Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Direct X-ray radiogrammetry versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: assessment of bone density in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and growth hormone deficiency

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In recent years interest in bone densitometry in children has increased.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical application of digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) and compare the results with those of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Materials and methods

A total of 41 children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and 26 children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) were included in this longitudinal study. Radiographs of the left hand were obtained and used for DXR. DXA of the total body and of the lumbar spine was performed.

Results

In both study populations significant correlations between DXR and DXA were found, and, with the exception of the correlation between DXR bone mineral density (DXR-BMD) and bone mineral apparent density in the GHD population, all correlations had a P-value of <0.001. During treatment a change in DXR-BMD was found in children with GHD.

Conclusions

Our study showed that DXR in a paediatric population shows a strong correlation with DXA of the lumbar spine and total body and that it is able to detect a change in BMD during treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, et al (1996) Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art [review]. J Bone Miner Res 11:707–730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fässler AC, Bonjour J-P (1995) Osteoporosis as a pediatric problem. Pediatr Clin North Am 42:811–824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonjour J-P, Theintz G, Buchs B, et al (1991) Critical years and stages of puberty for spinal and femoral bone mass accumulation during adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:555–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boot AM, Bouquet J, de Ridder MA, et al (1997) Determinants of body composition, measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry, in Dutch children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 66:232–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan GM (1992) Performance of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in evaluating bone, lean body mass, and fat in pediatric subjects. J Bone Miner Res 7:369–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Henderson RC, Lark RK, Newman JE, et al (2002) Pediatric reference data for dual X-ray absorptiometric measures of normal bone density in the distal femur. AJR 178:439–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Southard RN, Morris JD, Mahan JD, et al (1991) Bone mass in healthy children: measurement with quantitative DXA. Radiology 179:735–738

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Sluis IM, de Ridder MA, Boot AM, et al (2002) Reference data for bone density and body composition measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in white children and young adults. Arch Dis Child 87:341–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yirtama P, Mahonen H (1960) Thickness of the cortical layer as an estimate of mineral content of human finger bones. Br J Radiol 6:60–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosholm A, Hyldstrup L, Bæksgaard L, et al (2001) Estimation of bone mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry: theoretical background and clinical testing. Osteoporos Int 11:961–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouxsein ML, Palermo L, Yeung C, et al (2002) Digital X-ray radiogrammetry predicts hip, wrist and vertebral fracture risk in elderly women: a prospective analysis from the study of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 13:358–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mentzel HJ, John U, Boettcher J, et al (2005) Evaluation of bone-mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Radiol 35:489–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Rijn RR, Grootfaam DS, Lequin MH, et al (2004) Digital radiogrammetry of the hand in a pediatric and adolescent Dutch Caucasian population: normative data and measurements in children with inflammatory bowel disease and juvenile chronic arthritis. Calcif Tissue Int 74:342–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Sluis IM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Hahlen K, et al (2002) Altered bone mineral density and body composition, and increased fracture risk in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr 141:204–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Sluis IM, Boot AM, Hop WC, et al (2002) Long-term effects of growth hormone therapy on bone mineral density, body composition, and serum lipid levels in growth hormone deficient children: a 6-year follow-up study. Horm Res 58:207–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R (1992) New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reed MR, Murray JR, Abdy SE, et al (2004) The use of digital X-ray radiogrammetry and peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients attending fracture clinic after distal forearm fracture. Bone 34:716–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ward KA, Cotton J, Adams JE (2003) A technical and clinical evaluation of digital X-ray radiogrammetry. Osteoporos Int 14:389–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boonen S, Nijs J, Borghs H, et al (2005) Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study. Osteoporos Int 16:93–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva: WHO Technical report series

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Sectra-Pronosco (Linköping, Sweden) for supplying the X-posure system for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rick R. van Rijn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Rijn, R.R., Boot, A., Wittenberg, R. et al. Direct X-ray radiogrammetry versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: assessment of bone density in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and growth hormone deficiency. Pediatr Radiol 36, 227–232 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0080-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0080-3

Keywords

Navigation