Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging of hypospadias: pre- and postoperative appearances

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypospadias is a common condition that is typically diagnosed and repaired in early life. Boys with hypospadias can present with complications from their surgery months to years later. Imaging in patients with hypospadias is usually accomplished by retrograde urethrography (RUG) and less commonly by voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). This pictorial essay demonstrates the fluoroscopic appearances of hypospadias preoperatively as well as the normal postoperative appearance and a variety of complications that can occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ (1997) Hypospadias trends in two US surveillance systems. Pediatrics 100:831–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ikoma F, Shima H (1991) Caudal migration of the verumontanum. J Pediatr Surg 26:858–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baskin LS, Ebbers MB (2006) Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg 41:463–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McArdle F, Lebowitz R (1975) Uncomplicated hypospadias and anomalies of upper urinary tract. Need for screening? Urology 5:712–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rozenman J, Hertz M, Boichis H (1979) Radiological findings of the urinary tract in hypospadias: a report of 110 cases. Clin Radiol 30:471–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Borer JG, Retik AB (1999) Current trends in hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 26:15–37, vii

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. MacLellan DL, Diamond DA (2006) Recent advances in external genitalia. Pediatr Clin North Am 53:449–464, vii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baran CN, Tiftikcioglu YO, Ozdemir R et al (2004) What is new in the treatment of hypospadias? Plast Reconstr Surg 114:743–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Snodgrass WT (2004) Consultation with the specialist: hypospadias. Pediatr Rev 25:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cilento BG Jr, Atala A (2002) Proximal hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am 29:311–328, vi

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Retik AB, Atala A (2002) Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 29:329–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mouriquand PD, Mure PY (2004) Current concepts in hypospadiology. BJU Int 93 [Suppl 3]:26–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Richter F, Pinto PA, Stock JA et al (2003) Management of recurrent urethral fistulas after hypospadias repair. Urology 61:448–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Retik AB, Keating M, Mandell J (1988) Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 15:223–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanne S. Chow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milla, S.S., Chow, J.S. & Lebowitz, R.L. Imaging of hypospadias: pre- and postoperative appearances. Pediatr Radiol 38, 202–208 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0697-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0697-5

Keywords

Navigation