Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric radiology fellows’ experience with intussusception reduction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intussusception reduction allows young children to avoid surgery. However, graduating residents have had relatively little training in intussusception reduction and, for the most part, consider themselves ill-prepared to perform this procedure.

Objective

The goal of this study was to assess the extent of training in intussusception reduction during one year of a pediatric radiology fellowship and to determine whether graduating fellows consider themselves adequately trained in this technique.

Materials and methods

Pediatric radiology fellows were surveyed during June 2010 and asked to characterize their fellowship, to indicate the number of intussusception reductions performed (both the total number and those performed with faculty oversight but without active faculty involvement), and to assess the adequacy of their training.

Results

There were 31 responses, representing almost 1/3 of current fellows. Pediatric radiology fellows perform on average 6.9 reductions, 3.8 of which are with faculty oversight but without active faculty involvement. Ninety percent consider themselves well-trained in the technique, whereas 10% are uncertain (none consider their training inadequate).

Conclusion

Almost all pediatric radiology fellows consider their training in intussusception reduction to be adequate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyer JS, Dangman BC, Buonomo C et al (1993) Air and liquid contrast agents in the management of intussusception: a controlled, randomized trial. Radiology 188:507–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bateni C, Stein-Wexler R, Wootton-Gorges SL et al (2010) Radiology residents’ experience with intussusception reduction. Pediatr Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00247-010-1923-0. Dec 22 [Epub ahead of print]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. Census.gov. Available via http://www.census.gov/geo/www/us_regdiv.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2010

  4. Stein-Wexler R, Sanchez T, Roper GE et al (2010) An interactive teaching device simulating intussusception reduction. Pediatr Radiol 11:1810–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jen HC, Shew SB (2009) The impact of hospital type and experience on the operative utilization in pediatric intussusception: a nationwide study. J Pediatr Surg 44:241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shekherdimian S, Lee SL (2011) Management of pediatric intussusception in general hospitals: diagnosis, treatment, and differences based on age. World J Pediatr 7:70–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daneman A, Alton DJ, Ein S et al (1995) Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children—comparison of perforation with barium and air. Pediatr Radiol 25:81–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirks DR (1995) Air intussusception reduction: “the winds of change”. Pediatr Radiol 25:89–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiels WE, Maves CK, Hedlung GL et al (1991) Air enema for diagnosis and reduction of intussusception: clinical experience and pressure correlates. Radiology 181:169–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shiels WE, Kirks DR, Keller GL et al (1993) John Caffey Award: Colonic perforation by air and liquid enemas: comparison study in young pigs. AJR 160:931–935

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stein M, Alton DJ, Daneman A (1992) Pneumatic reduction of intussusception: 5-year experience. Radiology 183:681–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

Statistical support for this publication was made possible by Grant Number UL1 RR024146 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/overview-translational.asp.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Stein-Wexler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stein-Wexler, R., Bateni, C., Wootton-Gorges, S.L. et al. Pediatric radiology fellows’ experience with intussusception reduction. Pediatr Radiol 41, 1365–1368 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2095-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2095-2

Keywords

Navigation