Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiograph in pediatric heart disease: How does it correlate with heart volumes at magnetic resonance imaging?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The cardiothoracic ratio by chest radiograph is widely used as a marker of cardiac size.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to correlate cardiothoracic ratio and cardiac volumes as measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) in common structural and myopathic heart disease with increased cardiac size due to volume overload or hypertrophy.

Material and methods

A retrospective single center study was performed in all patients between 2007 and 2013 with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), aortic regurgitation, isolated left-to-right shunt and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who underwent cardiovascular MR and chest radiograph within 6 months of each other. Cardiothoracic ratios by chest radiograph (frontal and lateral) were compared to cardiac volumes (indexed for body surface area) by cardiovascular MR.

Results

One hundred twenty-seven patients (mean age: 11.2 ± 5.5 years) were included in this study (76 with TOF, 23 with isolated left-to-right shunt, 16 with aortic regurgitation and 12 with HCM). Frontal cardiothoracic ratio of all groups correlated with indexed right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume (EDVI) (r = 0.40, P < 0.01) and indexed total heart volume (THVI) (r = 0.27, P < 0.01). In TOF patients, frontal cardiothoracic ratio correlated with RVEDVI (r = 0.34, P < 0.01; coefficient of variation = 27.6%), indexed RV end-systolic volume (ESVI) (r = 0.44, P < 0.01; coefficient of variation = 33.3%) and THVI (r = 0.35, P < 0.01; coefficient of variation = 19.6%), although RV volumes and THVI showed widespread variation given the high coefficients of variation. In patients with aortic regurgitation, frontal cardiothoracic ratio correlated with left ventricular (LV) EDVI (r = 0.50, P = 0.047), but not with THVI and aortic regurgitant fraction, and widespread variation for LV EDVI (coefficient of variation = 19.2%), LV ESVI (coefficient of variation = 32.5%) and THVI (coefficient of variation = 13.6%) was also observed. Frontal cardiothoracic ratio was not correlated with cardiac volumes or mass in patients with a left-to-right shunt or HCM. Lateral cardiothoracic ratio showed no correlation with any cardiac volume in all four groups.

Conclusion

Although increased cardiothoracic ratio on frontal chest radiograph is associated with increased biventricular volumes in patients with pulmonary and aortic regurgitation, significant variation in ventricular volumes and total heart volume for any given frontal cardiothoracic ratio limits the use of cardiothoracic ratio in monitoring the individual patient’s heart size. Frontal cardiothoracic ratio did not correlate with cardiac chamber volumes in patients with a left-to-right shunt or HCM and lateral cardiothoracic ratio offered no additional value for cardiac size assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EF:

Ejection fraction

EDVI:

End-diastolic volume

ESVI:

End-systolic volume

HCM:

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

LAVI:

Indexed left atrial volume

LVMI:

Indexed left ventricular myocardial mass

LVMVI:

Indexed left ventricular myocardial volume

RAVI:

Indexed right atrial volume

THVI:

Indexed total heart volume

LV:

Left ventricular

Qp:

Pulmonary blood flow

RV:

Right ventricular

Qs:

Systemic blood flow

TOF:

Tetralogy of Fallot

References

  1. Yoo SJ, MacDonald C, Babyn P (2009) Heart size, overall configuration and specific chamber enlargement. In: Chest radiographic interpretation in pediatric cardiac patients. Thieme, New York, pp 79–105

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jun SJ, Jeong HC, Ku YH et al (2013) An optimal cardiothoracic ratio cut-off to predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:1889–1897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimopoulos K, Giannakoulas G, Bendayan I et al (2013) Cardiothoracic ratio from postero-anterior chest radiographs: a simple, reproducible and independent marker of disease severity and outcome in adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 20:453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spiewak M, Małek LA, Biernacka EK et al (2014) Cardiothoracic ratio may be misleading in the assessment of right- and left-ventricular size in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Clin Radiol 69:e1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kono T, Suwa M, Hanada H et al (1992) Clinical significance of normal cardiac silhouette in dilated cardiomyopathy–evaluation based upon echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Jpn Circ J 56:359–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark AL, Coats AJ (2000) Unreliability of cardiothoracic ratio as a marker of left ventricular impairment: comparison with radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography. Postgrad Med J 76:289–291

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukuta H, Ohte N, Brucks S et al (2007) Contribution of right-sided heart enlargement to cardiomegaly on chest roentgenogram in diastolic and systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 99:62–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaman MJ, Sanders J, Crook AM et al (2007) Cardiothoracic ratio within the “normal” range independently predicts mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Heart 93:491–494

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giamouzis G, Sui X, Love TE et al (2008) A propensity-matched study of the association of cardiothoracic ratio with morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 101:343–347

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee W, Yoo SJ, Roche SL et al (2013) Determinants and functional impact of restrictive physiology after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: new insights from magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiol 167:1347–1353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gulati A, Ismail TF, Jabbour A et al (2013) Clinical utility and prognostic value of left atrial volume assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 15:660–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW et al (2007) Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 116:545–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Apitz C, Webb GD, Redington AN (2009) Tetralogy of fallot. Lancet 374:1462–1471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hemingway H, Shipley M, Christie D et al (1998) Cardiothoracic ratio and relative heart volume as predictors of coronary heart disease mortality. The Whitehall study 25 year follow-up. Eur Heart J 19:859–869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maron BJ, Maron MS (2013) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Lancet 381:242–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shi-Joon Yoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grotenhuis, H.B., Zhou, C., Tomlinson, G. et al. Cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiograph in pediatric heart disease: How does it correlate with heart volumes at magnetic resonance imaging?. Pediatr Radiol 45, 1616–1623 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3386-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3386-9

Keywords

Navigation