Skip to main content
Log in

Sonographic assessment of the retroperitoneal position of the third portion of the duodenum: an indicator of normal intestinal rotation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of intestinal malrotation is based on an upper gastrointestinal contrast series (UGI), which is considered the imaging reference standard. It may however be challenging even for experienced paediatric radiologists.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the agreement between UGI and US in assessing the position of the third portion of the duodenum (D3) and to show that a retroperitoneal duodenum indicates normal forgut rotation.

Materials and methods

In a prospective study, US assessment of the duodenum and the superior mesenteric vessels was performed in consecutive children who were referred for clinically indicated UGI at a single institution.

Results

Eighty-five children, 5 months to 14 years old, were studied. In 82/85 (96%), both US and UGI suggested normal forgut rotation. In three children, US demonstrated a normal position of the D3 whereas UGI showed an abnormal position of the duodeno-jejunal junction.

Conclusion

US is a non-invasive, easily performed technique for excluding malrotation. UGI may be reserved for situations where US does not demonstrate a normal position of the D3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yousefzadeh DK, Soper RT, Jackson JH Jr (1980) Diagnostic advantages of manual compression fluoroscopy in the radiologic work-up of vomiting neonates. J Pediatr Surg 15:270–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz ME, Siegel MJ, Shackelford GD et al (1987) The position and mobility of the duodenum in children. AJR 148:947–951

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loyer E, Eggli KD (1989) Sonographic evaluation of superior mesenteric vascular relationship in malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 19:173–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dufour D, Delaet MH, Dassonville M et al (1992) Midgut malrotation, the reliability of sonographic diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 22:21–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Millar AJ, Rode H, Brown RA et al (1987) The deadly vomit: malrotation and midgut volvulus. A review of 137 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 2:172–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rescorla FJ, Shedd FJ, Grosfeld JL et al (1990) Anomalies of intestinal rotation in childhood: analysis of 447 cases. Surgery 108:710–715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Long FR, Kramer SS, Markowitz RI et al (1996) Intestinal malrotation in children: tutorial on radiographic diagnosis in difficult cases. Radiology 198:775–780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dilley AV, Pereira J, Shi EC et al (2000) The radiologist says malrotation: does the surgeon operate? Pediatr Surg Int 16:45–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashley LM, Allen S, Teele RL (2001) A normal sonogram does not exclude malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 31:354–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Strouse PJ (2004) Disorders of intestinal rotation and fixation ("malrotation"). Pediatr Radiol 34:837–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Applegate KE, Anderson JM, Klatte EC (2006) Intestinal malrotation in children: a problem-solving approach to the upper gastrointestinal series. Radiographics 26:1485–1500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Orzech N, Navarro OM, Langer JC (2006) Is ultrasonography a good screening test for intestinal malrotation? J Pediatr Surg 41:1005–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Daneman A (2009) Malrotation: the balance of evidence. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 2):S164–S166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pracros JP, Sann L, Genin G et al (1992) Ultrasound diagnosis of midgut volvulus: the "whirlpool" sign. Pediatr Radiol 22(1):18–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shimanuki Y, Aihara T et al (1996) Clockwise whirlpool sign at color Doppler US: an objective and definite sign of midgut volvulus. Radiology 199(1):261–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yousefzadeh DK (2009) The position of the duodenojejunal junction: the wrong horse to bet on in diagnosing or excluding malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 2):S172–S177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yousefzadeh DK, Kang L, Tessicini L (2010) Assessment of retromesenteric position of the third portion of the duodenum: an US feasibility study in 33 newborns. Pediatr Radiol 40:1476–1484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Applegate KE (2009) Evidence-based diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 2):S161–S163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor GA (2011) CT appearance of the duodenum and mesenteric vessels in children with normal and abnormal bowel. Pediatr Radiol 41:1378–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yousefzadeh DK (2011) Regarding online publication of ‘CT appearance of the duodenum and mesenteric vessels in children with normal and abnormal bowel’. Pediatr Radiol 41:1481–1482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renaud Menten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menten, R., Reding, R., Godding, V. et al. Sonographic assessment of the retroperitoneal position of the third portion of the duodenum: an indicator of normal intestinal rotation. Pediatr Radiol 42, 941–945 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2403-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2403-5

Keywords

Navigation