Abstract
Background
The measurement error for right ventricular (RV) size and function assessed by cardiac MRI (CMRI) in congenital heart disease has not been fully characterized. As CMRI parameters are being increasingly utilized to make clinical decisions, defining error in the clinical setting is critical.
Objective
This investigation examines the repeatability of CMRI for RV size and function.
Materials and methods
Forty consecutive people with congenital heart disease involving the RV were retrospectively identified. Contouring of RV volumes was performed by two expert CMRI clinicians. The coefficient of variability and repeatability coefficients were calculated. Repeatability coefficients were multiplied by the mean value for each group studied to define a threshold beyond which measurement error was unlikely to be responsible.
Results
The variability for indexed RV end-diastolic volume = 3.2% and 3.3% for intra- and interobserver comparisons, respectively. The repeatability coefficients were 13.2% and 14.9% for intra- and interobserver comparisons, which yielded threshold values of 15.1 ml/m^2 and 20.2 ml/m^2, respectively. For RV ejection fraction (EF), the repeatability coefficients for intra- and interobserver comparisons were 5.0% and 6.0%, which resulted in threshold values of 2.6 EF% and 3.0 EF%.
Conclusion
The threshold values generated can be used during serial assessment of RV size and function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CMRI:
-
Cardiac MRI
- EF:
-
Ejection fraction
- RV:
-
Right ventricle
- TOF:
-
Tetralogy of Fallot
References
Lai WW, Gauvreau K, Rivera ES et al (2008) Accuracy of guideline recommendations for two-dimensional quantification of the right ventricle by echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:691–698
Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H et al (2010) Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 31:794–805
Therrien J, Provost Y, Merchant N et al (2005) Optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Am J Cardiol 95:779–782
Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW et al (2007) Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 116:545–551
Geva T (2006) Indications and timing of pulmonary valve replacement after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 11–22
Mooij CF, de Wit CJ, Graham DA et al (2008) Reproducibility of MRI measurements of right ventricular size and function in patients with normal and dilated ventricles. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:67–73
Winter MM, Bernink FJ, Groenink M et al (2008) Evaluating the systemic right ventricle by CMR: the importance of consistent and reproducible delineation of the cavity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:40
Fratz S, Schuhbaeck A, Buchner C et al (2009) Comparison of accuracy of axial slices versus short-axis slices for measuring ventricular volumes by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol 103:1764–1769
Luijnenburg SE, Robbers-Visser D, Moelker A et al (2010) Intra-observer and interobserver variability of biventricular function, volumes and mass in patients with congenital heart disease measured by CMR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:57–64
Sievers B, Kirchberg S, Bakan A et al (2004) Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:9–16
Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, Van der Velde EA et al (1995) Reproducibility of MRI-derived measurements of right ventricular volumes and myocardial mass. Magn Reson Imaging 13:53–63
Strugnell WE, Slaughter RE, Riley RA et al (2005) Modified RV short axis series—a new method for cardiac MRI measurement of right ventricular volumes. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7:769–774
Lytrivi ID, Ko HH, Srivastava S et al (2004) Regional differences in right ventricular systolic function as determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging after infundibulotomy. Am J Cardiol 94:970–973
Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Measurement error. BMJ 313:744
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310
Geva T, Powell AJ (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Feltes TF, Shaddy RE (eds) Moss and Adams’ heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 163–199
Alfakih K, Plein S, Bloomer T et al (2003) Comparison of right ventricular volume measurements between axial and short axis orientation using steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:25–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(MP4 1291 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walsh, R., Salem, Y., Shah, A. et al. Repeatability of cardiac-MRI-measured right ventricular size and function in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 41, 1000–1007 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2033-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2033-3