Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 11–25 | Cite as

Pediatric thoracic CT angiography

  • Donald P. FrushEmail author
  • J. René Herlong
Minisymposium

Abstract

One of the principal benefits of contemporary multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) has been the ability to obtain high-quality data sets for evaluation of the cardiovascular system. The benefits of the greater number of detector rows and submillimeter image thicknesses were quickly recognized and are especially advantageous in children. For example, since imaging is performed so quickly, issues with motion are minimized. This is a substantial benefit of CTA compared with MR imaging, the traditional noninvasive cross sectional modality for pediatric cardiovascular imaging. This, together with faster and more powerful computers, including improved transfer and storage capabilities, offers improved depiction of the heart, great vessels, other vasculature, and adjacent intrathoracic structures in a fashion that is well accepted by clinical colleagues. In order to be successful, however, one must have an understanding of the technology and often unique technical considerations in infants and children. With this familiarity, excellent cardiovascular examinations can be performed even in the most challenging case.

Keywords

CT angiography Multidetector row computed tomography Cardiovascular system 

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold V, Worms AM, Galloy MA, et al (1996) Diagnosis using x-ray computed angiotomography of an iliac artery aneurysm in an infant. Can Assoc Radiol J 47:260–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brochhagen HA, Benz-Bohm G, Mennicken U, et al (1997) Spiral CT angiography in an infant with severe hypoplasia of a long segment of the descending aorta. Pediatr Radiol 27:181–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hopkins Kl, Patrick LE, Simoneaux SF, et al (1996) Pediatric great vessel anomalies: initial clinical experience with spiral CT angiography. Radiology 200:811–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen RA, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2000) Data acquisition for pediatric CT angiography: problems and solutions. Pediatr Radiol 30:813–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilkeson RC, Ciancidello L, Zahka K (2003) Multidetector CT evaluation of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. AJR 180:973–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goo HW, Park I-S, Ko FK, et al (2003) CT of congenital heart disease: normal anatomy and typical pathologic conditions. Radiographics 23:S147–S165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Society for Pediatric Radiology and National Cancer Institute (2002) Radiation and pediatric computed tomography: a guide for health care providers. http://www.pedrad.org. Cited 21 May 2004
  8. 8.
    Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT. AJR 176:303–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frush DP (2002) Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminish radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 32:714–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frush DP (2002) Strategies of dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol 32:293–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pappas JN, Donnelly LF, Frush DP (2000) Marked reduction in the frequency of sedation of children using new multislice helical CT. Radiology 215:897–899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pages J, Buls N, Osteaux M (2003) CT doses in children: a multicenter study. Br J Radiol 76:803–811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li LB, Kai M, Kusama T (2001) Radiation exposure to patients during pediatric cardiac catheterization. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 94:323–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frush DP, Bisset GS, Hall SC (1996) Pediatric sedation: the practice of safe sleep. AJR 167:1381–1387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long FR, Castile RG, Brody AS, et al (1999) Lungs in infants and young children: improved thin-section computed tomography with a noninvasive controlled-ventilation technique: initial experience. Radiology 212:588–593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen MD, Smith JA (1994) Intravenous use of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in children. Radiology 191:793–794PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frush DP, Spencer EB, Donnelly LF, et al (1999) Optimizing contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in infants and children using bolus tracking. AJR 172:1007–1013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herts BR, O’Malley CM, Wirth SL, et al (2001) Power injection of contrast media using central venous catheters: feasibility, safety and efficacy. AJR 176:447–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nelson RC, Anderson FA Jr, Birnbaum BA, et al (1998) Contrast media extravasation during dynamic CT: detection with an extravasation detection accessory. Radiology 209:837–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Denecke T, Frush DP, Li J (2002) Eight-channel multidetector CT: unique potential for pediatric chest CT. J Thorac Imaging 17:306–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fleischmann D (2003) Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 13 [Suppl 5]:M14–M20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fox SH, Toth T (2002) Dose reduction on GE CT scanners. Pediatr Radiol 32:718–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, et al (2004) Low-kilovoltage multi–detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231:169–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee EY, Siegel MJ, Hildebolt CF (2004) MDCT evaluation of thoracic aortic anomalies in pediatric patients and young adults: comparison of axial, multiplanar, and 3D images. AJR 182:777–784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donnelly LF, Frush DP (2003) Pediatric multidetector body CT. Radiol Clin North Am 41:637–655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siegel MJ (2003) Multiplanar and three-dimensional multidetector row CT of thoracic vessels and airways in the pediatric population. Radiology 229:641–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Desjardins B, Kazerooni EA (2004) ECG-gated cardiac CT. AJR 182:993–1010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Frush DP, Donnelly LF (1997) Pulmonary sequestration spectrum: a new spin with helical CT. AJR 169:679–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee EY, Siegel MJ, Sierra LM, et al (2004) Evaluation of angioarchitecture of pulmonary sequestration in pediatric patients using 3D MDCT angiography. AJR 183:183–188PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Pediatric Radiology, 1905 McGovern-Davison Children’s Health Center, Department of RadiologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of PediatricsDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations