Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 69–80 | Cite as

The yield of high-detail radiographic skeletal surveys in suspected infant abuse

  • Ignasi BarberEmail author
  • Jeannette M. Perez-Rossello
  • Celeste R. Wilson
  • Paul K. Kleinman
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Skeletal surveys are routinely performed in cases of suspected child abuse, but there are limited data regarding the yield of high-detail skeletal surveys in infants.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic yield of high-detail radiographic skeletal surveys in suspected infant abuse.

Material and methods

We reviewed the high-detail American College of Radiology standardized skeletal surveys performed for suspected abuse in 567 infants (median: 4.4 months, SD 3.47; range: 4 days-12 months) at a large urban children’s hospital between 2005 and 2013. Skeletal survey images, radiology reports and medical records were reviewed. A skeletal survey was considered positive when it showed at least one unsuspected fracture.

Results

In 313 of 567 infants (55%), 1,029 definite fractures were found. Twenty-one percent (119/567) of the patients had a positive skeletal survey with a total of 789 (77%) unsuspected fractures. Long-bone fractures were the most common injuries, present in 145 children (26%). The skull was the site of fracture in 138 infants (24%); rib cage in 77 (14%), clavicle in 24 (4.2%) and uncommon fractures (including spine, scapula, hands and feet and pelvis) were noted in 26 infants (4.6%). Of the 425 infants with neuroimaging, 154 (36%) had intracranial injury. No significant correlation between positive skeletal survey and associated intracranial injury was found. Scapular fractures and complex skull fractures showed a statistically significant correlation with intracranial injury (P = 0.029, P = 0.007, respectively).

Conclusion

Previously unsuspected fractures are noted on skeletal surveys in 20% of cases of suspected infant abuse. These data may be helpful in the design and optimization of global skeletal imaging in this vulnerable population.

