Tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia: are pull-back tube esophagograms needed for diagnosis?
- 299 Downloads
A pull-back tube esophagogram (PBTE) is widely accepted in the literature as the radiological investigation of choice for the diagnosis of tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. However, PBTE is rarely performed in our institution, as we have been successful in confirming the presence of such fistulae with a contrast material swallow (CS). We hypothesized that PBTE is not the radiological investigation of choice for the diagnosis of the fistula in this condition.
We sought to determine what proportion of patients with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia can be diagnosed promptly by a CS and what the indications are for a PBTE.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological findings in patients with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia to determine whether the fistula was diagnosed with a CS or PBTE.
We identified 20 children (13 female and 7 male) with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. Their age at diagnosis ranged from 3 days to 168 months with a median of 9 days. The diagnosis was documented by CS in 12, PBTE in 7 and CT in 1. In three of the seven who had the fistula documented by PBTE, a previous CS had shown contrast material in the trachea, but no fistulous tract or aspiration was identified.
We believe that CS should be the examination of choice in most patients suspected of having a tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. A PBTE is indicated in patients who are intubated or are at significant risk of aspiration. Furthermore, a PBTE is also indicated where contrast material is seen in the airway on CS and there is uncertainty whether this is due to aspiration or a fistula.
KeywordsEsophagus Fistula Trachea Children
- 1.Leonidas JC, Singh SP, Slovis TL (2004) Congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Kuhn JP, Slovis TL, Haller JO (eds) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, vol. 1. Mosby, Philadelphia, p 113Google Scholar
- 5.Cohen SR (1970) The diagnosis and surgical management of congenital tracheo-esophageal fistula without atresia of the esophagus. Ann Otol Laryngol 79:1101–1105Google Scholar
- 8.Schneider KM, Becker JM (1962) The “H-type” tracheo-esophageal fistula in infants and children. J Pediatr 51:677–686Google Scholar
- 12.Ryan S (2002) Postnatal imaging of chest malformations. In: Donoghue V (ed) Radiological imaging of the neonatal chest. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 93–109Google Scholar
- 13.Schlesinger AE, Parker BR (2004) Congenital esophageal malformations. In: Kuhn JP, Slovis TL, Haller JO (eds) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, vol. 2. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 1550–1560Google Scholar
- 14.Bedard P, Girvan DP, Shandling B (1974) Congenital H-type tracheo-esophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 8:205–211Google Scholar
- 17.Kattamasu SR, Stringer DA (2000) Pharynx and esophagus. In: Stringer D, Babyn P (eds) Pediatric gastrointestinal imaging and intervention, 2nd edn. BC Decker, Hamilton, pp 161–236Google Scholar
- 18.O’Dwyer H, Twomey E, Ryan S (2002) Congenital H-type tracheo-esophageal fistula. http://www.eurorad.org/case.cfm?UID=1691. 23 June 2002
- 19.Lamb DS (1873) A fatal case of congenital tracheo-esophageal fistula. Philadelphia Medical Times 3:705Google Scholar
- 27.Swischuk LE (2003) Imaging of the newborn, infant, and young child, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 350–355Google Scholar
- 34.Helmsworth J, Pryles C (1951) Congenital tracheo-esophageal fistula without atresia. J Pediatr 38:601Google Scholar