Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of preparation and support procedures for children with sickle cell disease undergoing MRI

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) often undergo MRI studies to assess brain injury or to quantify hepatic iron. MRI requires the child to lie motionless for 30–60 min, thus sedation/anesthesia might be used to facilitate successful completion of exams, but this poses additional risks for SCD patients. To improve children’s ability to cope with MRI examinations and avoid sedation, our institution established preparation and support procedures (PSP).

Objective

To investigate the impact of PSP in reducing the need for sedation during MRI exams among children with SCD.

Materials and methods

Data on successful completion of MRI testing were compared among 5- to 12-year-olds who underwent brain MRI or liver R2*MRI with or without receiving PSP.

Results

Seventy-one children with SCD (median age 9.85 years, range 5.57–12.99 years) underwent a brain MRI (n = 60) or liver R2*MRI (n = 11). Children who received PSP were more likely to complete an interpretable MRI exam than those who did not (30 of 33; 91% vs. 27 of 38; 71%, unadjusted OR = 4.1 (P = 0.04) and OR = 8.5 (P < 0.01) when adjusting for age.

Conclusion

PSP can help young children with SCD complete clinically interpretable, nonsedated MRI exams, avoiding the risks of sedation/anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohene-Frempong K, Weiner SJ, Sleeper LA et al (1998) Cerebrovascular accidents in sickle cell disease: rates and risk factors. Blood 91:288–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pegelow CH, Wang W, Granger S et al (2001) Silent infarcts in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal cerebral artery velocity. Arch Neurol 58:2017–2021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Powars D, Wilson B, Imbus C et al (1978) The natural history of stroke in sickle cell disease. Am J Med 65:461–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Balkaran B, Char G, Morris JS et al (1992) Stroke in a cohort of patients with homozygous sickle cell disease. J Pediatr 120:360–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams RJ, McKie VC, Hsu L et al (1998) Prevention of a first stroke by transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal results on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 339:5–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Adams RJ, McKie VC, Brambilla D et al (1998) Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia. Control Clin Trials 19:110–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kugler S, Anderson B, Cross D et al (1993) Abnormal cranial magnetic resonance imaging scans in sickle-cell disease. Neurological correlates and clinical implications. Arch Neurol 50:629–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olivieri NF (2001) Progression of iron overload in sickle cell disease. Semin Hematol 38:57–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jordan LC, McKinstry RC III, Kraut MA et al (2010) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging of children with sickle cell disease. Pediatrics 126:53–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hulbert ML, McKinstry RC, Lacey JL et al (2011) Silent cerebral infarcts occur despite regular blood transfusion therapy after first strokes in children with sickle cell disease. Blood 117:772–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hankins JS, McCarville MB, Loeffler RB et al (2009) R2* magnetic resonance imaging of the liver in patients with iron overload. Blood 113:4853–4855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. St Pierre TG, Clark PR, Chua-Anusorn W et al (2005) Noninvasive measurement and imaging of liver iron concentrations using proton magnetic resonance. Blood 105:855–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koshy M, Weiner SJ, Miller ST et al (1995) Surgery and anesthesia in sickle cell disease. Cooperative study of sickle cell diseases. Blood 86:3676–3684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Holzmann L, Finn H, Lichtman HC et al (1969) Anesthesia in patients with sickle cell disease: a review of 112 cases. Anesth Analg 48:566–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oduro KA, Searle JF (1972) Anaesthesia in sickle-cell states: a plea for simplicity. Br Med J 4:596–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Child Life Council Inc. (2011) Child life: empowering children and families. http://www.childlife.org. Accessed 27 April 2012

  17. Vichinsky EP, Haberkern CM, Neumayr L et al (1995) A comparison of conservative and aggressive transfusion regimens in the perioperative management of sickle cell disease. The Preoperative Transfusion in Sickle Cell Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med 333:206–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vichinsky EP, Neumayr LD, Haberkern C et al (1999) The perioperative complication rate of orthopedic surgery in sickle cell disease: report of the National Sickle Cell Surgery Study Group. Am J Hematol 62:129–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Josephson CD, Su LL, Hillyer KL et al (2007) Transfusion in the patient with sickle cell disease: a critical review of the literature and transfusion guidelines. Transfus Med Rev 21:118–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buck J, Davies SC (2005) Surgery in sickle cell disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 19:897–902, vii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ (2011) Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 41:1353–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raschle NM, Lee M, Buechler R et al (2009) Making MR imaging child's play—pediatric neuroimaging protocol, guidelines and procedure. J Vis Exp 29:pii1309

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carter AJ, Greer ML, Gray SE et al (2010) Mock MRI: reducing the need for anaesthesia in children. Pediatr Radiol 40:1368–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carbajal R, Lenclen R, Gajdos V et al (2002) Crossover trial of analgesic efficacy of glucose and pacifier in very preterm neonates during subcutaneous injections. Pediatrics 110:389–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shields CH, Johnson S, Knoll J et al (2004) Sleep deprivation for pediatric sedated procedures: not worth the effort. Pediatrics 113:1204–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kazak AE, Penati B, Brophy P et al (1998) Pharmacologic and psychologic interventions for procedural pain. Pediatrics 102:59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hallowell LM, Stewart SE, de Amorim E et al (2008) Reviewing the process of preparing children for MRI. Pediatr Radiol 38:271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Khan JJ, Donnelly LF, Koch BL (2007) A program to decrease the need for pediatric sedation for CT and MRI. Appl Radiol 4:30–33

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pressdee D, May L, Eastman E et al (1997) The use of play therapy in the preparation of children undergoing MR imaging. Clin Radiol 52:945–947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Smart G (1997) Helping children relax during magnetic resonance imaging. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 22:236–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Shawna Grissom, MS, CCLS, CEIM, for supporting the implementation of the PSP program; Banu Aygun, MD, Amy Kimble, FNP, and Nicole Mortier, PA-C, MHS, for excellence in patient care and support with patient referral to PSP; and Winfred Wang, MD, and Vani Shanker, PhD, for editing the manuscript.

Disclaimer

The study was supported in part by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine R. Cejda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cejda, K.R., Smeltzer, M.P., Hansbury, E.N. et al. The impact of preparation and support procedures for children with sickle cell disease undergoing MRI. Pediatr Radiol 42, 1223–1228 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2422-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2422-2

Keywords

Navigation