Skip to main content
Log in

Image Gently: Challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children

  • Minisymposium
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of digital radiography (DR) has provided numerous benefits for pediatric imaging, including the ability to post-process images and to make images immediately available for access by care providers. However, DR presents several significant challenges for the radiologic technologists who are responsible for operating the equipment and producing high-quality images in children. This paper discusses those challenges, including lack of standardization among vendors, particularly with regard to the exposure indicator; lack of pediatric-specific educational materials and pediatric techniques; the need for manual technique instead of the use of automatic exposure control in smaller children; and complications related to field size, collimation and shielding in small children. Specific actions and design modifications that might facilitate the effective management of these challenges will be also described. The implementation of measures to promote the production of optimal images while minimizing radiation exposure requires cooperation and communication among imaging professionals, manufacturers and regulatory agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charkot E (2009) Impact of digital radiography on the radiographer. SIIM news 21:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Willis CE, Slovis TL (2004) The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams. A white paper conference. Executive summary 34(suppl3):S162-S164

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goske MJ, Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging Writer’s Group (2008) The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR 109:273–274

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haidar S, Charkot E, Krajewski C et al (2004) The use of copper filter to reduce skin dose of computed radiography for pediatric imaging. Presented at the Radiologic Society of North America (RSNA) meeting, Chicago, IL

  6. Shepard SJ, Wang J, Flynn M et al (2009) An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary). Med Phys 36:2898–2914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Woodward AW, Powers KJ, Kudlas MJ (2008) Online Digital Imaging Academy. [online course] www.asrt.org/Applications/ODIA/ODIAlogin.aspx. Accessed 3 June 2010

  8. Guidance for industry and/or for FDA reviewers/staff and/or compliance: guidance for the submission of 510(k)’s for solid state X-ray imaging devices. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available via http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm073780.htm. Accessed 18 June 2010

  9. Radiation-emitting products. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available via http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmittingProductsandProcedures/MedicalImaging/MedicalX-Rays/ucm175028.htm. Accessed 18 June 2010

  10. White Paper: initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available via http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm. Accessed 18 June 2010

  11. (2007) ACR–AAPM–SIIM Practice guideline for digital radiography. Res. 42. Available via http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/digital_radiography.aspx Last accessed 5/28/2010. Accessed 18 June 2010

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Lois J. Rutz, MSc, and Bruce Whiting, PhD, for their review of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilyn J. Goske.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goske, M.J., Charkot, E., Herrmann, T. et al. Image Gently: Challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 41, 611–619 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1957-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1957-3

Keywords

Navigation