Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Problems in the diagnosis of metaphyseal fractures

  • Review
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr, Richmond JM et al (1995) Inflicted skeletal injury: a postmortem radiologic–histopathologic study in 31 infants. AJR 165:647–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kleinman P (1998) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse,, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caffey J (1946) Multiple fractures in the long bones of infants suffering from chronic subdural hematoma. AJR 56:163–173

    Google Scholar 

  4. Silverman F (1953) The roentgen manifestations of unrecognized skeletal trauma in infants. AJR 69:413–427

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Caffey J (1957) Some traumatic lesions in growing bones other than fractures and dislocations: clinical and radiological features. Br J Radiol 30:225–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters M, Starling S, Barnes-Eley M et al (2008) The presence of bruising associated with fracture. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med (in press)

  7. American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Radiology: Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Pediatrics 105:1345–1348

  8. Zimmerman S, Makoroff K, Care M et al (2005) Utility of follow-up skeletal surveys in suspected child physical abuse evaluations. Child Abuse Negl 29:1075–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kemp AM, Butler A, Morris S et al (2006) Which radiological investigations should be performed to identify fractures in suspected child abuse? Clin Radiol 61:723–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lachman R (2007) Taybi and Lachman’s radiology of syndromes, metabolic disorders and skeletal dysplasias, 5th edn. Elsevier, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll DM, Doria AS, Paul BS (2007) Clinical–radiological features of fractures in premature infants—a review. J Perinat Med 35:366–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gartner LM, Greer FR (2003) Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency: new guidelines for vitamin D intake. Pediatrics 111:908–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goulding A, Grant AM (2006) Fractures in children and nutrition. Curr Opin Orthop 17:438–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Snedecor S, Wilson H (1949) Some obstetrical injuries to the long bones. J Bone Joint Surg 31A:378–384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ekengren K, Bergdahl S, Ekstrom G (1978) Birth injuries to the epiphyseal cartilage. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 19:197–204

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gresham EL (1975) Birth trauma. Pediatr Clin North Am 22:317–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Connell A, Donoghue VB (2007) Can classic metaphyseal lesions follow uncomplicated caesarean section? Pediatr Radiol 37:488–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Paterson CR, Burns J, McAllion SJ (1993) Osteogenesis imperfecta: the distinction from child abuse and the recognition of a variant form. Am J Med Genet 45:187–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Paterson CR, McAllion SJ (2006) Classical osteogenesis imperfecta and allegations of nonaccidental injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chapman S, Hall CM (1997) Non-accidental injury or brittle bones. Pediatr Radiol 27:106–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ablin DS, Sane SM (1997) Non-accidental injury: confusion with temporary brittle bone disease and mild osteogenesis imperfecta. Pediatr Radiol 27:111–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller ME (1999) Temporary brittle bone disease: a true entity? Semin Perinatol 23:174–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller M, Hangartner TN (1999) Temporary brittle bone disease: associated with decreased fetal movement and osteopenia. Calcif Tissue Int 64:137–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller ME (2003) The lesson of temporary brittle bone disease: all bones are not created equal. Bone 33:466–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller ME (2005) Hypothesis: fetal movement influences fetal and infant bone strength. Med Hypotheses 65:880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Spivack B (2000) Contributing editor’s note. Child Abuse Quarterly Medical Update 8:20

    Google Scholar 

  27. Temporary brittle bone disease—statement from the SPR Child Abuse Committee. Society of Pediatric Radiology. http://pedrad.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=18 Cited on March 3 2008

  28. Mendelson KL (2005) Critical review of ‘temporary brittle bone disease’. Pediatr Radiol 35:1036–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jenny C (2006) Evaluating infants and young children with multiple fractures. Pediatrics 118:1299–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Laval-Jeantet M, Balmain N, Juster M et al (1968) [Relations of the perichondral ring to the cartilage in normal and pathologic growth]. Ann Radiol (Paris) 11:327–335

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Grayev A, Boal D, Wallach D et al (2001) Metaphyseal fractures mimicking abuse during treatment for clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol 31:559–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. ACR practice guideline for skeletal surveys in children (Res. 47, 17, 35). American College of Radiology: ACR Standards (Reston, VA, American College of Radiology), pp 145–149

  33. Standard for skeletal surveys in suspected non-accidental injury (NAI) in children. The British Society of Paediatric Radiology. http://www.bspr.org.uk/. Cited 25 Feb 2008

  34. Offiah AC, Moon L, Hall CM et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of fracture detection in suspected non-accidental injury: the effect of edge enhancement and digital display on observer performance. Clin Radiol 61:163–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kleinman PL, Zurakowski D, Strauss K et al (2008) Dose reduction and image optimization with CR in the detection of simulated inflicted metaphyseal fractures in a fetal pig model. Radiology (in press)

  36. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr (1998) A regional approach to the classic metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: the distal femur. Am J Roentgenol 170:43–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radiology Department, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, 02115, MA, USA

    Paul K. Kleinman

Authors
  1. Paul K. Kleinman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul K. Kleinman.

Additional information

Prof. Kleinman has disclosed that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinman, P.K. Problems in the diagnosis of metaphyseal fractures. Pediatr Radiol 38 (Suppl 3), 388–394 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0845-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0845-6

Search

Navigation