Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is an important procedure in the diagnosis and follow-up of paediatric liver disease. Its purpose is to obtain tissue for histopathological observation, in our case, with ultrasound (US) guidance.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of US-guided PLB in children.

Material and methods

A retrospective study over a period of 12 years, from January 1999 until December 2010, with a selection of US-guided PLB performed in children with focal liver lesions or diffuse hepatic disease and liver transplant (LT). A 16-gauge automatic needle was used and a maximum of three fragments of liver were collected. Contraindications were: bile duct dilatation (>3 mm) INR > 1.5 (reference range, 0.9 -- 1.2) and platelet count <50,000 (reference range, 150,000 -- 450,000). Analysis focused on complications and final diagnosis.

Results

A total of 513 biopsies were performed, 379 (73.9%) in children who had undergone orthotopic LT, 117 (22.8%) in children with liver disease of unknown cause and 17 (3.3%) in children with focal hepatic lesions. Histological diagnosis was obtained in 509 of 513 (99.3%) biopsies performed. Minor complications were registered in 38 patients (7.4%) and major complications occurred in 5 patients (1%). None needed a surgical intervention.

Conclusion

US-guided PLB in children is a safe and efficient method to achieve a specific diagnosis in liver disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen MB, A-Kader HH, Lambers D et al (1992) Complications of percutaneous liver biopsy in children. Gastroenterology 102:629–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Younossi ZM, Teran JC, Ganiats TG et al (1998) Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease—an economical analysis. Dig Dis Sci 43:46–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasha T, Gabriel S, Therneau T et al (1998) Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Hepatology 27:1220–1226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nobili V, Comparcola D, Sartorelli MR et al (2003) Blind and ultrasound-guideed percutaneous liver biopsy in children. Pediatr Radiol 33:772–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amaral JG, Schwartz J, Chait P et al (2006) Sonographically guided percutanoues liver biopsy in infants: a retrospective review. AJR 187:W644–W649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardella JF, Bakal CW, Bertino RE et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for image-guided percutaneous biopsy in adults. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S227–S230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Manalakopoulos S, Triantos C, Bethanis S et al (2007) Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in real life: comparison same-day prebiopsy versus realt-rime ultrasound approach. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:1490–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopper K, Grenko R, TenHave T et al (1995) Percutaneous biopsy of the liver and kidney by using coaxial technique: adequacy of the specimen obtained with three different needles in vitro. AJR 164:221–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheimann AO, Barrios JM, Al-Tawil YS et al (2000) Percutaneous liver biopsy in children: impact of ultraonography and spring-loaded biopsy needles. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 31:536–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alotaibi M, Shrouder-Henry J, Amaral J et al (2011) The positive color Doppler sign post biopsy: effectiveness of US-directed compression in achieving hemostasis. Pediatr Radiol 41:362–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pietrobattista A, Fruwirth R, Natali G et al (2009) Is juvenile liver biopsy unsafe? Putting an end to a common misapprehension. Pediatr Radiol 39:959–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fahey BJ, Nightingale KR, Nelson RC et al (2005) Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the abdomen: demonstration of feasibility and utility. Ultrasound Med Biol 31:1185–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lupsor M, Badea R, Stefanescu H et al (2009) Performance of a new elastographic method (ARFI technology) compared to unidimensional transient elastography in the noninvasive assessment of chronic hepatitis C. Preliminary results. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 18:303–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S et al (2009) Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology 252:595–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Matos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matos, H., Noruegas, M.J., Gonçalves, I. et al. Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children. Pediatr Radiol 42, 1322–1325 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2433-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2433-z

Keywords

Navigation