Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic errors with inserted tubes, lines and catheters in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tubes and catheters are frequently used in the care of hospitalized children. Yet little is known about errors in diagnosis in commonly implanted devices in a pediatric population.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and range of diagnostic errors with inserted devices in a pediatric population.

Materials and methods

During a 9-year period 142,041 cases were reviewed as part of our ongoing quality-assurance process. Of 4,084 disagreements in diagnosis encountered, 50 cases with diagnostic errors related to endovascular catheters, gastrointestinal, genitourinary and neurosurgical tubes, and pacemaker wires were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Diagnostic error was defined as a diagnosis that was unintentionally delayed, wrong or missed. These errors were classified as perceptual, cognitive, system-related or unavoidable and were graded according to potential clinical impact using a scale from 1 to 4, with 4 being the most serious.

Results

Device-related diagnostic errors accounted for 1.2% of all discrepancies identified and 10% of errors potentially leading to a change in therapy. Seventeen of the 50 diagnostic errors were related to vascular catheters (34%), including wrong anatomical location of catheter tip (12) and missed catheter fracture or migration (5). Twenty-seven errors (54%) were related to non-vascular catheters and involved enteric tube location (15), ventricular drainage catheters (7), endotracheal tubes (3) and genitourinary catheters (2). Six additional errors involved a vascular stent, endovascular cuff, needle, chest tube and epicardial wire placement (2).

Conclusion

Device-related diagnostic errors are not frequent in complex pediatric patients. However, they can have a clinically significant impact on patient outcomes and management. High-risk situations include altered patient anatomy, poor or limited image quality, inconspicuous lines and incomplete review of prior studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teele SA, Emani SM, Thiagarajan RR et al (2008) Catheters, wires, tubes and drains on postoperative radiographs of pediatric cardiac patients: the whys and wherefores. Pediatr Radiol 38:1041–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS, Tsau PH et al (2004) Medical devices of the chest. Radiographics 24:1725–1746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor GA, Voss SD, Melvin PR et al (2011) Diagnostic errors in pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol 41:327–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R (2005) Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med 165:1493–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. VA National Center for Patient Safety. The basics of failure mode and effect analysis. Available at www.patientsafety.gov/SafetyTopics.html. Accessed 6 July 2006

  6. Bagian JP, Gosbee J, Lee CZ et al (2002) The veterans affairs root cause analysis system in action. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 28:531–545

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benavidez OJ, Gauvreau K, Jenkins KJ et al (2008) Diagnostic errors in pediatric echocardiography: development of taxonomy and identification of risk factors. Circulation 117:2995–3001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kassirer JP, Kopelman RI (1989) Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences. Am J Med 86:433–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bordage G (1999) Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations and educational implications. Acad Med 74:S138–S143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McGee DC, Gould MK (2003) Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 348:1123–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitzgerald R (2001) Error in radiology. Clin Radiol 56:938–946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brenner RJ, Lucey LL, Smith JJ et al (1998) Radiology and medical malpractice claims: a report of the practice standards claims survey of the Physician Insurers Association of America and the American College of Radiology. AJR 171:19–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Renfrew DL, Franken EA, Berbaum KS et al (1992) Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology 183:145–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berbaum KS, Franken EA Jr, Dorfman DD et al (1992) Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol 27:571–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Samuel S, Kundel HL, Nodine CF et al (1995) Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs. Radiology 194:895–902

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Dorfman DD et al (2000) Role of faulty decision making in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. Acad Radiol 7:1098–1106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Espinosa JA, Nolan TW (2000) Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study. Br Med J 320:737–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to express their thanks to Mrs. Jane Choura for expert manuscript editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Isabel Fuentealba & George A. Taylor

  2. Department of Radiology, Clínica Alemana, Hospital Luis Calvo MacKenna, Santiago, Chile

    Isabel Fuentealba

Authors
  1. Isabel Fuentealba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George A. Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George A. Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuentealba, I., Taylor, G.A. Diagnostic errors with inserted tubes, lines and catheters in children. Pediatr Radiol 42, 1305–1315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2462-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2462-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation