Pediatric Radiology

, 37:829 | Cite as

Bone malformations in Proteus syndrome: an analysis of bone structural changes and their evolution during growth

  • Ugo E. Pazzaglia
  • Giampiero Beluffi
  • Giovanni BonaspettiEmail author
  • Federico Ranchetti
Case Report


The radiographic follow-up of a patient with Proteus syndrome is presented. Review of radiographs obtained at 3 years 10 months, 10 years, and 17 years 8 months indicated that the rate of growth in length of the oversized tubular bones of the hands was similar to that of the normal bones of the same hand. This observation supports the view that the primary lesion occurs in the early embryonic period, when the limb bud mesenchyme cells condense and cartilage differentiates producing oversized cartilage anlages, rather than being a defect of bone cell-mediated apposition and modelling processes of bone. Additional radiographs of the pelvis and spine were obtained at age 4 years 10 months and head CT at 8 years 10 months. This pathogenetic mechanism fits well with the hypothesis of somatic mosaicism, which is at present the most credible explanation for the aetiology of Proteus syndrome. Other skeletal malformations recognized as typical of the syndrome can be interpreted as secondary adaptations to the altered mechanical conditions induced by overgrowth of bones.


Proteus syndrome Bone growth Bone malformation Child 



The authors are grateful to Prof. Roberto Burgio for making available the clinical files of the case he published in 1983 and for his useful suggestions during preparation of this paper.


  1. 1.
    Cohen MM Jr, Hayden PW (1979) A newly recognized hamartomatous syndrome. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 15:291–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wiedemann HR, Burgio GR, Aldenhoff P et al (1983) The Proteus syndrome. Partial gigantism of the hands and/or feet, nevi, hemihypertrophy, subcutaneous tumors, macrocephaly or other skull anomalies and possible accelerated growth and visceral affections. Eur J Pediatr 140:5–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jamis-Dow CA, Turner J, Biesecker LG et al (2004) Radiologic manifestation of Proteus syndrome. Radiographics 24:1051–1068PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beluffi G, Di Giulio G, Fiori P (1990) Pelvic lipomatosis in the Proteus syndrome: a further diagnostic sign. Eur J Pediatr 149:866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biesecker LG, Peters KF, Darling TN et al (1998) Clinical differentiation between Proteus syndrome and hemihyperplasia: description of a distinct form of hemihyperplasia. Am J Med Genet 79:311–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biesecker LG, Happle R, Mulliken JB et al (1999) Proteus syndrome: diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and patient evaluation. Am J Med Genet 84:389–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turner JT, Cohen MM Jr, Biesecker LG (2004) Reassessment of the Proteus syndrome literature: application of diagnostic criteria to published cases. Am J Med Genet A 130:111–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shaw C, Bourke J, Dixon J (1993) Proteus syndrome with cardiomyopathy and a myocardial mass. Am J Med Genet 46:145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Costa T, Fitch N, Azouz EM (1985) Proteus syndrome: report of two cases with pelvic lipomatosis. Pediatrics 76:984–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ben Becher S, Bouaziz A, Harbi MM et al (1993) Syndrome de Protée associé à une lithiase rénale avec reflux vésico-urétéral. Arch Fr Pediatr 50:599–601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skovby F, Graham JM Jr, Sonne-Holm S et al (1993) Compromise of the spinal canal in Proteus syndrome. Am J Med Genet 47:656–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagari Y, Aso M, Shimao S et al (1992) Proteus syndrome: report of the first Japanese case with special reference to differentiation from Klippel Trenaunay Weber syndrome. J Dermatol 19: 477–480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sayama K, Hato N, Matsuda O et al (1994) Proteus syndrome. Dermatology 189:392–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rivas R, Shapiro F (2002) Structural stages in the development of the long bones and epiphyses: a study in the New Zealand white rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:85–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nishimura G, Kozlowski K (1990) Proteus syndrome (report of three cases). Australas Radiol 34:47–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark RD, Donnai D, Rogers J et al (1987) Proteus syndrome: an expanded phenotype. Am J Med Genet 27:99–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen MM Jr (1993) Proteus syndrome: clinical evidence for somatic mosaicism and selective review. Am J Med Genet 47:645–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bale PM, Watson G, Collins F (1993) Pathology of osseous and genitourinary lesions of Proteus syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 13:797–809Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bender BL, Yunis E (1979) Fibrocartilaginous lesions of bone and hemangiomas and lipomas of soft tissue resembling Maffucci’s syndrome. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:1104–1108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guidera KJ, Brinker MR, Kousseff BG et al (1993) Overgrowth management in Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber and Proteus syndromes. J Pediatr Orthop 13:459–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dickson RA, Lawton JO, Archer IA et al (1984) The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Biplanar spinal asymmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:8–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen MM (2005) Proteus syndrome: an update. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 137:38–52PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ugo E. Pazzaglia
    • 1
  • Giampiero Beluffi
    • 2
  • Giovanni Bonaspetti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Federico Ranchetti
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedic ClinicUniversity of Brescia Spedali Civili di BresciaBresciaItaly
  2. 2.Pediatric Radiology DepartmentFondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San MatteoPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations