Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose reduction and diagnostic accuracy of pediatric abdominal CT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since children are more radio-sensitive than adults, there is a need to minimize radiation exposure during CT exams.

Objective

To evaluate the effects of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose reduction, image quality and diagnostic accuracy in pediatric abdominal CT.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the abdominal CT examinations of 41 children (24 boys and 17 girls; mean age: 10 years) with a low-dose radiation protocol and reconstructed with ASIR (the ASIR group). We also reviewed routine-dose abdominal CT examinations of 41 age- and sex-matched controls reconstructed with filtered-back projection (control group). Image quality was assessed objectively as noise measured in the liver, spleen and aorta, as well as subjectively by three pediatric radiologists for diagnostic acceptability using a four-point scale. Radiation dose and objective image qualities of each group were compared with the paired t-test. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by reviewing follow-up imaging studies and medical records in 2012 and 2013.

Results

There was 46.3% dose reduction of size-specific dose estimates in ASIR group (from 13.4 to 7.2 mGy) compared with the control group. Objective noise was higher in the liver, spleen and aorta of the ASIR group (P < 0.001). However, the subjective image quality was average or superior in 84-100% of studies. Only one image was subjectively rated as unacceptable by one reviewer. There was only one case with interpretational error in the control group and none in the ASIR group.

Conclusion

Use of the ASIR technique resulted in greater than a 45% reduction in radiation dose without impairing subjective image quality or diagnostic accuracy in pediatric abdominal CT, despite increased objective image noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The image gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A et al (2004) Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14:995–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A et al (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC et al (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W et al (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK et al (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45:202–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM et al (2012) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64-channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 22:138–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD et al (2011) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 259:565–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR et al (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J et al (2010) A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1095–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vorona GA, Ceschin RC, Clayton BL et al (2011) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique in children: a feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 41:1174–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SH, Kim MJ, Yoon CS et al (2012) Radiation dose reduction with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique for chest CT in children: an intra-individual comparison. Eur J Radiol 81:e938–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Rizzo E et al (2011) Paediatric cardiac CT examinations: impact of the iterative reconstruction method ASIR on image quality–preliminary findings. Pediatr Radiol 41:1154–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh S, Kalra MK, Shenoy-Bhangle AS et al (2012) Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT. Radiology 263:537–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_204.pdf.

  19. MacKersie AB, Lane MJ, Gerhardt RT et al (2005) Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: unenhanced helical CT compared with three-view acute abdominal series. Radiology 237:114–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mueck FG, Korner M, Scherr MK et al (2012) Upgrade to iterative image reconstruction (IR) in abdominal MDCT imaging: a clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction environment (ASIR). Rofo 184:229–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S et al (2012) Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:347–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deak Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M et al (2013) Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 266:197–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Desai GS, Thabet A, Elias AY et al (2013) Comparative assessment of three image reconstruction techniques for image quality and radiation dose in patients undergoing abdominopelvic multidetector CT examinations. Br J Radiol 86:20120161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS et al (2011) Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W743–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaza RK, Platt JF, Al-Hawary MM et al (2012) CT enterography at 80 kVp with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus at 120 kVp with standard reconstruction: image quality, diagnostic adequacy, and dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1084–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoon MA, Kim SH, Lee JM et al (2012) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:596–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kulkarni NM, Uppot RN, Eisner BH et al (2012) Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go? Radiology 265:158–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brady SL, Yee BS, Kaufman RA (2012) Characterization of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in CT: a pediatric oncology perspective. Med Phys 39:5520–5531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gay F, Pavia Y, Pierrat N et al (2013) Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT. Eur Radiol 24:102–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21:2130–2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stolzmann P, Schlett CL, Maurovich-Horvat P et al (2012) Variability and accuracy of coronary CT angiography including use of iterative reconstruction algorithms for plaque burden assessment as compared with intravascular ultrasound-an ex vivo study. Eur Radiol 22:2067–2075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morsbach F, Desbiolles L, Plass A et al (2013) Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol 48:32–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Suzuki S, Machida H, Tanaka I et al (2012) Measurement of vascular wall attenuation: comparison of CT angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction with standard filtered back-projection algorithm CT in vitro. Eur J Radiol 81:3348–3353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schabel C, Fenchel M, Schmidt B et al (2013) Clinical evaluation and potential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography angiography. Acad Radiol 20:165–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fletcher JG, Krueger WR, Hough DM et al (2013) Pilot study of detection, radiologist confidence and image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction at half-routine dose level. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Seibert JA, Boone JM, Wootton-Gorges SL et al (2014) Dose is not always what it seems: where very misleading values can result from volume CT dose index and dose length product. J Am Coll Radiol 11:233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Children’s Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea

    Sohi Bae, Myung-Joon Kim & Mi-Jung Lee

  2. Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Choon-Sik Yoon

  3. Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Dong Wook Kim & Jung Hwa Hong

Authors
  1. Sohi Bae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Myung-Joon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Choon-Sik Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dong Wook Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jung Hwa Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mi-Jung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi-Jung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bae, S., Kim, MJ., Yoon, CS. et al. Effects of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose reduction and diagnostic accuracy of pediatric abdominal CT. Pediatr Radiol 44, 1541–1547 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3058-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3058-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation