Skip to main content
Log in

Nonfluoroscopic pressure colostography in the evaluation of genitourinary fistula of anorectal malformations: experience in a resource-poor environment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Radiological imaging is paramount for defining the genitourinary fistulae commonly associated with anorectal malformations prior to definitive surgery. The imaging options are resource-limited in many parts of the world. Nonfluoroscopic pressure colostography after colostomy is a cheap method for the evaluation of anorectal malformations.

Objective

To describe our experience with nonfluoroscopic pressure colostography in the evaluation of anorectal malformations in boys.

Materials and methods

The study included 12 boys with anorectal malformation who had colostomy and nonfluoroscopic pressure-augmented colostography with water-soluble contrast medium between January 2006 and December 2007.

Results

Patient ages ranged from 2 days to 1 year. The types of genitourinary fistula were rectovesical (7.7%) and rectourethral (92.3%). Oblique radiographs were of diagnostic value in all patients. The types of anorectal malformations were high, intermediate and low in 75%, 8.3% and 16.7%, respectively. Short-segment urethral constriction was a common feature of rectourethral fistula (75%, n=9).

Conclusion

Our experience has shown that genitourinary fistulae associated with anorectal malformations can be demonstrated reliably by nonfluoroscopic pressure colostography with two oblique radiographs, providing an option in resource-poor settings where fluoroscopic equipment is scarce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Endo M, Hayashi A, Ishihara M et al (1999) Analysis of 1,992 patients with anorectal malformations over the past two decades in Japan. Steering Committee of Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 34:435–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spouge D, Baird PA (1986) Imperforate anus in 700,000 consecutive liveborn infants. Am J Med Genet Suppl 2:151–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nievelstein RA, Vos A, Valk J (1998) MR imaging of anorectal malformations and associated anomalies. Eur Radiol 8:573–581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McHugh K (1998) The role of radiology in children with anorectal anomalies with particular emphasis on MRI. Eur J Radiol 26:194–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beek FJ, Boemers TM, Beek FJ et al (1995) Spine evaluation in children with anorectal malformations. Pediatr Radiol 25:28–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peña A (1995) Anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 4:35–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta AK, Guglani B (2005) Imaging of congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract. Indian J Pediatr 72:403–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uba AF, Chirdan LB, Ardill W et al (2006) Anorectal anomaly: a review of 82 cases seen at JUTH, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 13:61–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Adeyemi SD, de Rocha-Afodu JT (1982) Management of imperforate anus at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria: a review of ten years’ experience. Prog Pediatr Surg 15:187–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levitt MA, Peña A (2007) Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gross GW, Wolfson PJ, Pena A (1991) Augmented-pressure colostogram in imperforate anus with fistula. Pediatr Radiol 21:560–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Narasimharao KL, Prasad GR, Katariya S et al (1983) Prone cross table lateral view: an alternative to the invertogram in imperforate anus. AJR 140:227–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lernau OZ, Jancu J, Nissan S (1978) Demonstration of rectourinary fistulas by pressure gastrografin enema. J Pediatr Surg 13:497–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim IO, Han TI, Kim WS et al (2000) Transperineal ultrasonography in imperforate anus: identification of the internal fistula. J Ultrasound Med 19:211–216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang C, Lin J, Lim K (1997) The use of augmented-pressure colostography in imperforate anus. Pediatr Surg Int 12:383–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Motovic A, Kovalivker M, Man B et al (1979) The value of transperineal injection for the diagnosis of imperforate anus. Ann Surg 190:668–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adeniran JO, Abdur-Rahman LO (2005) One-stage correction of intermediate imperforate anus in males. Pediatr Surg Int 21:88–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Currarino G (1996) The various types of anorectal fistula in male imperforate anus. Pediatr Radiol 26:512–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adekunle Yisau Abdulkadir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdulkadir, A.Y., Abdur-Rahman, L.O. & Adesiyun, O.M. Nonfluoroscopic pressure colostography in the evaluation of genitourinary fistula of anorectal malformations: experience in a resource-poor environment. Pediatr Radiol 39, 132–136 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1051-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1051-2

Keywords

Navigation