Skip to main content
Log in

IVC filter retrieval in adolescents: experience in a tertiary pediatric center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are commonly implanted with the intent to prevent life-threatening pulmonary embolism in at-risk patients with contraindications to anticoagulation. Various studies have reported increases in the rate of venous thromboembolism within the pediatric population. The utility and safety of IVC filters in children has not yet been fully defined.

Objective

To describe the technique and adjunctive maneuvers of IVC filter removal in children, demonstrate its technical success and identify complications.

Materials and methods

A retrospective 10-year review was performed of 20 children (13 male, 7 female), mean age: 15.1 years (range: 12-19 years), who underwent IVC filter retrieval. Eleven of 20 (55%) were placed in our institution. Electronic medical records were reviewed for filter characteristics, retrieval technique, technical success and complications.

Results

The technical success rate was 100%. Placement indications included: deep venous thrombosis with a contraindication to anticoagulation (10/20, 50%), free-floating thrombus (4/20, 20%), post-trauma pulmonary embolism prophylaxis (3/20, 15%) and pre-thrombolysis pulmonary patient (1/20, 5%). The mean implantation period was 63 days (range: 20-270 days). Standard retrieval was performed in 17/20 patients (85%). Adjunctive techniques were performed in 3/20 patients (15%) and included the double-snare technique, balloon assistance and endobronchial forceps retrieval. Median procedure time was 60 min (range: 45-240 min). Pre-retrieval cavogram demonstrated filter tilt in 5/20 patients (25%) with a mean angle of 17° (range: 8-40). Pre-retrieval CT demonstrated strut wall penetration and tip embedment in one patient each. There were two procedure-related complications: IVC mural dissection noted on venography in one patient and snare catheter fracture requiring retrieval in one patient. There were no early or late complications.

Conclusion

In children, IVC filter retrieval can be performed safely but may be challenging, especially in cases of filter tilt or embedding. Adjunctive techniques may increase filter retrieval rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chalmers EA (2006) Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in neonates and children. Thromb Res 118:3–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson C, Alomari AI, Chaudry G (2011) Detachment of introducer sheath radiopaque marker during retrieval of G2 filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34:431–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raffini L, Cahill AM, Hellinger J (2008) A prospective observational study of IVC filters in pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:517–520

