Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 9, pp 1213–1217 | Cite as

Fetal MRI on a multi-element digital coil platform

  • Suraj D. SeraiEmail author
  • Arnold C. Merrow
  • Beth M. Kline-Fath
Technical Innovation

Abstract

Fetal MRI has an increasing list of indications and is most commonly employed when anomalies detected by prenatal ultrasonography require further characterization. This may occur when sonography is technically challenging or where specific MRI findings will determine pre- and postnatal management, including critical in utero and/or peripartum interventions. In these circumstances, there are high expectations for MRI to sort out complex diagnostic dilemmas through exquisite anatomical imaging that fetal surgeons and obstetricians can comprehend and relay to their patients. These expectations, in light of evolving clinical innovations, continue to drive advances in fetal imaging. Increasing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is fundamental to improving MR image quality, and proper coil selection is a key component of this pursuit. Since the introduction of parallel imaging techniques, the numbers of elements in phased-array coils have been continuously increased to achieve high SNR and shorter scan times. With the invention of a digital coil platform, it is now possible to connect combinations of multiple coil elements to enhance SNR beyond the capabilities of the adult eight-channel torso-coil routinely used in fetal imaging. This paper describes the application of multi-element radiofrequency coils on a digital broadband imaging platform with unique coil combinations to perform dedicated fetal MRI.

Keywords

Fetal MRI Digital coils MRI in pregnancy Abdomen MRI 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Lowe TW, Weinreb J, Santos-Ramos R et al (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging in human pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 66:629–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mailath-Pokorny M, Kasprian G, Mitter C et al (2012) Magnetic resonance methods in fetal neurology. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 17:278–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levine D (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal diagnosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 13:572–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M et al (2009) Assessment of congenital heart disease (CHD): is there a role for fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? Eur J Radiol 72:172–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pugash D, Brugger PC, Bettelheim D et al (2008) Prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI: the comparative value of each modality in prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 68:214–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prayer D, Brugger PC, Prayer L (2004) Fetal MRI: techniques and protocols. Pediatr Radiol 34:685–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hubbard AM, Harty P (1999) Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging of fetal anomalies. Semin Roentgenol 34:41–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mansfield P, Stehling MK, Ordidge RJ et al (1990) Echo planar imaging of the human fetus in utero at 0.5 T. Br J Radiol 63:833–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suraj D. Serai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arnold C. Merrow
    • 1
  • Beth M. Kline-Fath
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations