Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of diagnostic success in image-guided pediatric soft-tissue biopsies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (PCNB) of soft-tissue lesions is a minimally invasive technique that can provide a definitive diagnosis for treatment. Anatomical and age considerations in children require judicious use of safe percutaneous biopsy techniques. There are, however, limited data on the determinants of diagnostic yield in soft-tissue lesions in this population.

Objectives

To assess lesion-related and technical factors that affect diagnostic yield and safety in PCNB of pediatric soft-tissue lesions.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of 205 PCNB performed from January 2000 to July 2014. Diagnostic yield and its associations with technical and lesion-related factors were evaluated using bivariate analysis.

Results

The mean patient age was 11.1 ± 6.9 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.3-16 years). Ultrasound guidance alone was used in 91% of cases. The mean number of passes was 7.5 ± 3.2 (IQR: 5–9 passes) per case. The overall diagnostic yield was 75% and the overall accuracy was 88%. Performing fewer than four passes was associated with a nondiagnostic biopsy (P = 0.001). There were no lesion or other technical factors that predicted a diagnostic biopsy. There were two complications (1%) over 14 years.

Conclusion

Image-guided PCNB is a safe and effective means for the diagnosis of pediatric soft-tissue abnormalities. Aside from performing at least four passes, our data show no technical or lesion-related factors that increase diagnostic yield in pediatric PCNB of soft-tissue lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fraser-Hill MA, Renfrew DL, Hilsentrath PE (1992) Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. 2. Cost-effectiveness. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:813–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skrzynski MC, Biermann JS, Montag A et al (1996) Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:644–649

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF et al (2010) Society of interventional radiology standards of practice committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:969–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barth RJ Jr, Merino MJ, Solomon D et al (1992) A prospective study of the value of core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of soft tissue masses. Surgery 112:536–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Logan PM, Connell DG, O’Connell JX et al (1996) Image-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors: an algorithm for selection of specific biopsy techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol l166:137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu J, Goldsmith JD, Horwich PJ et al (2008) Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core-needle biopsy? Radiology 248:962–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Omura MC, Motamedi K, UyBico S et al (2011) Revisiting CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: contributors to biopsy success. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:457–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shin HJ, Amaral JG, Armstrong D et al (2007) Image-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions in children. Pediatr Radiol 37:362–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Saifuddin A et al (2009) Does image guidance improve accuracy of core needle biopsy in diagnosis of soft tissue tumors? Acta Orthop Belg 75:239–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rougraff B, Aboulafia A, Biermann JS et al (2009) Biopsy of soft tissue masses: evidence-based medicine for the musculoskeletal tumor society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2783–2791

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Govender P, Jonas MM, Alomari A et al (2013) Sonography-guided percutaneous liver biopsies in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:645–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain HK, Kingston JE, Domizio P et al (2001) Imaging-guided core biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant tumors in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:43–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitton B, Seeger LL, Eckardt MA et al (2014) Image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors in children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 36:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sebire NJ, Roebuck DJ (2005) Pathological diagnosis of paediatric tumours from image-guided needle core biopsies: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol 36:426–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tøndel C, Vikse B, Bostad L et al (2012) Safety and complications of percutaneous kidney biopsies in 715 children and 8573 adults in Norway 1988–2010. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1591–1597

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Strauss D, Qureshi Y, Hayes A et al (2010) The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected soft tissue tumours. J Surg Oncol 102:523–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sklair-Levy M, Lebensart PD, Applbaum YH et al (2001) Percutaneous image-guided needle biopsy in children – summary of our experience with 57 children. Pediatr Radiol 31:732–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kasraeian S, Allison D, Ahlmann E et al (2010) A comparison of fine-needle aspiration, core biopsy, and surgical biopsy in the diagnosis of extremity soft tissue masses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2992–3002

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pohlig F, Kirchhoff C, Lenze U et al (2012) Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnosis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res 17:29

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ballah D, Cahill AM, Fontalvo L et al (2011) Vascular anomalies: what they are, how to diagnose them and how to treat them. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 40:233–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gogna A, Peh W, Munk P (2008) Image-guided musculoskeletal biopsy. Radiol Clin N Am 46:455–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF et al (2003) Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S199–S202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peer S, Freuis T, Loizides A et al (2011) Ultrasound guided core needle biopsy of soft tissue tumors: a fool proof technique? Med Ultrason 3:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yao L, Nelson S, Seeger L et al (1999) Primary musculoskeletal neoplasms: effectiveness of core-needle biopsy. Radiology 212:682–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zornoza J, Bernardina M, Ordonez N et al (1982) Percutaneous needle biopsy of soft tissue tumors guided by ultrasound and computed tomography. Skelet Radiol 9:33–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoeber I, Spillane AJ, Fisher C et al (2001) Accuracy of biopsy techniques for limb and limb girdle soft tissue tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 8:80–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koethe Y, Widemann B, Hajjar F et al (2013) PET-guided biopsy with needle navigation facilitates diagnosis of angiosarcoma in Neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:E166–E169

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ilivitzki A, Abugazall M, Arkovitz M et al (2012) Ultrasound-guided core biopsy as the primary tool for tissue diagnosis in pediatric oncology. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 36:333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mankin HJ, Mankin CJ, Simon MA (1996) The hazards of the biopsy, revisited. J Bone Joint Surg 78:656–663

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrew Courtwright, MD, PhD, for statistical assistance and manuscript review.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Acord.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acord, M., Shaikh, R. Predictors of diagnostic success in image-guided pediatric soft-tissue biopsies. Pediatr Radiol 45, 1529–1534 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3364-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3364-2

Keywords

Navigation