Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT-guided musculoskeletal procedures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Computed-tomography-guided interventions are attractive for tissue sampling of pediatric bone lesions; however, it comes with exposure to ionizing radiation, inherent to CT and magnified by multiple passes during needle localization.

Objective

We evaluate a method of CT-guided bone biopsy that minimizes ionizing radiation exposure by lowering CT scanner tube current (mAs) and voltage (kVp) during each localization scan.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all CT-guided bone biopsies (n = 13) over a 1-year period in 12 children. Three blinded readers identified the needle tip on the reduced-dose CT images (mAs = 50, kVp = 80) during the final localization scan at biopsy and rated the image quality as high, moderate or low.

Results

The image quality of the reduced-dose scans during biopsy was rated as either high or moderate, with needle tip visualized in 12 out of 13 biopsies. Twelve of 13 biopsies also returned sufficient sample for a pathological diagnosis. The average savings in exposure using the dose-reduction technique was 87%.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that a low mAs and kVp strategy for needle localization during CT-guided bone biopsy yields a large dose reduction and produces acceptable image quality without sacrificing yield for biopsy diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gogna A, Peh WC, Munk PL (2008) Image-guided musculoskeletal biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 46:455–473

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huang AJ, Kattapuram SV (2011) Musculoskeletal neoplasms: biopsy and intervention. Radiol Clin North Am 49:1287–1305

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ward WG Sr, Kilpatrick S (2000) Fine needle aspiration biopsy of primary bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res (373):80–87

  4. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38:265–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sidhu M, Coley BD, Goske MJ et al (2009) Image Gently, Step Lightly: increasing radiation dose awareness in pediatric interventional radiology. Pediatr Radiol 39:1135–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hryhorczuk AL, Strouse PJ, Biermann JS (2011) Accuracy of CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy for assessment of pediatric musculoskeletal lesions. Pediatr Radiol 41:848–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS et al (2001) CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology 220:161–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A, Strombeck A et al (2010) Radiological and clinical outcome of screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation with low-dose computed tomography. Eur Spine J 19:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dupuy DE, Rosenberg AE, Punyaratabandhu T et al (1998) Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:759–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fayad LM, Johnson P, Fishman EK (2005) Multidetector CT of musculoskeletal disease in the pediatric patient: principles, techniques, and clinical applications. Radiographics 25:603–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Salamipour H, Jimenez RM, Brec SL et al (2005) Multidetector row CT in pediatric musculoskeletal imaging. Pediatr Radiol 35:555–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shin HJ, Amaral JG, Armstrong D et al (2007) Image-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions in children. Pediatr Radiol 37:362–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JC, Jin DH, Watkins GE et al (2011) Ultra-low-dose protocol for CT-guided lung biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:431–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heyer CM, Lemburg SP, Kagel T et al (2005) Evaluation of chronic infectious interstitial pulmonary disease in children by low-dose CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy. Eur Radiol 15:1289–1295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heyer CM, Nusslein TG, Stephan V et al (2007) Low-dose CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy for evaluation of non-infectious chronic interstitial lung disease in children. Pneumologie 61:499–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenthal DI (2006) Radiofrequency treatment. Orthop Clin North Am 37:475–484

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leng S, Christner JA, Carlson SK et al (2011) Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W97–W103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. MacKenzie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, A.S., Soares, B., Courtier, J. et al. Radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT-guided musculoskeletal procedures. Pediatr Radiol 43, 1303–1308 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2691-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2691-4

Keywords

Navigation