  4. Takemoto CM, Sohi S, Desai K et al (2014) Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism in children: incidence and clinical characteristics. J Pediatr 164:332–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caplin DM, Nikolic B, Kalva SP et al (2011) Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1499–1506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB et al (2006) Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:200–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kukreja KU, Gollamudi J, Patel MN et al (2011) Inferior vena cava filters in children: our experience and suggested guidelines. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 33:334–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaudry G, Padua HM, Alomari AI (2008) The use of inferior vena cava filters in young children. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1103–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sridhar AV, Rao NK, Chakraborty S (2005) A six-year old with fatal pulmonary embolism. Acta Paediatr 94:977–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunta S, Kamath S (2012) A case of pulmonary embolism and stroke in a 16-year-old girl. WMJ 111:58–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nazzal M, Chan E, Nazzal M et al (2010) Complications related to inferior vena cava filters: a single-center experience. Ann Vasc Surg 24:480–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmad I, Yeddula K, Wicky S et al (2010) Clinical sequelae of thrombus in an inferior vena cava filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:285–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Durack JC, Westphalen AC, Kekulawela S et al (2012) Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Gunther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:299–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Malgor RD, Hines GL, Terrana L et al (2012) Persistent abdominal pain caused by an inferior vena cava filter protruding into the duodenum and the aortic wall. Ann Vasc Surg 26:e3–e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarosiek S, Crowther M, Sloan JM (2013) Indications, complications, and management of inferior vena cava filters: the experience in 952 patients at an academic hospital with a level I trauma center. JAMA Intern Med 173:513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rimon U, Bensaid P, Golan G et al (2011) Optease vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34:532–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Hakim R, Kee ST, Olinger K et al (2014) Inferior vena cava filter retrieval: effectiveness and complications of routine and advanced techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:933–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Charles HW, Black M, Kovacs S et al (2009) G2 inferior vena cava filter: retrievability and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1046–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Doody O, Given MF, Kavnoudias H et al (2009) Initial experience in 115 patients with the retrievable Cook Celect vena cava filter. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 53:64–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoppe H, Nutting CW, Smouse HR et al (2006) Gunther Tulip filter retrievability multicenter study including CT follow-up: final report. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1017–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dixon A, Stavropoulos SW (2013) Improving retrieval rates for retrievable inferior vena cava filters. Expert Rev Med Devices 10:135–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Binkert CA, Bansal A, Gates JD (2005) Inferior vena cava filter removal after 317-day implantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:395–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McConville RM, Kennedy PT, Collins AJ et al (2009) Failed retrieval of an inferior vena cava filter during pregnancy because of filter tilt: report of two cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:174–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Turba UC, Arslan B, Meuse M et al (2010) Gunter tulip filter retrieval experience: predictors of successful retrieval. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:732–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Looby S, Given MF, Geoghegan T et al (2007) Gunther Tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filters: indications, efficacy, retrieval, and complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30:59–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu X, Tam MD, Bartholomew J et al (2011) Retrievability and device-related complications of the G2 filter: a retrospective study of 139 filter retrievals. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:806–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JK, So YH, Choi YH et al (2014) Clinical course and predictive factors for complication of inferior vena cava filters. Thromb Res 133:538–543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bogue CO, John PR, Connolly BL et al (2009) Symptomatic caval penetration by a Celect inferior vena cava filter. Pediatr Radiol 39:1110–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oh JC, Trerotola SO, Dagli M et al (2011) Removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters with computed tomography findings indicating tenting or penetration of the inferior vena cava wall. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hull JE, Han J, Giessel GM (2008) Retrieval of the recovery filter after arm perforation, fracture, and migration to the right ventricle. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1107–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hull JE, Robertson SW (2009) Bard Recovery filter: evaluation and management of vena cava limb perforation, fracture, and migration. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nathani N, Barzallo M, Mungee S (2010) Myopericarditis secondary to embolization of fractured inferior vena cava filter limbs. J Invasive Cardiol 22:E225–E228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chandra PA, Nwokolo C, Chuprun D et al (2008) Cardiac tamponade caused by fracture and migration of inferior vena cava filter. South Med J 101:1163–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vink TW, Reekers JA, Van Dijk LC et al (2012) Balloon-assisted retrieval of tilted OptEase IVC filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:975–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Ha TG, Vinokur O, Lorenz J et al (2009) Techniques used for difficult retrievals of the Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter: experience in 32 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:92–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lynch FC (2009) Balloon-assisted removal of tilted inferior vena cava filters with embedded tips. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1210–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stavropoulos SW, Dixon RG, Burke CT et al (2008) Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: use of endobronchial forceps. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1297–1301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dinglasan LA, Trerotola SO, Shlansky-Goldberg RD et al (2012) Removal of fractured inferior vena cava filters: feasibility and outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kuo WT, Deso SE, Robertson SW (2013) Vena Tech LGM filter retrieval 16 years after implantation: piecemeal removal by intentional mechanical fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:1731–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kuo WT, Odegaard JI, Louie JD et al (2011) Photothermal ablation with the excimer laser sheath technique for embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: initial results from a prospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:813–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Esparaz AM, Ryu RK, Gupta R et al (2012) Fibrin cap disruption: an adjunctive technique for inferior vena cava filter retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:1233–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony K. Guzman.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr. S. O. Trerotola is a consultant for Bard, Peripheral Vascular Inc., Lutonix Inc., Cook Group Inc., W. L. Gore & Associates, and Teleflex. He receives royalties from Cook and Teleflex. Authors report no other conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guzman, A.K., Zahra, M., Trerotola, S.O. et al. IVC filter retrieval in adolescents: experience in a tertiary pediatric center. Pediatr Radiol 46, 534–540 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3519-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3519-1

Keywords

Navigation