Abstract
The development of digital radiography (DR) has provided numerous benefits for pediatric imaging, including the ability to post-process images and to make images immediately available for access by care providers. However, DR presents several significant challenges for the radiologic technologists who are responsible for operating the equipment and producing high-quality images in children. This paper discusses those challenges, including lack of standardization among vendors, particularly with regard to the exposure indicator; lack of pediatric-specific educational materials and pediatric techniques; the need for manual technique instead of the use of automatic exposure control in smaller children; and complications related to field size, collimation and shielding in small children. Specific actions and design modifications that might facilitate the effective management of these challenges will be also described. The implementation of measures to promote the production of optimal images while minimizing radiation exposure requires cooperation and communication among imaging professionals, manufacturers and regulatory agencies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Charkot E (2009) Impact of digital radiography on the radiographer. SIIM news 21:9–17
Willis CE, Slovis TL (2004) The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams. A white paper conference. Executive summary 34(suppl3):S162-S164
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284
Goske MJ, Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging Writer’s Group (2008) The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR 109:273–274
Haidar S, Charkot E, Krajewski C et al (2004) The use of copper filter to reduce skin dose of computed radiography for pediatric imaging. Presented at the Radiologic Society of North America (RSNA) meeting, Chicago, IL
Shepard SJ, Wang J, Flynn M et al (2009) An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary). Med Phys 36:2898–2914
Woodward AW, Powers KJ, Kudlas MJ (2008) Online Digital Imaging Academy. [online course] www.asrt.org/Applications/ODIA/ODIAlogin.aspx. Accessed 3 June 2010
Guidance for industry and/or for FDA reviewers/staff and/or compliance: guidance for the submission of 510(k)’s for solid state X-ray imaging devices. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available via http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm073780.htm. Accessed 18 June 2010
Radiation-emitting products. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available via http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmittingProductsandProcedures/MedicalImaging/MedicalX-Rays/ucm175028.htm. Accessed 18 June 2010
White Paper: initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available via http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm. Accessed 18 June 2010
(2007) ACR–AAPM–SIIM Practice guideline for digital radiography. Res. 42. Available via http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/digital_radiography.aspx Last accessed 5/28/2010. Accessed 18 June 2010
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Lois J. Rutz, MSc, and Bruce Whiting, PhD, for their review of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goske, M.J., Charkot, E., Herrmann, T. et al. Image Gently: Challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 41, 611–619 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1957-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1957-3