Keywords

Child abuse Skeletal survey Fracture Infant Classic metaphyseal lesion 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Caffey J (1946) Multiple fractures in the long bones of infants suffering from chronic subdural hematoma. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther 56:163–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kempe CH, Silverman FN, Steele BF et al (1962) The battered-child syndrome. JAMA 181:17–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silverman FN (1953) The roentgen manifestations of unrecognized skeletal trauma in infants. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 69:413–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wheeler SM, Williams L, Beauchesne P et al (2013) Shattered lives and broken childhoods: Evidence of physical child abuse in ancient Egypt. International Journal of Paleopathology 3:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maguire S (2010) Which injuries may indicate child abuse? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 95:170–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leventhal JM, Martin KD, Asnes AG (2008) Incidence of fractures attributable to abuse in young hospitalized children: results from analysis of a United States database. Pediatrics 122:599–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merten DF, Radkowski MA, Leonidas JC (1983) The abused child: a radiological reappraisal. Radiology 146:377–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loder RT, Feinberg JR (2007) Orthopaedic injuries in children with nonaccidental trauma: demographics and incidence from the 2000 kids’ inpatient database. J Pediatr Orthop 27:421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ACR-SPR practice guideline for skeletal surveys in children: revised 2011 (resolution 54). J Am Coll Radiol 1–6Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duffy SO, Squires J, Fromkin JB et al (2011) Use of skeletal surveys to evaluate for physical abuse: analysis of 703 consecutive skeletal surveys. Pediatrics 127:e47–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karmazyn B, Lewis ME, Jennings SG et al (2011) The prevalence of uncommon fractures on skeletal surveys performed to evaluate for suspected abuse in 930 children: should practice guidelines change? AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W159–W163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Day F, Clegg S, McPhillips M et al (2006) A retrospective case series of skeletal surveys in children with suspected non-accidental injury. J Clin Forensic Med 13:55–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindberg DM, Berger RP, Reynolds MS et al (2014) Yield of skeletal survey by age in children referred to abuse specialists. J Pediatr. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.068 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barber I, Perez-Rossello JM, Wilson CR et al (2013) Prevalence and relevance of pediatric spinal fractures in suspected child abuse. Pediatr Radiol 43:1507–1515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindberg DM, Harper NS, Laskey AL et al (2013) Prevalence of abusive fractures of the hands, feet, spine, or pelvis on skeletal survey: perhaps “uncommon” is more common than suggested. Pediatr Emerg Care 29:26–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    King J, Diefendorf D, Apthorp J et al (1988) Analysis of 429 fractures in 189 battered children. J Pediatr Orthop 8:585–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akbarnia B, Torg JS, Kirkpatrick J et al (1974) Manifestations of the battered-child syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1159–1166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kogutt MS, Swischuk LE, Fagan CJ (1974) Patterns of injury and significance of uncommon fractures in the battered child syndrome. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 121:143–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loder RT, Bookout C (1991) Fracture patterns in battered children. J Orthop Trauma 5:428–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr, Richmond JM et al (1995) Inflicted skeletal injury: a postmortem radiologic-histopathologic study in 31 infants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:647–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carty H, Pierce A (2002) Non-accidental injury: a retrospective analysis of a large cohort. Eur Radiol 12:2919–2925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beals RK, Tufts E (1983) Fractured femur in infancy: the role of child abuse. J Pediatr Orthop 3:583–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS, Leventhal JM et al (1991) Long-bone fractures in young children: distinguishing accidental injuries from child abuse. Pediatrics 88:471–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stewart G, Meert K, Rosenberg N (1993) Trauma in infants less than three months of age. Pediatr Emerg Care 9:199–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pierce MC, Bertocci G (2008) Injury biomechanics and child abuse. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 10:85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Caffey J (1957) Some traumatic lesions in growing bones other than fractures and dislocations: clinical and radiological features: the Mackenzie Davidson memorial lecture. Br J Radiol 30:225–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kleinman PK, Marks SC, Blackbourne B (1986) The metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: a radiologic-histopathologic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:895–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barrett IR, Kozlowski K (1979) The battered child syndrome. Australas Radiol 23:72–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Galleno H, Oppenheim WL (1982) The battered child syndrome revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res 162:11–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karmazyn B, Duhn RD, Jennings SG et al (2011) Long bone fracture detection in suspected child abuse: contribution of lateral views. Pediatr Radiol 42:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kleinman PK (1998) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 2nd edn. Mosby-Year Book Inc., St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kleinman PK, Perez-Rossello JM, Newton AW et al (2011) Prevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1005–1008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lysack JT, Soboleski D (2003) Classic metaphyseal lesion following external cephalic version and cesarean section. Pediatr Radiol 33:422–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    O’Connell A, Donoghue VB (2007) Can classic metaphyseal lesions follow uncomplicated caesarean section? Pediatr Radiol 37:488–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr (1998) A regional approach to the classic metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: the distal femur. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:43–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr (1996) A regional approach to the classic metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: the proximal tibia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reece RM, Sege R (2000) Childhood head injuries: accidental or inflicted? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154:11–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bechtel K, Stoessel K, Leventhal JM et al (2004) Characteristics that distinguish accidental from abusive injury in hospitalized young children with head trauma. Pediatrics 114:165–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Arbogast KB, Margulies SS, Christian CW (2005) Initial neurologic presentation in young children sustaining inflicted and unintentional fatal head injuries. Pediatrics 116:180–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hobbs CJ (1984) Skull fracture and the diagnosis of abuse. Arch Dis Child 59:246–252PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Piteau SJ, Ward MGK, Barrowman NJ et al (2012) Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: a systematic review. Pediatrics 130:315–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Laskey AL, Stump TE, Hicks RA et al (2013) Yield of skeletal surveys in children ≤ 18 months of age presenting with isolated skull fractures. J Pediatr 162:86–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wood JN, Christian CW, Adams CM et al (2009) Skeletal surveys in infants with isolated skull fractures. Pediatrics 123:e247–e252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Singh R, Squires J, Fromkin JB et al (2012) Assessing the use of follow-up skeletal surveys in children with suspected physical abuse. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:972–976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Harlan S, Nixon G, Campbell K et al (2009) Follow-up skeletal surveys for nonaccidental trauma: can a more limited survey be performed? Pediatr Radiol 39:962–968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kleinman PK, Morris NB, Makris J et al (2013) Yield of radiographic skeletal surveys for detection of hand, foot, and spine fractures in suspected child abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:641–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Robben SGF, Karst WA et al (2014) Abusive head trauma: differentiation between impact and non-impact cases based on neuroimaging findings and skeletal surveys. Eur J Radiol 83:584–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Maguire S, Mann MK, Sibert J et al (2005) Are there patterns of bruising in childhood which are diagnostic or suggestive of abuse? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child 90:182–186PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kemp AM, Maguire SA, Nuttall D et al (2014) Bruising in children who are assessed for suspected physical abuse. Arch Dis Child 99:108–113PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ignasi Barber
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeannette M. Perez-Rossello
    • 2
  • Celeste R. Wilson
    • 3
  • Paul K. Kleinman
    • 2
  1. 1.Pediatric Radiology DepartmentHospital Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Radiology DepartmentBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Division of General PediatricsBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations