Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To eliminate the medical risks and logistical challenges of transporting infants from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the radiology department for magnetic resonance imaging, a small-footprint 1.5-T MRI scanner has been developed for neonatal imaging within the NICU. MRI is known to be noisy, and exposure to excessive acoustic noise has the potential to elicit physiological distress and impact development in the term and preterm infant.

Objective

To measure and compare the acoustic noise properties of the NICU MRI system against those of a conventional 1.5-T MRI system.

Materials and methods

We performed sound pressure level measurements in the NICU MRI scanner and in a conventional adult-size whole-body 1.5-T MRI system. Sound pressure level measurements were made for six standard clinical MR imaging protocols.

Results

The average sound pressure level value, reported in unweighted (dB) and A-weighted (dBA) decibels for all six imaging pulse sequences, was 73.8 dB and 88 dBA for the NICU scanner, and 87 dB and 98.4 dBA for the conventional MRI scanner. The sound pressure level values measured on the NICU scanner for each of the six MR imaging pulse sequences were consistently and significantly (P = 0.03) lower, with an average difference of 14.2 dB (range 10–21 dB) and 11 dBA (range 5–18 dBA). The sound pressure level frequency response of the two MR systems showed a similar harmonic structure above 200 Hz for all imaging sequences. The amplitude, however, was appreciably lower for the NICU scanner, by as much as 30 dB, for frequencies below 200 Hz.

Conclusion

The NICU MRI system is quieter than conventional MRI scanners, improving safety for the neonate and facilitating siting of the unit within the NICU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Franks JR, Stephenson MR, Merry CJ (1996) Preventing occupational hearing loss—a practical guide. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-110/pdfs/96-110.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2014

  2. Morris BH, Philbin MK, Bose C (2000) Physiological effects of sound on the newborn. J Perinatol 20:S55–S60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Watts C, Trim E, Metherall J et al (2008) Neonatal transport—the comfort zone. Neonatal Transp 4:4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2011) OSHA fact sheet: laboratory safety noise. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/laboratory/OSHAfactsheet-laboratory-safety-noise.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2014

  5. Nordell A, Lundh M, Horsch S et al (2009) The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Paediatr 98:1278–1283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amaro E Jr, Williams SC, Shergill SS et al (2002) Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:497–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Philbin MK, Taber KH, Hayman LA (1996) Preliminary report: changes in vital signs of term newborns during MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1033–1036

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lasky RE, Williams AL (2005) The development of the auditory system from conception to term. NeoReviews 6:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Auditory development in the fetus and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Sensory development in the fetus, neonate and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:169–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Sleep and brain development, neonate and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Macnab A, Chen Y, Gagnon F et al (1995) Vibration and noise in pediatric emergency transport vehicles: a potential cause of morbidity? Aviat Space Environ Med 66:212–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. White RD (2012) Report of the eighth census conference on newborn ICU design. Standard 27—acoustic environment. http://www3.nd.edu/~nicudes/stan%2027.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2014

  14. Berger EH (1984) Attenuation of earplugs worn in combination with earmuffs. Occup Health Saf May:72–73

  15. Witt B (2007) Dual protection. Bacou-Dalloz Hearing Safety Group. Sound Source. http://www.howardleight.com/images/pdf/0000/0270/Sound_Source_11a_Dual_Protection.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2014

  16. Small SA, Stapells DR (2006) Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing. Ear Hear 27:219–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tkach JA, Hillman NH, Jobe AH et al (2012) An MRI system for imaging neonates in the NICU: initial feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 42:1347–1356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tkach JA, Merhar SL, Kline-Fath BM et al (2014) MR imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit: initial experience using a small footprint 1.5 T system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W95–W105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Windram J, Grosse-Wortmann L, Shariat M (2012) Cardiovascular MRI without sedation or general anesthesia using a feed-and-sleep technique in neonates and infants. Pediatr Radiol 42:183–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mathur AM, Neil JJ, McKinstry RC et al (2008) Transport, monitoring, and successful brain MR imaging in unsedated neonates. Pediatr Radiol 38:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hurwitz R, Lane SR, Bell RA et al (1989) Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging. Radiology 173:545–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McJury MJ (1995) Acoustic noise levels generated during high field MR imaging. Clin Radiol 50:331–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Price DL, De Wilde JP, Papadaki AM et al (2001) Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:288–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor (2013) Noise and hearing conservation. Appendix I:A-4. A-weighted network. https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/noise/health_effects/soundpressure_aweighted.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2013

  25. Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM (2000) Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol 20:S21–S30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boothroyd A (1986) Speech acoustics and speech perception. (Pro-ed studies in communication disorders), PRO-ED, Austin, TX

  27. Boothroyd A (2004) Room acoustics and speech perception. Semin Hear 25:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berglund B, Hassmen P, Job RF (1996) Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. J Acoust Soc Am 99:2985–3002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y et al (2003) Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci 23:876–882

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Beauve B, Dearlove O (2008) Sedation of children under 4 weeks of age for MRI examination. Paediatr Anaesth 18:892–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Allegaert K, Naulaers G (2008) Procedural sedation of neonates with chloral hydrate: a sedation procedure does not end at the end of the acquisition of the images. Paediatr Anaesth 18:1270–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Koch BL (2008) Avoiding sedation in pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol 38:S225–S226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cote CJ (2010) Safety after chloral hydrate sedation of former preterm and term infants for magnetic resonance imaging: are the data clear? Anesth Analg 110:671–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Etzel-Hardman D, Kapsin K, Jones S et al (2009) Sedation reduction in a pediatric radiology department. J Healthc Qual 31:34–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way, MLC 5033, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA

    Jean A. Tkach, Yu Li, Ronald G. Pratt, Wolfgang Loew, Barret R. Daniels, Randy O. Giaquinto & Charles L. Dumoulin

  2. Division of Audiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Kelly A. Baroch

  3. Division of Neonatology and Pulmonary Biology, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Stephanie L. Merhar

  4. Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Beth M. Kline-Fath

Authors
  1. Jean A. Tkach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ronald G. Pratt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kelly A. Baroch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wolfgang Loew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Barret R. Daniels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Randy O. Giaquinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Stephanie L. Merhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Beth M. Kline-Fath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Charles L. Dumoulin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean A. Tkach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tkach, J.A., Li, Y., Pratt, R.G. et al. Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system. Pediatr Radiol 44, 1011–1019 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2909-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2909-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation