Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Age-dependent dynamic sonographic measurement of pediatric clubfoot

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

US shows promise in evaluating clubfeet. In order to assess responses to therapy, the measurements of normal feet and clubfeet must be known.

Objective

To investigate the role of US measurement in quantitatively evaluating normal feet and clubfeet in children, and to assess changes in these feet with age.

Materials and methods

Patients <1 year old with unilateral or bilateral clubfoot deformity underwent US examination of the foot with specific attention to the medial malleolar to navicular (MMN) distance. Measurements were made in neutral and full adduction positions, and in the abduction position simulating the Ponseti maneuver. Children undergoing US for other reasons had the same imaging performed and served as controls.

Results

A total of 127 feet in 66 children were evaluated (20 children had bilateral clubfeet, 25 had unilateral clubfoot, and 21 had normal feet). Clubfeet had significantly (P < 0.001) lower MMN measurements at all three positions than control feet. These distances increased with patient age for both normal feet and clubfeet, but the rate of increase was less for clubfeet.

Conclusion

Normal feet and clubfeet exhibit marked differences in MMN distances, as well as differences in rate of change over time. By understanding the age-dependent variability of normal feet and clubfeet, dynamic sonography can help assess clubfoot anatomy and could help to assess the effect of treatment interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dobbs M, Morcuende J, Gurnett C et al (2000) Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: an historical review. Iowa Orthop J 20:59–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aurell Y, Adlercreutz C, Andriesse H et al (2004) Repeatability of sonographic measurements in clubfeet. Acta Radiol 45:622–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aurell Y, Johansson A, Hansson G et al (2002) Ultrasound anatomy in the normal neonatal and infant foot: an anatomic introduction to ultrasound assessment of foot deformities. Eur Radiol 12:2306–2312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhns L, Koujok K, Hall J et al (2003) Ultrasound of the navicular during the simulated Ponseti maneuver. J Pediatr Orthop 23:243–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aurell Y, Johansson A, Hansson G et al (2002) Ultrasound anatomy in the neonatal clubfoot. Eur Radiol 12:2509–2517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tolat V, Boothroyd A, Carty H et al (1995) Ultrasound: a helpful guide in the treatment of congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:65–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roye B, Hyman J, Roye D (2004) Congenital idiopathic talipes equinovarus. Pediatr Rev 25:124–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz D, Albanese E, Levinsohn E et al (2003) Pulsed color-flow Doppler analysis of arterial deficiency in idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 23:84–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Furdon S, Donlon C (2002) Examination of the newborn foot: positional and structural abnormalities. Adv Neonatal Care 2:248–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ponseti I (ed) (1996) Congenital clubfoot: fundamentals of treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ippolito E (1995) Update on pathologic anatomy of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:17–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Noonan K, Richards B (2003) Nonsurgical management of idiopathic clubfoot. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:392–402

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dobbs M, Rudzki J, Purcell D et al (2004) Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86A:22–27

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morcuende J, Dolan L, Dietz F et al (2004) Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics 113:376–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herzenberg J, Radler C, Bor N (2002) Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 22:517–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Simons G (1977) Analytical radiography of clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59B:485–488

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bansal V, Daniel J, Rai J (1988) Radiological score in the assessment of clubfoot. Int Orthop 12:181–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chami M, Daoud A, Maestro M et al (1996) Ultrasound contribution in the analysis of the newborn and infant normal and clubfoot: a preliminary study. Pediatr Radiol 26:298–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cahuzac J, Navascues J, Baunin C et al (2002) Assessment of the position of the navicular by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in infant foot deformities. J Pediatr Orthop B 11:134–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pirani S, Zeznik L, Hodges D (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging study of the congenital clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method. J Pediatr Orthop 21:719–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saito S, Hatori M, Kokubun S et al (2004) Evaluation of calcaneal malposition by magnetic resonance imaging in the infantile clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 13:99–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gigante C, Talenti E, Turra S (2004) Sonographic assessment of clubfoot. J Clin Ultrasound 32:235–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maiza D, Themar-Noel C, Legrand I et al (1995) Ultrasonographic approach to the neonatal foot: preliminary study. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:123–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Napiontek M (1995) Intraoperative ultrasound for evaluation of reduction in congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:55–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamel J, Becker W (1996) Sonographic assessment of clubfoot deformity in young children. J Pediatr Orthop B 5:279–286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldner J, Fitch R (1994) Classification and evaluation of congenital talipes equinovarus. In: Simons G (ed) The clubfoot. Springer, Berlin, pp 120–139

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wallander H, Aurell Y, Hansson G (2007) No association between residual forefoot adduction and the position of the navicular in clubfeet treated by posterior release. J Pediatr Orthop 27:60–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P et al (1995) Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:129–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank John Hayes, PhD, and Stacy Hoshaw-Woodard, PhD, for statistical support and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian D. Coley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coley, B.D., Shiels, W.E., Kean, J. et al. Age-dependent dynamic sonographic measurement of pediatric clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol 37, 1125–1129 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0601-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0601-3

Keywords

Navigation