Skip to main content
Log in

Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis in children: can CT predict outcome?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The optimal treatment of perforated appendicitis remains controversial, but there is a trend toward nonoperative management. CT scanning might be helpful in determining which patients could benefit from this treatment option.

Objective

To determine the value of CT imaging in predicting clinical success or failure in children with nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis.

Materials and methods

Admission CT scans of 34 children with perforated appendicitis treated nonoperatively between January 2003 and June 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. All children were given intravenous antibiotics. Clinical outcome was correlated with imaging findings including the maximal area, number and complexity of collections, presence of an appendicolith or extraluminal air, and extent of intra-abdominal disease outside the right lower quadrant. Patients with an accessible simple collection were drained if their clinical condition did not improve.

Results

Successful nonoperative management was achieved in 20 patients; 14 patients failed nonoperative therapy. The presence of collections in three or more sectors (defined as the pelvis and four abdominal quadrants) correlated strongly with clinical failure (P < 0.05), while there was no correlation found between clinical outcome and the presence of an appendicolith, extraluminal air, distant ascites, and collection size or complexity.

Conclusion

In the nonoperative management of children with perforated appendicitis, admission CT findings demonstrating disease beyond the right lower quadrant correlate with treatment failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber TR, Keller MA, Bower RJ et al (2003) Is delayed operative treatment worth the trouble with perforated appendicitis in children? Am J Surg 186:685–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM et al (2001) Initial non-operative management for periappendiceal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum 44:936–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vargas HI, Averbook A, Stamos MJ (1994) Appendiceal mass: conservative therapy followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 60:753–758

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skoubo-Kristensen E, Hvid I (1982) The appendiceal mass: results of conservative management. Ann Surg 196:584–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kogut KA, Blakely ML, Schropp KP et al (2001) The association of elevated percent bands on admission with failure and complications of interval appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 36:165–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Keyzer C, Tack D, de Maertelaer V et al (2004) Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose enhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 232:164–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Callahan MJ, Rodriguez DP, Taylor GA (2002) CT of appendicitis in children. Radiology 224:325–332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor GA, Callahan MJ, Rodriguez D et al (2006) CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors. Pediatr Radiol 36:331–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez DP, Vargas S, Callahan MJ et al (2006) Appendicitis in young children: imaging experience and clinical outcomes. AJR 186:1158–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaffe BM, Berger DH (2005) The appendix. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR et al (eds) Schwartz’s principles of surgery, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1119–1137

    Google Scholar 

  11. McPherson A, Kinmonth J (1945) Acute appendicitis and the appendix mass. Br J Surg 32:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown CVR, Abrishami M, Muller M et al (2003) Appendiceal abscess: immediate operation or percutaneous drainage? Am J Surg 69:829–832

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erdogan D, Karaman I, Narci A et al (2005) Comparison of two methods for the management of appendicular mass in children. Pediatr Surg Int 21:81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nadler EP, Reblock KK, Vaughan KG et al (2004) Predictors of outcome for children with perforated appendicitis initially treated with non-operative management. Surg Infect 5:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bufo AJ, Shah RS, Li MH et al (1998) Interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8:209–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hormann M, Kreuzer S, Sacher P et al (2001) Abscesses after appendectomy due to intra-operative retaining of fecalith. Rofo 173:720–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai H, Shan Y, Lin P et al (2006) Clinical analysis of the predictive factors for recurrent appendicitis after initial non-operative treatment of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 192:311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jamieson DH, Chait PG, Filler R (1997) Interval drainage of appendiceal abscesses in children. AJR 169:1619–1622

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Levin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levin, T., Whyte, C., Borzykowski, R. et al. Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis in children: can CT predict outcome?. Pediatr Radiol 37, 251–255 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0384-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0384-y

Keywords

Navigation