Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pediatric interventional radiology clinic – how are we doing?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Development of a pediatric interventional radiology clinic is a necessary component of providing a pediatric interventional radiology service. Patient satisfaction is important when providing efficient, high-quality care.

Objective

To analyze the care provided by a pediatric interventional radiology clinic from the perspective of efficiency and parent satisfaction, so as to identify areas for improvement.

Materials and methods

The prospective study was both quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative component measured clinic efficiency (waiting times, duration of clinic visit, nurse/physician time allocation and assessments performed; n = 91). The qualitative component assessed parental satisfaction with their experience with the pediatric interventional radiology clinic, using a questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and optional free text section for feedback (n = 80). Questions explored the family’s perception of relevance of information provided, consent process and overall satisfaction with their pediatric interventional radiology clinic experience.

Results

Families waited a mean of 11 and 10 min to meet the physician and nurse, respectively. Nurses and physicians spent a mean of 28 and 21 min with the families, respectively. The average duration of the pediatric interventional radiology clinic consultation was 56 min. Of 80 survey participants, 83% were satisfied with their experience and 94% said they believed providing consent before the day of the procedure was helpful. Only 5% of respondents were not satisfied with the time-efficiency of the interventional radiology clinic.

Conclusion

Results show the majority of patients/parents are very satisfied with the pediatric interventional radiology clinic visit. The efficiency of the pediatric interventional radiology clinic is satisfactory; however, adherence to stricter scheduling can be improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (2014) ACR–SIR–SPR Practice parameter for interventional clinical practice and management. ACT Res 118. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACT/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Interventional_Clinical_Practice.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2016

  2. Bagla S, Mitchell NL, Sansivero GE et al (2004) The interventional radiology clinic: key ingredients for success. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:681–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lord DJ (2011) The practice of pediatric interventional radiology. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 14:2–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baskin KM, Hogan MJ, Sidhu MK et al (2011) Developing a clinical pediatric interventional practice: a joint clinical practice guideline from the society of interventional radiology and the society for pediatric interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1648–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cleary PD, McNeil BJ (1988) Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 25:25–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, Ordway L et al (1992) Antecedents of adherence to medical recommendations: results from the medical outcomes study. J Behav Med 15:447–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Brien MK, Petrie K, Raeburn J (1992) Adherence to medication regiments: updating a complex medical issue. Med Care Rev 49:435–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anumula N, Sanelli PC (2012) Hospital outpatient quality reporting program. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:225–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chlabicz S, Grębowski R, Marcinowicz L (2009) Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology. BMC Health Serv Res 9:63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Detsky J, Shaul RZ (2013) Incentives to increase patient satisfaction: are we doing more harm than good? CMAJ 185:1199–1200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cleary P (1999) The increasing importance of patient surveys. BMJ 319:720–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Denham C, Johnson CD, Krecke KN et al (2009) Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer. Radiographics 29:951–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abujudeh H, Aran S, Quencer K et al (2013) Patient satisfaction in radiology: qualitative analysis of written complaints generated over a 10-year period in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Radiol 10:513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcin JP, McSwain SD (2014) Telemedicine for the care of children in the hospital setting. Pediatr Ann 43:e44–e49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chamberlin J, Jackson JL, Kroenke K (2001) Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 52:609–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bogoch ER, Cooney B, Johnston B et al (2000) Improving patient satisfaction with time spent in an orthopedic outpatient clinic. Can J Surg 43:431–436

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Calderon J, Fajardo R, Lopez C et al (2011) A telephone survey of patient satisfaction with realtime telemedicine in a rural community in Colombia. J Telemed Telecare 17:83–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boughner R (2010) Volunteer bias. In: Salkind N (ed) Encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 1609–1611

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gribble R, Haupt C (2005) Quantitative and qualitative differences between handout and mailed patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care 43:276–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bairbre L. Connolly.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubenstein, J., Zettel, J.C., Lee, E. et al. Pediatric interventional radiology clinic – how are we doing?. Pediatr Radiol 46, 1165–1172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3593-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3593-z

Keywords

Navigation