objective

To compare the accuracy of size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) based on geometric and body weight measures in pediatric chest and abdomen CT scans, versus the more accurate \( \overline{\mathrm{SSDE}} \) (mean SSDE based on water-equivalent diameter).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified 50 consecutive children (age <18 years) who underwent chest CT examination and 50 children who underwent abdomen CT. We measured anteroposterior diameter (DAP) and lateral diameter (DLAT) at the central slice (of scan length) of each patient and calculated DAP+LAT (anteroposterior diameter plus lateral diameter) and DED (effective diameter) for each patient. We calculated the following in each child: (1) SSDEs based on DAP, DLAT, DAP+LAT, DED, and body weight, and (2) SSDE based on software calculation of mean water-equivalent diameter (\( \overline{\mathrm{SSDE}} \) adopted standard within our study). We used intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis to compare agreement between the SSDEs and \( \overline{\mathrm{SSDE}} \).

Results

Gender and age distribution were similar between chest and abdomen CT groups; mean body weight was 37 kg for both groups, with ranges of 6–130 kg (chest) and 8–107 kg (abdomen). SSDEs had very strong agreement (ICC>0.9) with \( \overline{\mathrm{SSDE}} \). SSDEs based on DLAT had 95% limits of agreement of up to 43% with \( \overline{\mathrm{SSDE}} \). SSDEs based on other parameters (body weight, DAP, DAP+LAT, DED) had 95% limits of agreement of up to 25%.

Conclusion

Differences between SSDEs calculated using various indications of patient size (geometric indices and patient weight) and the more accurate \( \overline{\mathrm{SSDE}} \) calculated using proprietary software were generally small, with the possible exception for lateral diameter, and provide acceptable dose estimates for body CT in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality? Radiology 223:5–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berdon WE, Slovis TL (2002) Where we are since ALARA and the series of articles on CT dose in children and risk of long-term cancers: what has changed? Pediatr Radiol 32:699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W et al (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120:677–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huda W, Mettler FA (2011) Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology 258:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2015) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. AAPM report No. 204. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2016

  6. McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L et al (2011) CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 259:311–316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Strauss KJ, Goske MJ (2011) Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol 41:472–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leng S, Shiung M, Duan X et al (2015) Size-specific dose estimates for chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT: effect of intrapatient variability in water-equivalent diameter. Radiology 276:184–190

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Christianson O, Li X, Frush D et al (2012) Automated size-specific CT dose monitoring program: assessing variability in CT dose. Med Phys 39:7131–7139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brady SL, Mirro AE, Moore BM et al (2015) How to appropriately calculate effective dose for CT using either size-specific dose estimates or dose-length product. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:953–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Christner JA, Braun NN, Jacobsen MC et al (2012) Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso. Radiology 265:841–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCollough C, Bakalyar DM, Bostani M et al (2015) Use of water equivalent diameter for calculating patient size and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in CT. AAPM Report No. 220. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_220.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2016

  13. Khawaja RD, Singh S, Vettiyil B et al (2015) Simplifying size-specific radiation dose estimates in pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:167–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strauss KJ (2014) Dose indices: everybody wants a number. Pediatr Radiol 44:450–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pourjabbar S, Singh S, Padole A et al (2014) Size-specific dose estimates: localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images? World J Radiol 6:210–217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J, Christner JA, Duan X et al (2012) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. Med Phys 39:6772–6678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boaz Karmazyn.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karmazyn, B., Ai, H., Klahr, P. et al. How accurate is size-specific dose estimate in pediatric body CT examinations?. Pediatr Radiol 46, 1234–1240 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3604-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3604-0

Keywords

Navigation