Abstract
Background
Artefacts reflect problems with radiographic technique rather than true pathology. These may be misinterpreted as pathology with serious consequences. An artefact caused such problems in one paediatric imaging department.
Objective
To determine the incidence, and consequences of misinterpretation, of a CT artefact in a paediatric imaging department.
Materials and methods
A retrospective review of images and reports of paediatric CT scans over a set period with a known artefact was performed. Reports were correlated with reviewers’ evaluation of the presence of artefact and reviewed for correct identification of artefact, misinterpretation as pathology, and action taken as a result.
Results
A total of 74 CT scans had been performed over the study period and an artefact detected by reviewers on 32 (43%). Six (18.75%) of these were misinterpreted as pathology, of which three (9.4%) were reported as tuberculous granulomas, two (6.2%) as haemorrhages and one (3.1%) as an unknown hyperdensity. Two patients (6.2%) had subsequent MRI studies performed, and treatment for tuberculosis was continued in one patient (3.1%).
Conclusion
No initial report identified the artefact. One-fifth of the scans with the artefact were misinterpreted as pathology and half of these misinterpretations led to further action. Artefacts result in false diagnoses and unnecessary investigations; vigilance is needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artefacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 24:1679–1691
Cody DD, Stevens DM, Ginsberg LE (2005) Multi-detector-row CT artefacts that mimic disease. Radiology 236:756–761
Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Paik DS et al (2000) Stair-step artefacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT. Radiology 216:185–196
McCollough CH (2002) Optimization of multidetector array CT acquisition parameters for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27:253–259
Bahner ML, Reith W, Zuna I et al (1998) Spiral CT vs incremental CT: is spiral CT superior in imaging of the brain? Eur Radiol 8:416–420
van Straten M, Venema HW, Majoie CB et al (2006) Image quality of multisection CT of the brain: Thickly collimated sequential scanning versus thinly collimated spiral scanning with image combining. AJNR 28:421–427
Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO et al (2004) Pitfalls, artefacts and remedies in multi-detector-row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics 24:787–800
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
du Plessis, AM., Theron, S. & Andronikou, S. The effects of misinterpretation of an artefact on multidetector row CT scans in children. Pediatr Radiol 39, 137–141 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1052-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1052-1