Pediatric Radiology

, 38:675 | Cite as

Contemporary imaging in abdominal emergencies

  • Carlos J. SivitEmail author


Imaging is often a fundamental part in the evaluation of an injured or ill child. A variety of imaging modalities (radiography, angiography/fluoroscopy, sonography, CT, magnetic resonance imaging and scintigraphy) are among the options. CT is worth focused attention because of its usefulness in a variety of emergency department settings, its increasing use, and its potential radiation risks. CT plays an important role in the evaluation of traumatic and nontraumatic abdominal emergencies in children. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to review current imaging approaches and controversies in the evaluation of common acute abdominal emergencies. Through discussion of various modalities, especially CT in evaluation of abdominal pain and trauma, the relative advantages and disadvantages including radiation risk will be reviewed.


CT Abdominal trauma Acute abdomen Children 


  1. 1.
    Henderson J, Goldacre MJ, Fairweather JM (1992) Conditions accounting for substantial time spent in hospital in children age 1–14 years of age. Arch Dis Child 67:83–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Britt H, Bridges-Webb C, Sayer GP et al (1994) The diagnostic difficulties of abdominal pain. Aust Fam Physician 23:375–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP et al (1996) Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics 98:680–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brewer BJ, Golden GT, Hitch DC et al (1976) Abdominal pain: an analysis of 1,000 consecutive cases in a university hospital emergency room. Am J Surg 131:219–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janik JS, Firor HV (1979) Pediatric appendicitis: a 20-year study of 1,640 children at Cook County (Illinois) Hospital. Arch Surg 114:717–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sivit CJ, Newman KD, Boenning DA et al (1992) Appendicitis: usefulness of US in a pediatric population. Radiology 185:549–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gamal R, Moore TC (1990) Appendicitis in children aged 13 years and younger. Am J Surg 159:589–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adolph VR, Falterman KW (1996) Appendicitis in children in the managed care era. J Pediatr Surg 31:1035–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siegel MJ, Carel C, Surratt S (1991) Ultrasonography of acute abdominal pain in children. JAMA 266:1987–1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sivit CJ, Newman KD, Boenning DA et al (1992) Appendicitis: usefulness of US in a pediatric population. Radiology 185:549–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garcia-Pena BM, Mandl KD, Kraus SJ et al (1999) Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children. JAMA 282:1041–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW et al (1999) Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 229:344–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE et al (2001) The impact of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 220:103–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garcia-Pena BM, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ et al (2000) Costs and effectiveness of ultrasonography and limited computed tomography for diagnosing appendicitis in children. Pediatrics 106:672–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Berlin SC et al (2000) Helical CT for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children. Radiology 216:430–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Puig S, Staudenherz A, Felder-Puig R et al (2008) Imaging of appendicitis in children and adolescents: useful or useless? A comparison of imaging techniques and a critical review of the current literature. Semin Roentgenol 43:22–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh A, Danrad R, Hahn PF et al (2007) MR imaging of the acute abdomen and pelvis: acute appendicitis and beyond. Radiographics 27:1419–1431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruess L, Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR et al (1995) Blunt hepatic and splenic trauma in children: correlation of a CT injury severity scale with clinical outcome. Pediatr Radiol 25:321–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stylianos S (2002) Compliance with evidence-based guidelines in children with isolated spleen or liver injury: a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 37:453–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ruess L, Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR et al (1997) Blunt abdominal trauma in children: impact of CT on operative and nonoperative management. AJR 169:1011–1014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neish AS, Taylor GA, Lund DP et al (1998) Effect of CT information on the diagnosis and management of acute abdominal injury in children. Radiology 206:327–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bulas DI, Eichelberger MR, Sivit CJ et al (1993) Hepatic injury from blunt trauma in children: follow-up evaluation with CT. AJR 160:347–351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benya EC, Bulas DI, Eichelberger MR et al (1995) Splenic injury from blunt abdominal trauma in children: follow-up examination with CT. Radiology 195:685–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stylianos S (2000) Evidence-based guidelines for resource utilization in children with isolated spleen or liver injury. The APSA Trauma Committee. J Pediatr Surg 35:164–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dillman JR, Strouse PJ, Ellis H et al (2007) Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to IV nonionic iodinated contrast material in children. AJR 188:1643–1647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Department of RadiologyRainbow Babies and Children’s HospitalClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations