Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trends in CT scan rates in children and pregnant women: teaching, private, public and nonprofit facilities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Radiation exposure from medical sources now equals or exceeds that from natural background sources, largely attributable to a 20-fold increase in CT use since 1980. Increasing exposure to children and fetuses is of most concern due to their heightened susceptibility. More recently, CT use may be leveling or decreasing, but it is unclear whether this change is widespread or varies by type of institution.

Objective

We sought to characterize trends in CT utilization in California hospitals and emergency departments among children and pregnant women, looking at different types of facilities, such as teaching, private, public and nonprofit institutions.

Materials and methods

We examined frequency of CT examinations by year from 229 facilities reporting CT usage in routinely collected California statewide data for 2005–2012. We modeled trends overall and by facility type.

Results

CT scans for pediatric and pregnant patient visits in the emergency department increased initially, then started to decline after 2008. Among hospital admissions, rates declined or leveled after 2005. In the emergency department, CT rates varied between types of facilities, with teaching hospitals reducing use sooner and more sharply than other types of facilities.

Conclusion

CT utilization in California among children and pregnant women has begun to level or decline. Still, population exposure remains at historically high levels, warranting consideration of potential public health implications. Further examination of reasons for trends among hospital types, particularly how teaching hospitals have reduced rates of CT utilization, may help identify strategies for CT reduction without compromising patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 160. Bethesda, MD

  2. Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources–1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 10:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 12, Part I, cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences (2006) Biological effects of ionizing radiation VII, health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Menoch MJ, Hirsh DA, Khan NS et al (2012) Trends in computed tomography utilization in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 129:e690–e697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roudsari BS, Psoter KJ, Vavilala MS et al (2013) CT use in hospitalized pediatric trauma patients: 15-year trends in a level I pediatric and adult trauma center. Radiology 267:479–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1194–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas KE (2011) CT utilization–trends and developments beyond the United States’ borders. Pediatr Radiol Suppl 2:562–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (2005–2011) California Health and Human Services Agency. Emergency Department and Patient Discharge Data. Sacramento, CA

  14. American Medical Association (2010) Current procedural terminology: CPT, Standard edn. American Medical Association, Chicago

  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Classification of diseases, functioning, and disability: International classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm. Page last reviewed: 18 June 2013. Accessed 1 July 2013

  16. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2011) Clinical classifications software (CCS) for ICD-9-CM. Rockville, MD. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Accessed 4 October 2011

  17. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2011) Clinical classifications software for services and procedures. Rockville, MD. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs_svcsproc/ccssvcproc.jsp. Accessed 4 October 2011

  18. Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (2010) California emergency department and ambulatory surgery data reporting manual, medical information reporting for California, 4th edn. http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/hid/MIRCal/Text_pdfs/ManualsGuides/EDASManual/PrincipalProcedure.pdf

  19. Office of Statewide Planning and Development (2005–2011) Patient discharge data, file documentation

  20. Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research, volume II: the design and analysis of cohort studies, IARC Scientific Publication No. 82. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  21. Littell R, Milliken GA, Stroup W et al (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Press, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  22. SAS Institute Inc (2011) SAS/STAT® 9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC

  23. Cleveland WS (1985) Elements of graphing data. Hobart Press, Summit

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mannix R, Meehan WP, Monuteaux MC et al (2012) Computed tomography for minor head injury: variation and trends in major United States pediatric emergency departments. J Pediatr 160:136–9.e1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995–2007. Radiology 258:164–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lazarus E, DeBenedectis C, North D et al (2009) Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients—1997–2006. Radiology 251:517–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldberg-Stein S, Liu B, Hahn PF et al (2011) Body CT during pregnancy: utilization trends, examination indications, and fetal radiation doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:146–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. American College of Radiology and Radiologic Society of North America (2013) RadiologyInfo.org, The radiology source for patients. http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=bodyct. Page last reviewed on 1 May 2013. Accessed 25 June 2013

  29. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2013) Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Number 299, September 2004, (Reaffirmed 2009). Available via http://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Obstetric_Practice/Guidelines_for_Diagnostic_Imaging_During_Pregnancy. Accessed 07 Oct 2013

  30. University of California, San Francisco (2013) Carcinogenesis after exposure to ionizing radiation. http://www.radiology.ucsf.edu/patient-care/patient-safety/ct-mri-pregnancy/carcinogenesis. Accessed 1 June 2013

  31. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) AAPM position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging procedures. Policy date: 12/13/2011; sunset date: 12/31/2016. http://www.aapm.org/org/policies/details.asp?id=318&type=PP&current=true. Accessed 25 June 2013

  32. Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W et al (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120:677–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z (2013) Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dorfman AL, Fazel R, Einstein AJ et al (2010) Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 165:458–464

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weigner MB, Dewar KM, Basham HF et al (2012) Impact of education on physician attitudes toward computed tomography utilization and consent. J Emerg Med 43:e349–e353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Image Gently, The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging (2013) http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/. Accessed 3 June 2013

  39. Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schroeder AR, Redberg RF (2013) The harm in looking. JAMA Pediatr 10:1–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McCollough CH, Chen GH, Kalender W et al (2012) Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. Radiology 264:567–580

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bloomberg.com (2012) SIIM12: Nuance and radimetrics address radiation dose management and reporting: technology integration supports new California law to include radiation dose data in patients’ radiology reports, offers national solution to manage radiation overexposure. June 7, 2012. http://www.bloomberg.com/article/2012-06-07/aEdeH83v8dTY.html. Accessed 1 June 2013

  43. California Senate Bill, No. 1237 (2010) Radiation control: health facilities and clinics: records. February 19, 2010. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1237_bill_20100623_amended_asm_v97.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge and thank Rebecca Jackson, MPH; Danny Kwon, MPH, and Rathana Yim for their assistance with data analysis.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Health Investigations Branch, California Department of Public Health, 850 Marina Bay Parkway, Building P, 3rd Floor, Richmond, CA, 94804, USA

    Sumi Hoshiko, Daniel Smith, Cathyn Fan, Carrie R. Jones & Sandra V. McNeel

  2. Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital and Research Center Oakland, Oakland, CA, USA

    Ronald A. Cohen

Authors
  1. Sumi Hoshiko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cathyn Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carrie R. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sandra V. McNeel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ronald A. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumi Hoshiko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoshiko, S., Smith, D., Fan, C. et al. Trends in CT scan rates in children and pregnant women: teaching, private, public and nonprofit facilities. Pediatr Radiol 44, 522–528 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2881-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2881-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation