Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effective dose estimation for pediatric voiding cystourethrography using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The risks associated with radiation exposure are higher in children than in adults. Therefore the use of fluoroscopy in common pediatric examinations such as voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) requires accurate determination of the associated effective dose.

Objective

To estimate effective dose for VCUG examinations performed in children younger than 10 years using anthropomorphic phantoms and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters.

Materials and methods

MOSFETs were placed within four phantoms representing children ≤10 years old, at locations corresponding to radiosensitive organs, and exposed to a mock VCUG (5 min of fluoroscopy, 50 spot exposures) to minimize measurement error. Effective dose was measured and scaled to a standardized clinical VCUG (1 min fluoroscopy, 5 spot exposures) determined from patient logs. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess the accuracy of the measured effective dose. The dose area product (DAP) from each VCUG was compared to the effective dose.

Results

Effective doses ranged from 0.10 to 0.55 mSv, increased with age, and were higher in girls. Fluoroscopy accounted for 88–90% of the total effective dose, and spot exposures 10–12%. MOSFET-measured and simulation-derived effective doses were comparable (T > 0.12). DAP was strongly correlated with effective dose for both genders (r 2>0.97, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Effective doses for VCUG examinations performed in children ≤10 years of age are low but not negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schneider K, Kruger-Stollfub I, Ernst G (2001) Paediatric fluoroscopy – a survey of children’s hospitals in Europe. Pediatr Radiol 31:238–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ICRP (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 60. Annals of the ICRP 21(1-3). Pergamon, Oxford

  3. Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM (1996) Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. AJR 167:1247–1253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapple CL, Broadhead D, Faulkner K (1995) A phantom based method for deriving typical patient doses from measurements of dose area product on populations of patients. Br J Radiol 68:1083–1086

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Almen A, Mattsson S (1995) The radiation dose to children from x-ray examinations of the pelvis and urinary tract. Br J Radiol 68:604–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sulieman A, Theodorou K, Vlychou M et al (2007) Radiation dose measurement and risk estimation for paediatric patients undergoing micturating cystourethrography. Br J Radiol 80:731–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perisinakis K, Raissaki M, Damilakis J et al (2006) Fluoroscopy-controlled voiding cystourethrography in infants and children: are the radiation risks trivial? Eur Radiol 16:846–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fotakis M, Molybda-Athanasopulou E, Psarrakos K et al (2003) Radiation doses to pediatric patients up to 5 years of age undergoing micturating cystourethrography examinations and its dependence on patient age: a Monte Carlo study. Br J Radiol 76:812–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaffe TA, Gaca AM, Delaney S et al (2007) Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn’s disease. AJR 189:1015–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaca AM, Jaffe TA, Delaney S et al (2008) Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdomen/pelvis MDCT in pediatric Crohn disease. Pediatr Radiol 38:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glennie D, Connolly BL, Gordon CL (2008) Entrance skin dose measured with MOSFETs in children undergoing interventional radiography procedures. Pediatr Radiol 38:1180–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi T, Goodman P et al (2007) Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector computed tomography protocols. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:544–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Frush DP et al (2007) Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry. AJR 188:1332–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Research Council (2006) Health risks of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII. National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hiorns MP, Saini A, Marsden PJ (2006) A review of current local dose-area product levels for paediatric fluoroscopy in a tertiary referral centre compared with national standards. Why are they so different? Br J Radiol 79:326–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Agrawalla S, Pearce R, Goodman TR (2004) How to perform the perfect voiding cystourethrography. Pediatr Radiol 34:114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schultz FW, Geleijns J, Holscher HC et al (1999) Radiation burden to paediatric patients due to micturating cystourethrography examinations in a Dutch children’s hospital. Br J Radiol 72:763–772

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Christy M, Eckerman KF (1987) Specific absorbed dose fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources. Appendix A: description of the mathematical phantoms. ORNL/TM-8381/VI. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN

    Google Scholar 

  19. Varchena V, Gubatova DJ, Sidorin V (1993) Children’s heterogeneous phantoms and their application in roentgenology. Radiat Prot Dosim 49:77–78

    Google Scholar 

  20. Varchena V (2002) Pediatric phantoms. Pediatr Radiol 32:280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Servomaa A, Tapiovaara M (1998) Organ dose calculation in medical x ray examinations by the program PCXMC. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hart D, Hillier MC, Walls BF (2002) Doses to patients from medical x-ray examinations in the UK – 2000 review. NRPB-W14. National Radiation Protection Board, Chilton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hart D, Hillier MC, Jones DG (2007) Doses to patients from radiographic and fluoroscopic x-ray imaging procedures in the UK – 2005 review. HPA-RPD-029. Health Protection Agency, Chilton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chapple CL, Faulkner K, Lee RE et al (1992) Results of a survey of doses to paediatric patients undergoing common radiological examinations. Br J Radiol 65:225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1996) Estimation of effective doses from pediatric x-ray examinations. NRPB-R279. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brenner D (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical and Health Physics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

    Ryan Lee

  2. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Rm 2172A, Toronto, Canada, M5G 1X8

    Karen E. Thomas, Michelle Falkiner & Christopher L. Gordon

  3. Image-Guided Therapy, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

    Bairbre L. Connolly

Authors
  1. Ryan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen E. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bairbre L. Connolly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michelle Falkiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christopher L. Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher L. Gordon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, R., Thomas, K.E., Connolly, B.L. et al. Effective dose estimation for pediatric voiding cystourethrography using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology. Pediatr Radiol 39, 608–615 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1161-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1161-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation