Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging summation scores or apparent diffusion coefficient maps in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The diagnostic and prognostic assessment of newborn infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) comprises, among other tools, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.

Objective

To compare the ability of DWI and ADC maps in newborns with HIE to predict the neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age.

Materials and methods

Thirty-four term newborns with HIE admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Modena University Hospital from 2004 to 2008 were consecutively enrolled in the study. All newborns received EEG, conventional MRI and DWI within the first week of life. DWI was analyzed by means of summation (S) score and regional ADC measurements. Neurodevelopmental outcome was assessed with a standard 1–4 scale and the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales - Revised (GMDS-R).

Results

When the outcome was evaluated with a standard 1–4 scale, the DWI S scores showed very high area under the curve (AUC) (0.89) whereas regional ADC measurements in specific subregions had relatively modest predictive value. The lentiform nucleus was the region with the highest AUC (0.78). When GMDS-R were considered, DWI S scores were good to excellent predictors for some GMDS-R subscales. The predictive value of ADC measurements was both region- and subscale-specific. In particular, ADC measurements in some regions (basal ganglia, white matter or rolandic cortex) were excellent predictors for specific GMDS-R with AUCs up to 0.93.

Conclusions

DWI S scores showed the highest prognostic value for the neurological outcome at 2 years of age. Regional ADC measurements in specific subregions proved to be highly prognostic for specific neurodevelopmental outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pierrat V, Haouari N, Liska A et al (2005) Prevalence, causes, and outcome at 2 years of age of newborn encephalopathy: population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90:F257–F261

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barkovich AJ, Hajnal BL, Vigneron D et al (1998) Prediction of neuromotor outcome in perinatal asphyxia: evaluation of MR scoring systems. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:143–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller SP, Ramaswamy V, Michelson D (2005) Patterns of brain injury in term neonatal encephalopathy. J Pediatr 146:453–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Triulzi F, Parazzini C, Righini A (2006) Patterns of damage in the mature neonatal brain. Pediatr Radiol 36:608–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alderliesten T, de Vries LS, Benders MJ et al (2011) MR imaging and outcome of term neonates with perinatal asphyxia: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiology 261:235–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barkovich AJ, Miller SP, Bartha A et al (2006) MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging of sequential studies in neonates with encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:533–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mader I, Schöning M, Klose U et al (2002) Neonatal cerebral infarction diagnosed by diffusion-weighted MRI: pseudonormalization occurs early. Stroke 33:1142–1145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ment LR, Bada HS, Barnes P et al (2002) Practice parameter: neuroimaging of the neonate: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 58:1726–1738

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rutherford M, Counsell S, Allsop J et al (2004) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in term perinatal brain injury: a comparison with site of lesion and time from birth. Pediatrics 114:1004–1014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rutherford M, Malamateniou C, McGuinness A et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging in hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev 86:351–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McKinstry RC, Miller JH, Snyder AZ et al (2002) A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns. Neurology 59:824–833

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barkovich AJ, Westmark KD, Bedi HS et al (2001) Proton spectroscopy and diffusion imaging on the first day of life after perinatal asphyxia: preliminary report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1786–1794

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Twomey E, Twomey A, Ryan S et al (2010) MR imaging of term infants with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy as a predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome and late MRI appearances. Pediatr Radiol 40:1526–1535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Taylor A et al (2010) Cerebral magnetic resonance biomarkers in neonatal encephalopathy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 125:e382–e395

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffiths R (1970) The abilities of young children. Child Development Research Centre, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liauw L, van Wezel-Meijler G, Veen S et al (2009) Do apparent diffusion coefficient measurements predict outcome in children with neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:264–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oishi K, Mori S, Donohue PK et al (2011) Multi-contrast human neonatal brain atlas: application to normal neonate development analysis. Neuroimage 56:8–20

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Amiel-Tison C, Grenier A (1986) Neurological assessment during the first year of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Towen BCL (1976) Neurological development in infancy. Mac Keith Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ferrari F, Gallo C, Pugliese M et al (2012) Preterm birth and developmental problems in the preschool age. Part I: minor motor problems. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:2154–2159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS (1976) Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol 33:696–705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arrigoni F, Parazzini C, Righini A et al (2011) Deep medullary vein involvement in neonates with brain damage: an MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:2030–2036

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rutherford MA, Pennock JM, Counsell SJ et al (1998) Abnormal magnetic resonance signal in the internal capsule predicts poor neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics 102:323–328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez-Biarge M, Diez-Sebastian J, Kapellou O et al (2011) Predicting motor outcome and death in term hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Neurology 76:2055–2061

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barnett A, Mercuri E, Rutherford M et al (2002) Neurological and perceptual-motor outcome at 5–6 years of age in children with neonatal encephalopathy: relationship with neonatal brain MRI. Neuropediatrics 33:242–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. de Vries LS, Jongmans MJ (2010) Long-term outcome after neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 95:F220–F224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Cavalleri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cavalleri, F., Lugli, L., Pugliese, M. et al. Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging summation scores or apparent diffusion coefficient maps in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatr Radiol 44, 1141–1154 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2945-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2945-9

Keywords

Navigation